Paper · 2010 · Weed Technology

Effects of Adjuvants, Halosulfuron, and Grass Herbicides onCucurbitaspp. Injury and Grass Control

Kate J. Kammler; S. Alan Walters; Bryan G. Young

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate pumpkin cultivar injury and control of three grass species from tank-mixtures of halosulfuron with either clethodim or sethoxydim in combination with nonionic surfactant (NIS), crop-oil concentrate (COC), methylated seed oil (MSO), and high-surfactant oil concentrate (HSOC). Pumpkin injury, in the form of chlorosis and visual growth reduction, was 13 to 21% by 7 d after treatment (DAT) for all pumpkin cultivars. The specific adjuvant used with halosulfuron did not influence pumpkin injury or final plant dry weight. Pumpkin growth reduction at 21 DAT from halosulfuron was less than 9% for all pumpkin cultivars with the least growth reduction (5% or less) observed with Cucurbita pepo ‘Howden’, C. pepo ‘Appalachian’, and Cucurbita moschata ‘Libby's Select’. The efficacy of sethoxydim or clethodim on large crabgrass was antagonized by the addition of halosulfuron with NIS or COC. However, only combinations of sethoxydim and halosulfuron with COC or MSO were antagonistic on smooth crabgrass. Giant foxtail dry weight reduction was decreased 4 to 24% by the addition of halosulfuron to sethoxydim with NIS and clethodim regardless of adjuvant. Although the frequency and magnitude of grass antagonism was variable, the use of clethodim and MSO with halosulfuron most often provided the greatest level of grass control compared with sethoxydim or other adjuvants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin cultivars showed 13 to 21% injury at 7 DAT.

Taxon
Pumpkine0
Outcome
Pumpkin injurye0
Value
13 to 21%e0
Qualifier
7 d after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Pumpkin injury, in the form of chlorosis and visual growth reduction, was 13 to 21% by 7 d after treatment (DAT) for all pumpkin cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adjuvant choice did not affect pumpkin injury or final dry weight.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Treatment
adjuvant used with halosulfurone0
Outcome
pumpkin injury or final plant dry weighte0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The specific adjuvant used with halosulfuron did not influence pumpkin injury or final plant dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halosulfuron caused less than 9% pumpkin growth reduction at 21 DAT.

Taxon
Pumpkine0
Treatment
halosulfurone0
Outcome
growth reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
less than 9%e0
Qualifier
21 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pumpkin growth reduction at 21 DAT from halosulfuron was less than 9% for all pumpkin cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named cultivars had the least growth reduction, at 5% or less.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepoCucurbita pepoe0
Outcome
growth reductione0
Direction
leaste0
Value
5% or lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“least growth reduction (5% or less) observed with Cucurbita pepo ‘Howden’, C. pepo ‘Appalachian’, and Cucurbita moschata ‘Libby's Select’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halosulfuron with NIS or COC antagonized sethoxydim or clethodim control of large crabgrass.

Treatment
addition of halosulfuron with NIS or COCe0
Interactor
large crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
efficacy of sethoxydim or clethodim on large crabgrasse0
Direction
antagonizede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of sethoxydim or clethodim on large crabgrass was antagonized by the addition of halosulfuron with NIS or COC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sethoxydim and halosulfuron with COC or MSO antagonized control of smooth crabgrass.

Treatment
combinations of sethoxydim and halosulfuron with COC or MSOe0
Interactor
smooth crabgrassDigitaria ischaemume0weed
Outcome
smooth crabgrasse0
Direction
antagonistice0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Digitaria ischaemum
Digitaria ischaemum · InteractorStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only combinations of sethoxydim and halosulfuron with COC or MSO were antagonistic on smooth crabgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halosulfuron reduced giant foxtail dry weight reduction by 4 to 24% with the specified combinations.

Treatment
addition of halosulfuron to sethoxydim with NIS and clethodim regardless of adjuvante0
Interactor
Giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
Giant foxtail dry weight reductione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4 to 24%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Giant foxtail dry weight reduction was decreased 4 to 24% by the addition of halosulfuron to sethoxydim with NIS and clethodim regardless of adjuvant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clethodim and MSO with halosulfuron most often gave greatest grass control.

Treatment
clethodim and MSO with halosulfurone0
Outcome
grass controle0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
sethoxydim or other adjuvantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the use of clethodim and MSO with halosulfuron most often provided the greatest level of grass control compared with sethoxydim or other adjuvants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1420 · show in text ↑

Halosulfuron-methyl · crop injury · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

adjuvant · crop injury · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.