Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Instructional cum Research Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi VisHand weedingavidyalaya, Raipur (C.G.) during mansoon crop 2021 and 2022. The soil of experimental field was neutral in reaction, medium in organic carbon and low in available nitrogen, low in available phosphorus and high in available potassium. Experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications, consisted of T1-Imazethapyr 10 % SL (Dose-55 g a.i. ha-1), T2- Fluazifop-p-butyl 13.4% w w-1 (Dose-250 g a.i. ha-1), T3-Propaquizafop 2.5% w w-1 (weight per weight) + imazethapyr 3.75 % w w-1 ME (ready mix) (Dose-83.3g a.i. ha-1), T4- Acifluorfen-sodium 16.5% EC + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC (ready mix) (Dose-210 g a.i. ha-1), T5- Fomesafen 11.1% w w-1 + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w w-1 (ready mix) (Dose-440 g a.i. ha-1), T6-Hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS (Days after sowing) , T7- Weed free (Hand weeding at 20, 40 and 60 DAS) and T8- Unweeded check. The weeds of the experimental site was dominated with grasses like Echinochloacolona, Dinebraretroflexa, broad leaves like Parthenium hysterophorus, Celosia argentea, sedge like Cyperus sps. and other weeds. Results revealed that all the yield attributes and yield was highest in fomesafen 11.1% w w-1 + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w w-1 (ready mix) (Dose-440 g a.i. ha-1) (T5) which was at par with propaquizafop 2.5% w w-1 + imazethapyr 3.75 % w w-1 ME (ready mix) (Dose-83.3g a.i. ha-1)(T3) and acifluorfen-sodium 16.5% EC + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC (ready mix) (Dose-210 g a.i. ha-1)(T4). Similar ways, weed density was also significantly reduced in these treatments to others. However, higher WCE (Weed control efficiency) was noticed in this treatment than unweeded check.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Mungbean yield attributes and yield were highest with the fomesafen + fluazifop-p-butyl ready mix at 440 g a.i. ha-1 (T5).
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- fomesafen 11.1% w w-1 + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w w-1 (ready mix) (Dose-440 g a.i. ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- yield attributes and yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean”
e0“all the yield attributes and yield was highest in fomesafen 11.1% w w-1 + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w w-1 (ready mix) (Dose-440 g a.i. ha-1) (T5)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mungbean yield attributes and yield with the propaquizafop + imazethapyr ready mix at 83.3 g a.i. ha-1 (T3) were at par with those under T5.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- propaquizafop 2.5% w w-1 + imazethapyr 3.75 % w w-1 ME (ready mix) (Dose-83.3g a.i. ha-1)e2
- Outcome
- yield attributes and yielde0
- Direction
- at pare1
- Comparator
- T5e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean”
e0“all the yield attributes and yield was highest in fomesafen 11.1% w w-1 + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w w-1 (ready mix) (Dose-440 g a.i. ha-1) (T5)”
e1“at par”
e2“propaquizafop 2.5% w w-1 + imazethapyr 3.75 % w w-1 ME (ready mix) (Dose-83.3g a.i. ha-1)(T3)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mungbean yield attributes and yield with the acifluorfen-sodium + clodinafop-propargyl ready mix at 210 g a.i. ha-1 (T4) were at par with those under T5.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- acifluorfen-sodium 16.5% EC + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC (ready mix) (Dose-210 g a.i. ha-1)e3
- Outcome
- yield attributes and yielde0
- Direction
- at pare1
- Comparator
- T5e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean”
e0“all the yield attributes and yield was highest in fomesafen 11.1% w w-1 + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w w-1 (ready mix) (Dose-440 g a.i. ha-1) (T5)”
e1“at par”
e3“acifluorfen-sodium 16.5% EC + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC (ready mix) (Dose-210 g a.i. ha-1)(T4)”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed density was significantly reduced in the T5, T3 and T4 treatments compared with the other treatments.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- these treatmentse1
- Interactor
- weede1weed
- Outcome
- weed densitye1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- otherse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean”
e1“weed density was also significantly reduced in these treatments to others”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control efficiency (WCE) was higher in the T5 treatment than in the unweeded check.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- this treatmente1
- Outcome
- WCE (Weed control efficiency)e1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- unweeded checke1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean”
e1“higher WCE (Weed control efficiency) was noticed in this treatment than unweeded check”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fomesafen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →propaquizafop · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →fluazifop-P-butyl · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.