Paper · 2021 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effect of Weed Management Practices on Weed Dynamics, Nutrient Depletion, Productivity and Profitability of Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata) under Zero Tillage Condition

Kuldeep Singh; Hardev Ram; Rakesh Kumar; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background: Weeds are prime factor that adversely effects on growth, quality and yield of mungbean during summer and rainy season. Being a short duration crop, it faces heavy weed competition right from the early growth stages to harvesting. The critical period of crop weed competition in mungbean was initial 25-30 days, yield may be reduce up to 50-90% if weeds not manage at this stage. Hence, there is a need to find out the successful weed management strategies to realize higher growth and yield. The progressive transformation of agriculture concerning intensive use of herbicides is gaining status in recent years due to easy, lower cost, timeliness and successful controlling weeds. Therefore, keeping above information in view, the present study was undertaken to assess the effect of different weed management practices in summer mungbean under zero tillage condition to find out the better weed management, higher productivity and profitability. Methods: In this field-laboratory investigation during summer season, 2019, different herbicides were applied to manage weeds in mungbean. Eight treatments were applied based on various application windows. In the field and laboratory, the collected samples were determined for crop weed competition, yield attributes, yields and net returns. Result: The results revealed that weed free treatment was recorded lowest weed population at 30 DAS and harvest (1.8 and 2.9), weed dry weight (1.1 and 1.9g) and highest weed control efficiency (96.3 and 94.9%) followed by Pendimethalin (PE) fb one HW and Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) application. The similar results also observed in nutrients removed by weeds. Among yield attributes, weed free treatment recorded the longest pod length, no. of pods/plant, no. of seeds/pod and test weight (7.9, 21.0, 9.7 and 43.0g, respectively) which was at par with Pendimethalin (PE) fb one HW and Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) application. The magnitude of seed yield was increased under weed free (10.1 q/ha) and Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) (9.5 q/ha) treatments by 127.9 and 113.8%, respectively over weedy check. Application of Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) recorded highest net returns (Rs 55,079/ha) and B: C (2.8) over rest of the treatments. It can concluded that application of Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) @ 2 L/ha at 20 DAS recommended for better weed control, higher yield and net returns of summer mungbean under zero tillage condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the lowest weed populations at 30 DAS and harvest.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0t0
Interactor
weede0t0weed
Outcome
weed populatione0t0
Direction
loweste0t0
Value
1.8 and 2.9e0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free treatment was recorded lowest weed population at 30 DAS and harvest (1.8 and 2.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the lowest weed dry weight at 30 DAS and harvest.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0t0
Interactor
weede0t0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0t0
Direction
loweste0t0
Value
1.1 and 1.9ge0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free treatment was recorded lowest weed population at 30 DAS and harvest (1.8 and 2.9), weed dry weight (1.1 and 1.9g) and highest weed control efficiency (96.3 and 94.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the highest weed control efficiency.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0t0
Interactor
weede0t0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0t0
Direction
higheste0t0
Value
96.3 and 94.9%e0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free treatment was recorded lowest weed population at 30 DAS and harvest (1.8 and 2.9), weed dry weight (1.1 and 1.9g) and highest weed control efficiency (96.3 and 94.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus hand weeding followed the weed-free treatment for weed control.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Outcome
followed by Pendimethalin (PE) fb one HWe0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Pendimethalin (PE) fb one HW and Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaked followed the weed-free treatment for weed control.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Outcome
Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) applicatione0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Pendimethalin (PE) fb one HW and Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrients removed by weeds showed a similar treatment pattern.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Interactor
weedse0t0weed
Outcome
nutrients removed by weedse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The similar results also observed in nutrients removed by weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave pod length of 7.9.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0t0
Outcome
pod lengthe0t0
Direction
longeste0t0
Value
7.9e0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free treatment recorded the longest pod length, no. of pods/plant, no. of seeds/pod and test weight (7.9, 21.0, 9.7 and 43.0g, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave 21.0 pods per plant.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0t0
Outcome
no. of pods/plante0t0
Value
21.0e0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free treatment recorded the longest pod length, no. of pods/plant, no. of seeds/pod and test weight (7.9, 21.0, 9.7 and 43.0g, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave 9.7 seeds per pod.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0t0
Outcome
no. of seeds/pode0t0
Value
9.7e0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free treatment recorded the longest pod length, no. of pods/plant, no. of seeds/pod and test weight (7.9, 21.0, 9.7 and 43.0g, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave test weight of 43.0g.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0t0
Outcome
test weighte0t0
Value
43.0ge0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free treatment recorded the longest pod length, no. of pods/plant, no. of seeds/pod and test weight (7.9, 21.0, 9.7 and 43.0g, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment seed yield was 10.1 q/ha, 127.9% above weedy check.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
weed freee0t0
Outcome
seed yielde0t0
Direction
increasede0t0
Value
10.1 q/hae0t0
Qualifier
127.9e0t0
Comparator
weedy checke0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield was increased under weed free (10.1 q/ha) and Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) (9.5 q/ha) treatments by 127.9 and 113.8%, respectively over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaked seed yield was 9.5 q/ha, 113.8% above weedy check.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper)e0t0
Outcome
seed yielde0t0
Direction
increasede0t0
Value
9.5 q/hae0t0
Qualifier
113.8%e0t0
Comparator
weedy checke0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield was increased under weed free (10.1 q/ha) and Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) (9.5 q/ha) treatments by 127.9 and 113.8%, respectively over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaked produced the highest net returns of Rs 55,079/ha.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper)e0t0
Outcome
net returnse0t0
Direction
higheste0t0
Value
Rs 55,079/hae0t0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) recorded highest net returns (Rs 55,079/ha) and B: C (2.8) over rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaked produced the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.8.

Taxon
Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)Vigna radiatae0t0
Treatment
Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper)e0t0
Outcome
B: Ce0t0
Direction
higheste0t0
Value
2.8e0t0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) recorded highest net returns (Rs 55,079/ha) and B: C (2.8) over rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–139 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Shaked at 2 L/ha and 20 DAS.

Taxon
summer mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
application of Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) @ 2 L/ha at 20 DASe0
Qualifier
under zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) @ 2 L/ha at 20 DAS recommended for better weed control, higher yield and net returns of summer mungbean under zero tillage condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2295–2480 · show in text ↑

propaquizafop · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.