Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Optimization of seeding rate and foliar application management to improve rainfed wheat physiological characteristics, grain yield and quality

Layegh Moradi; Adel Siosemardeh; Gniewko Niedbała

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop management practices such as seeding rate and foliar application can greatly influence rainfed wheat yield and quality. Study objectives included assessing the effect of seeding rate and foliar application on rainfed wheat. Two field experiments with four seeding rates (80, 110, 140, and 170 kg ha−1) and six foliar applications [control, urea (4%), vitaspirin (0.1%), silicon (4 mM), FeSO4.7H2O (0.6%), and ZnSO4.7H2O (0.4%)] were conducted during the 2021–2023 growing seasons. With an increased seeding rate, the relative water content, carotenoid, membrane stability index, grain Zn, Fe, and protein contents decreased. In contrast, it increased proline, glycine betaine concentrations, biological yield, and grain yield. The interaction between seeding rate and foliar application found that foliar application increased proline and glycine betaine concentration, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity, and chlorophyll content, whereas it decreased malondialdehyde concentration. During both growing seasons, there was no significant difference between 140 and 180 kg ha−1 seeding rates in grain yield. The highest grain yield was recorded in ZnSO4 and silicon foliar application at 170 (2331.7 and 2275.6 kg ha−1) and 140 kg ha−1 (2279.8 and 2242.0 kg ha−1) rates. Increasing the seeding rate from 80 to 170 kg ha−1 reduces grain quality. Foliar application, especially ZnSO4 and silicon at the final stage as a crop management practice could lead to increased water shortage resistance, grain yield, and biofortification of rainfed wheat. It can be concluded from the experiment that the optimal combination of seeding rate and foliar application was foliar application of ZnSO4 and silicon at 140 kg ha−1 seeding rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates decreased wheat relative water content, carotenoid and membrane stability index.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased seeding ratee0
Outcome
relative water content, carotenoid, membrane stability indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With an increased seeding rate, the relative water content, carotenoid, membrane stability index, grain Zn, Fe, and protein contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates decreased grain Zn, Fe and protein contents.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased seeding ratee0
Outcome
grain Zn, Fe, and protein contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With an increased seeding rate, the relative water content, carotenoid, membrane stability index, grain Zn, Fe, and protein contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates increased proline and glycine betaine concentrations.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
proline, glycine betaine concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
rainfed wheatt0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, it increased proline, glycine betaine concentrations, biological yield, and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates increased biological and grain yield.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
biological yield, and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
rainfed wheatt0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, it increased proline, glycine betaine concentrations, biological yield, and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application increased proline and glycine betaine under the seeding rate interaction.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
proline and glycine betaine concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between seeding rate and foliar application found that foliar application increased proline and glycine betaine concentration, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity, and chlorophyll content, whereas it decreased malondialdehyde concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application increased peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between seeding rate and foliar application found that foliar application increased proline and glycine betaine concentration, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity, and chlorophyll content, whereas it decreased malondialdehyde concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application increased chlorophyll content.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between seeding rate and foliar application found that foliar application increased proline and glycine betaine concentration, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity, and chlorophyll content, whereas it decreased malondialdehyde concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application decreased malondialdehyde concentration.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
malondialdehyde concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between seeding rate and foliar application found that foliar application increased proline and glycine betaine concentration, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity, and chlorophyll content, whereas it decreased malondialdehyde concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not differ significantly between 140 and 180 kg ha−1 seeding rates in either season.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
140e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
During both growing seasonse0
Comparator
180 kg ha−1 seeding ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During both growing seasons, there was no significant difference between 140 and 180 kg ha−1 seeding rates in grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 170 kg ha−1, ZnSO4 foliar application produced grain yield of 2331.7 kg ha−1.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO4e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2331.7e0
Qualifier
170e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in ZnSO4 and silicon foliar application at 170 (2331.7 and 2275.6 kg ha−1) and 140 kg ha−1 (2279.8 and 2242.0 kg ha−1) rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 170 kg ha−1, silicon foliar application produced grain yield of 2275.6 kg ha−1.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
silicone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2275.6 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
170e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in ZnSO4 and silicon foliar application at 170 (2331.7 and 2275.6 kg ha−1) and 140 kg ha−1 (2279.8 and 2242.0 kg ha−1) rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 140 kg ha−1, ZnSO4 foliar application produced grain yield of 2279.8 kg ha−1.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO4e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2279.8e0
Qualifier
140 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in ZnSO4 and silicon foliar application at 170 (2331.7 and 2275.6 kg ha−1) and 140 kg ha−1 (2279.8 and 2242.0 kg ha−1) rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 140 kg ha−1, silicon foliar application produced grain yield of 2242.0 kg ha−1.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
silicone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2242.0 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
140 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in ZnSO4 and silicon foliar application at 170 (2331.7 and 2275.6 kg ha−1) and 140 kg ha−1 (2279.8 and 2242.0 kg ha−1) rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 80 to 170 kg ha−1 reduced grain quality.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing the seeding rate from 80 to 170 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the seeding rate from 80 to 170 kg ha−1 reduces grain quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded that ZnSO4 and silicon foliar application at 140 kg ha−1 was optimal.

Taxon
rainfed wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
foliar application of ZnSO4 and silicon at 140 kg ha−1 seeding ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be concluded from the experiment that the optimal combination of seeding rate and foliar application was foliar application of ZnSO4 and silicon at 140 kg ha−1 seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1739 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑

density · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.