Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of silicon on photosynthetic gas exchange, photosynthetic pigments, cell membrane stability and relative water content of different wheat cultivars under drought stress conditions

Kobra Maghsoudi; Yahya Emam; Mohammad Pessarakli

15
claims
34
verbatim quotes
193
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study aims to explain the effects of silicon (Si) foliar application on gas exchange characteristics, photosynthetic pigments, membrane stability and leaf relative water content of different wheat cultivars in the field under drought stress conditions. The experiment was arranged as a split-split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications. Irrigation regime (100%, 60%, and 40% F.C.), silicon (control and Si application) and wheat cultivars (Shiraz, Marvdasht, Chamran, and Sirvan) were considered as main, sub and sub-sub plots, respectively. This study was carried out at the Research Farm of the Collage of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran, during 2012–2013 growing season. The results showed that foliar application of silicon increased the leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and membrane stability index (MSI) in all wheat cultivars, especially in Sirvan and Chamran (drought tolerant cultivars), under both stress and non-stress conditions. However, more improvement was observed under drought stress as compared to the non-stress condition. In contrast, these parameters decreased under drought stress. Si significantly decreased electrolyte leakage in all four cultivars under drought stress conditions. Furthermore, the intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration (Ci) increased under drought stress. Si application decreased Ci especially under drought stress conditions. Net photosynthesis rate (A), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) were significantly decreased under drought conditions. Under drought, Si applied plants showed significantly higher leaf photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance. Intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) and carboxylation efficiency (CE) decreased in all cultivars under drought stress. However, the silicon-applied plants had greater WUEi and CE under drought stress. The stomatal limitation was found to be higher in stressed plants compared to the control. Exogenously applied silicon also decreased stomatal limitation. Overall, application of Si was found beneficial for improving drought tolerance of wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon increased wheat leaf relative water content.

Treatment
foliar application of silicone0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of silicon increased the leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and membrane stability index (MSI) in all wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon increased photosynthetic pigments in all wheat cultivars.

Treatment
foliar application of silicone0
Outcome
photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of silicon increased the leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and membrane stability index (MSI) in all wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon increased wheat chlorophyll stability index.

Treatment
foliar application of silicone0
Outcome
chlorophyll stability index (CSI)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of silicon increased the leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and membrane stability index (MSI) in all wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon increased wheat membrane stability index.

Treatment
foliar application of silicone0
Outcome
membrane stability index (MSI)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of silicon increased the leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and membrane stability index (MSI) in all wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These silicon improvements were stronger under drought than under non-stress conditions.

Treatment
foliar application of silicone1
Outcome
improvemente0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
non-stress conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more improvement was observed under drought stress as compared to the non-stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of silicon increased the leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and membrane stability index (MSI) in all wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased leaf water content, pigments, and chlorophyll and membrane stability indices.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI)e1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these parameters decreased under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf relative water content, photosynthesis pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total chl and carotenoids), chlorophyll stability index (CSI) and membrane stability index (MSI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon significantly decreased electrolyte leakage under drought in all four wheat cultivars.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
under drought stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si significantly decreased electrolyte leakage in all four cultivars under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased intercellular carbon dioxide concentration.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration (Ci)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration (Ci) increased under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon decreased intercellular carbon dioxide concentration, especially under drought.

Treatment
Si applicatione0
Outcome
Cie0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
especially under drought stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si application decreased Ci especially under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1527 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration (Ci)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased wheat net photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
Net photosynthesis rate (A), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis rate (A), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) were significantly decreased under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, silicon-treated wheat had significantly higher photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
Si appliede0
Outcome
leaf photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Under droughte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought, Si applied plants showed significantly higher leaf photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased intrinsic water use efficiency and carboxylation efficiency in all cultivars.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) and carboxylation efficiency (CE)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) and carboxylation efficiency (CE) decreased in all cultivars under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1918 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon-treated plants had greater intrinsic water use efficiency and carboxylation efficiency under drought.

Treatment
silicon-appliede0
Outcome
WUEi and CEe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the silicon-applied plants had greater WUEi and CE under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2000 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) and carboxylation efficiency (CE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased stomatal limitation relative to control.

Treatment
stressed plantse0
Outcome
stomatal limitatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomatal limitation was found to be higher in stressed plants compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2002–2091 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous silicon decreased stomatal limitation.

Treatment
Exogenously applied silicone0
Outcome
stomatal limitatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenously applied silicon also decreased stomatal limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2155 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–154 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

application · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 70 positive, 2 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.