Abstract
A field experiment entitled” Performance of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) Varieties under different Row Spacing” was conducted at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur during rabi 2010-11. The experiment consisted of 12 treatment combinations comprising of four spacing treatments (15.0, 17.5, 20.0 and 22.5 cm) and three varieties (GW 322, GW 366 and HI 1544). The experiment was conducted in factorial randomized block design and it was replicated four times. Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight. Maximum grain yield (4.77 t ha-1), straw yield (7.87 t ha-1) and biological yield (12.62 t ha-1) were recorded in variety GW 366 which is significantly higher over GW 322 and HI 1544. Variety GW 366 recorded significantly higher net returns (52813 Rs ha-1) and B C ratio (2.84) which was found statistically superior over HI 1544 (49097 Rs ha-1 and 2.64) and GW 322 (46350 Rs ha-1 and 2.49). Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing. Row spacing of 20.0 centimetre gave significantly higher grain yield (4.85 t ha-1), straw yield (7.80 t ha-1 ), biological yield ( 12.65 t ha-1 ) where as harvest index was maximum under 22.5 centimetre row spacing (38.80). Sowing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded significantly higher net returns (Rs 53750 ha-1) and BC ratio ( 2.89) over 15.0 cm and 17.5 centimetre while at par with 22.5 centimetre row spacing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 recorded the highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS and Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS among three wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- GW 366e1
- Outcome
- dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DASe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- three wheat varieties growne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 recorded the highest Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, total tillers and effective tillers among three wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- GW 366e1
- Outcome
- Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillerse1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- three wheat varieties growne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 recorded the highest number of grains per ear and test weight among three wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- GW 366e1
- Outcome
- number of grains ears-1 and test weighte1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- three wheat varieties growne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 gave significantly higher grain yield (4.77 t ha-1) than GW 322 and HI 1544.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- GW 366e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 4.77 t ha-1e2
- Comparator
- GW 322 and HI 1544e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
e2“Maximum grain yield (4.77 t ha-1), straw yield (7.87 t ha-1) and biological yield (12.62 t ha-1) were recorded in variety GW 366 which is significantly higher over GW 322 and HI 1544”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 gave significantly higher straw yield (7.87 t ha-1) than GW 322 and HI 1544.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- GW 366e2
- Outcome
- straw yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 7.87 t ha-1e2
- Comparator
- GW 322 and HI 1544e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
e2“Maximum grain yield (4.77 t ha-1), straw yield (7.87 t ha-1) and biological yield (12.62 t ha-1) were recorded in variety GW 366 which is significantly higher over GW 322 and HI 1544”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 gave significantly higher biological yield (12.62 t ha-1) than GW 322 and HI 1544.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- GW 366e2
- Outcome
- biological yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 12.62 t ha-1e2
- Comparator
- GW 322 and HI 1544e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
e2“Maximum grain yield (4.77 t ha-1), straw yield (7.87 t ha-1) and biological yield (12.62 t ha-1) were recorded in variety GW 366 which is significantly higher over GW 322 and HI 1544”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 gave significantly higher net returns (52813 Rs ha-1) than HI 1544.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- GW 366e3
- Outcome
- net returnse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 52813 Rs ha-1e3
- Comparator
- HI 1544e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
e3“Variety GW 366 recorded significantly higher net returns (52813 Rs ha-1) and B C ratio (2.84) which was found statistically superior over HI 1544 (49097 Rs ha-1 and 2.64) and GW 322 (46350 Rs ha-1 and 2.49)”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety GW 366 gave significantly higher B C ratio (2.84) than HI 1544.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- GW 366e3
- Outcome
- B C ratioe3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 2.84e3
- Comparator
- HI 1544e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Results of field experiment revealed that among three wheat varieties grown, variety GW 366 recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate at 30-60 DAS, Crop Growth Rate at 60-90 DAS, Net Assimilation Rate at 60-90 DAS, number of total tillers, number of effective tillers, number of grains ears-1 and test weight”
e3“Variety GW 366 recorded significantly higher net returns (52813 Rs ha-1) and B C ratio (2.84) which was found statistically superior over HI 1544 (49097 Rs ha-1 and 2.64) and GW 322 (46350 Rs ha-1 and 2.49)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 20.0 cm row spacing, wheat recorded the highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate and Crop Growth Rate over other row spacings.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- 20.0 centimetre row spacinge4
- Outcome
- dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Ratee4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Comparator
- other row spacinge4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
At 20.0 cm row spacing, wheat recorded the highest Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers and effective tillers over other row spacings.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- 20.0 centimetre row spacinge4
- Outcome
- Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillerse4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Comparator
- other row spacinge4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
At 20.0 cm row spacing, wheat recorded the highest test weight over other row spacings.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- 20.0 centimetre row spacinge4
- Outcome
- test weighte4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Comparator
- other row spacinge4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 20.0 cm gave significantly higher wheat grain yield (4.85 t ha-1).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- Row spacing of 20.0 centimetree5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 4.85 t ha-1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”
e5“Row spacing of 20.0 centimetre gave significantly higher grain yield (4.85 t ha-1), straw yield (7.80 t ha-1 ), biological yield ( 12.65 t ha-1 ) where as harvest index was maximum under 22.5 centimetre row spacing (38.80)”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 20.0 cm gave significantly higher wheat straw yield (7.80 t ha-1).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- Row spacing of 20.0 centimetree5
- Outcome
- straw yielde5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 7.80 t ha-1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”
e5“Row spacing of 20.0 centimetre gave significantly higher grain yield (4.85 t ha-1), straw yield (7.80 t ha-1 ), biological yield ( 12.65 t ha-1 ) where as harvest index was maximum under 22.5 centimetre row spacing (38.80)”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing of 20.0 cm gave significantly higher wheat biological yield (12.65 t ha-1).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- Row spacing of 20.0 centimetree5
- Outcome
- biological yielde5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 12.65 t ha-1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”
e5“Row spacing of 20.0 centimetre gave significantly higher grain yield (4.85 t ha-1), straw yield (7.80 t ha-1 ), biological yield ( 12.65 t ha-1 ) where as harvest index was maximum under 22.5 centimetre row spacing (38.80)”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index of wheat was maximum under 22.5 cm row spacing (38.80).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- 22.5 centimetre row spacinge5
- Outcome
- harvest indexe5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 38.80e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”
e5“Row spacing of 20.0 centimetre gave significantly higher grain yield (4.85 t ha-1), straw yield (7.80 t ha-1 ), biological yield ( 12.65 t ha-1 ) where as harvest index was maximum under 22.5 centimetre row spacing (38.80)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 20.0 cm row spacing, wheat gave significantly higher net returns (Rs 53750 ha-1) than 15.0 cm and 17.5 cm spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume6
- Treatment
- 20.0 centimetre row spacinge6
- Outcome
- net returnse6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- Rs 53750 ha-1e6
- Comparator
- 15.0 cm and 17.5 centimetree6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Sowing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded significantly higher net returns (Rs 53750 ha-1) and BC ratio ( 2.89) over 15.0 cm and 17.5 centimetre while at par with 22.5 centimetre row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
At 20.0 cm row spacing, wheat gave significantly higher B C ratio (2.89) than 15.0 cm and 17.5 cm spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume6
- Treatment
- 20.0 centimetre row spacinge6
- Outcome
- BC ratioe6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 2.89e6
- Comparator
- 15.0 cm and 17.5 centimetree6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Sowing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded significantly higher net returns (Rs 53750 ha-1) and BC ratio ( 2.89) over 15.0 cm and 17.5 centimetre while at par with 22.5 centimetre row spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
At 20.0 cm row spacing, net returns were at par with 22.5 cm row spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume6
- Treatment
- 20.0 centimetre row spacinge6
- Outcome
- net returnse6
- Direction
- at pare6
- Comparator
- 22.5 centimetre row spacinge6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Sowing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded significantly higher net returns (Rs 53750 ha-1) and BC ratio ( 2.89) over 15.0 cm and 17.5 centimetre while at par with 22.5 centimetre row spacing”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
106 papers more in this group
See all 110 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.