Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Planting date affects biochemical characteristics, assimilate remobilization, and yield of safflower under water stress

Fatemeh Bahadori; Ehsan Bijanzadeh; Ruhollah Naderi; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Adjusting the planting date is an inexpensive and effective method to mitigate the possible effects of water stress. A 2-year field study was conducted to investigate the effects of planting dates on the biochemical and physiological characteristics and yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress in the 2018 and 2019 growing seasons. The treatments consisted of three planting dates (December 6 and 26 and January 15), three irrigation regimes (normal irrigation, irrigation cut-off at flowering and irrigation cut-off at seed filling) and two safflower cultivars (Goldasht and Isfahan). During the 2-year period, pigment content, enzyme activity, canopy temperature, assimilate remobilization, water use efficiency (WUE) and yield were measured. Planting date and irrigation regime had a significant effect on all parameters, with the most significant differences observed when irrigation was cut-off during flowering and seed filling, resulting in yield reductions of up to 31% in Goldasht. Irrespective of planting date, irrigation cut-off reduced total chlorophyll by 7.5-28.4% and increased canopy temperature. When irrigation was cut off, the relative water content (RWC) of Goldasht was 10.8-11.7% higher than that of Isfahan on December 26. Although irrigation cut-off at flowering stage increased canopy temperature, Goldasht planted on December 26 had the lowest value. Chlorophyll a, carotenoid content, and catalase and peroxidase activities were generally highest on December 26, especially in Goldasht. In addition, dry matter remobilization and remobilization efficiency were higher in the first year due to higher average temperatures and evaporation. In Goldasht, the highest WUE was observed in a planting at the end of December under normal irrigation. Oil content was also highest in Goldasht under normal irrigation, especially when planted in late December. A positive relationship was observed between seed yield and total chlorophyll, RWC, number of seeds per capitulum, remobilization efficiency and WUE. Overall, December 26 was the optimal planting date under water stress, especially for Goldasht, which resulted the highest yield in both years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date and irrigation regime significantly affected all measured parameters.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Treatment
Planting date and irrigation regimee0
Outcome
all parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting date and irrigation regime had a significant effect on all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation cutoff at flowering or seed filling reduced Goldasht yield by up to 31%.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Material
Goldashte0
Treatment
irrigation was cut-off during flowering and seed fillinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
up to 31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation was cut-off during flowering and seed filling, resulting in yield reductions of up to 31% in Goldasht”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation cutoff reduced total chlorophyll by 7.5–28.4%.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Treatment
irrigation cut-offe0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.5-28.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation cut-off reduced total chlorophyll by 7.5-28.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation cutoff increased canopy temperature.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Treatment
irrigation cut-offe0
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation cut-off reduced total chlorophyll by 7.5-28.4% and increased canopy temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1136 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under cutoff, Goldasht relative water content exceeded Isfahan by 10.8–11.7% on December 26.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Material
Goldashte0
Treatment
irrigation was cut offe2
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.8-11.7%e0
Qualifier
December 26e0
Comparator
Isfahane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative water content (RWC) of Goldasht was 10.8-11.7% higher than that of Isfahan on December 26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
e2

“When irrigation was cut off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goldasht planted December 26 had the lowest canopy temperature under flowering-stage cutoff.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Material
Goldashte0
Treatment
irrigation cut-off at flowering stagee2
Outcome
canopy temperaturee2
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
December 26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Goldasht planted on December 26 had the lowest value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although irrigation cut-off at flowering stage increased canopy temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a, carotenoids, catalase and peroxidase were generally highest on December 26, especially in Goldasht.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Material
Goldashte0
Treatment
December 26e0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a, carotenoid content, and catalase and peroxidase activitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a, carotenoid content, and catalase and peroxidase activities were generally highest on December 26, especially in Goldasht”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter remobilization was higher in the first year.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Treatment
first yeare0
Outcome
dry matter remobilizatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter remobilization and remobilization efficiency were higher in the first year due to higher average temperatures and evaporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1688 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remobilization efficiency was higher in the first year.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Treatment
first yeare0
Outcome
remobilization efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter remobilization and remobilization efficiency were higher in the first year due to higher average temperatures and evaporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1688 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goldasht had its highest WUE with late-December planting and normal irrigation.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Material
Goldashte0
Treatment
planting at the end of December under normal irrigatione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Goldasht, the highest WUE was observed in a planting at the end of December under normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1792 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goldasht oil content was highest under normal irrigation, especially late-December planting.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Material
Goldashte0
Treatment
normal irrigatione0
Outcome
Oil contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oil content was also highest in Goldasht under normal irrigation, especially when planted in late December”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1900 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield correlated positively with chlorophyll, RWC and seeds per capitulum.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
positive relationshipe0
Comparator
total chlorophyll, RWC, number of seeds per capitulume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive relationship was observed between seed yield and total chlorophyll, RWC, number of seeds per capitulum, remobilization efficiency and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1902–2050 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield correlated positively with remobilization efficiency and WUE.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
positive relationshipe0
Comparator
remobilization efficiency and WUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive relationship was observed between seed yield and total chlorophyll, RWC, number of seeds per capitulum, remobilization efficiency and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1902–2050 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

December 26 yielded best under water stress, especially for Goldasht, in both years.

Taxon
safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)Carthamus tinctoriuse1
Material
Goldashte0
Treatment
December 26e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“December 26 was the optimal planting date under water stress, especially for Goldasht, which resulted the highest yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2061–2194 · show in text ↑
e1

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–317 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

stage · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.