Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Irrigation and nutrient requirement of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) in black soil

D.K. BASTIA; A.K. ROUT; L. M. GARNAYAK .

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 1995 96 to 1997 98 to optimise the irrigation and nutrient requirement of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in a black soil at Bhawanipatna, Orissa. Application of 2 post sowing irrigations at branching and flowering along with 1 pre sowing irrigation resulted in the maximum seed yield of 1,822 kglha being on par with 1 pre sowing and a post sowing irrigation at branching. These 2 irrigation treatments had similar benefit : cost and water use elficiency (WUE), but consumptive use of water (CU) was more with the former. The seed yield at 80 : 80 : 40 kg of N : P,O, : K,O/ha was the highest (1,718 kglha), followed by 60:60:30 kglha (1,696 kglha). A declining trend in seed yield at the highest fertility level (80 : 80 : 40 kglha) was noticed, particularly when irrigation was withheld at flowering stage. Though CU by safflower increased with in creasing level of fertility, both benefit : ost (1.79) and water use efficiency (4.21 kglha mm) were the maximum at 60 : 60 : 30 kglha of N : P,O, : K,O.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two post-sowing irrigations at branching and flowering plus pre-sowing irrigation gave maximum seed yield of 1,822 kglha, on par with the shorter irrigation regime.

Treatment
2 post sowing irrigations at branching and flowering along with 1 pre sowing irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1,822 kglhae0
Comparator
1 pre sowing and a post sowing irrigation at branchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2 post sowing irrigations at branching and flowering along with 1 pre sowing irrigation resulted in the maximum seed yield of 1,822 kglha being on par with 1 pre sowing and a post sowing irrigation at branching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two irrigation regimes had similar benefit:cost and water use efficiency.

Outcome
benefit : cost and water use elficiency (WUE)e0
Qualifier
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These 2 irrigation treatments had similar benefit : cost and water use elficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consumptive water use was greater with the former, more intensive irrigation regime.

Treatment
2 post sowing irrigations at branching and flowering along with 1 pre sowing irrigationt1
Outcome
consumptive use of water (CU)e0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
1 pre sowing and a post sowing irrigation at branchingt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but consumptive use of water (CU) was more with the former”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Application of 2 post sowing irrigations at branching and flowering along with 1 pre sowing irrigation resulted in the maximum seed yield of 1,822 kglha being on par with 1 pre sowing and a post sowing irrigation at branching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80 : 80 : 40 nutrient rate produced the highest seed yield, 1,718 kglha.

Treatment
80 : 80 : 40 kg of N : P,O, : K,O/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1,718 kglhae0
Comparator
60:60:30 kglhae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed yield at 80 : 80 : 40 kg of N : P,O, : K,O/ha was the highest (1,718 kglha), followed by 60:60:30 kglha (1,696 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60:60:30 nutrient rate yielded 1,696 kglha.

Treatment
60:60:30 kglhae0
Outcome
seed yieldt1
Value
1,696 kglhae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 60:60:30 kglha (1,696 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“The seed yield at 80 : 80 : 40 kg of N : P,O, : K,O/ha was the highest (1,718 kglha), followed by 60:60:30 kglha (1,696 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest fertility level, seed yield tended to decline when flowering-stage irrigation was withheld.

Treatment
80 : 80 : 40 kglhae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
declininge0
Qualifier
particularly when irrigation was withheld at flowering stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A declining trend in seed yield at the highest fertility level (80 : 80 : 40 kglha) was noticed, particularly when irrigation was withheld at flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consumptive water use increased as fertility increased.

Treatment
in creasing level of fertilitye0
Outcome
CUe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CU by safflower increased with in creasing level of fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–939 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit:cost peaked at 1.79 for the 60 : 60 : 30 nutrient rate.

Treatment
60 : 60 : 30 kglha of N : P,O, : K,Oe0
Outcome
benefit : oste0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.79e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both benefit : ost (1.79) and water use efficiency (4.21 kglha mm) were the maximum at 60 : 60 : 30 kglha of N : P,O, : K,O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency peaked at 4.21 kglha mm for the 60 : 60 : 30 nutrient rate.

Treatment
60 : 60 : 30 kglha of N : P,O, : K,Oe0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.21 kglha mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency (4.21 kglha mm) were the maximum at 60 : 60 : 30 kglha of N : P,O, : K,O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.