Paper · 2025 · Scientia Horticulturae

Individual and combined exogenous application of melatonin and methyl Jasmonate confer salinity stress tolerance in tomato by enhancing antioxidants defense system

Mohammad Hamidian; Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini; Mohsen Movahhedi Dehnavi; et al.

14
claims
36
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plants activate physiological responses against salinity stress through hormone signaling pathways such as melatonin (M) and methyl jasmonate (MeJ). These hormones trigger defense responses, but comparing their individual and combined effects under salt stress has not been studied. This research investigates defense responses in tomato plants induced by 100 µM of M and MeJ, along with their combined application (MeJ+M, 100+100 µM) under non-stress, threshold (0.9 g NaCl kg −1 soil) and severe (1.8 g NaCl kg −1 soil) salinity conditions. Compared to melatonin, MeJ application caused adverse effects, including chlorophyll degradation (34.2 %), root inhibition (17.2 %), and elevated H 2 O 2 (28.9 %), O 2 –• (33.7 %), and malondialdehyde (14.3 %) in the plant under non-stress conditions. Evaluation of the MeJ+M treatment in non-stress conditions indicated that M prevented MeJ-induced damage. Besides, the optimal potassium uptake and plant growth were obtained in the MeJ+M treatment under non-stress and threshold salinity levels. Phytohormones application increased enzymatic antioxidant activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase), modified the activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenol oxidase, and consequently boosted non-enzymatic antioxidants (phenolic, flavonoid, and anthocyanin content), resulting in a significant reduction of damage from severe salinity stress. However, due to their almost similar physiological changes induced by MeJ, M, and MeJ+M, these treatments were not superior compared to each other in severe stress. Thus, owing to the disruption of the normal morpho-physiological processes in non-stress conditions by MeJ, M can be considered a safer treatment for practical usage. Additionally, the MeJ+M application can not only optimize antioxidant protection under stress conditions but also stimulate plant growth under non-stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJ application caused chlorophyll degradation of 34.2% in tomato under non-stress conditions, compared with melatonin.

Treatment
MeJ applicatione1
Outcome
chlorophyll degradatione1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
34.2 %e1
Comparator
melatonine1
Setting
non-stress conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to melatonin, MeJ application caused adverse effects, including chlorophyll degradation (34.2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“and malondialdehyde (14.3 %) in the plant under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJ application caused root inhibition of 17.2% in tomato compared with melatonin.

Treatment
MeJ applicatione1
Outcome
root inhibitione2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
17.2 %e2
Comparator
melatonine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to melatonin, MeJ application caused adverse effects, including chlorophyll degradation (34.2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“root inhibition (17.2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJ application elevated H2O2 by 28.9% in tomato compared with melatonin.

Treatment
MeJ applicatione1
Outcome
H 2 O 2e2
Direction
elevatede2
Value
28.9 %e2
Comparator
melatonine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to melatonin, MeJ application caused adverse effects, including chlorophyll degradation (34.2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“elevated H 2 O 2 (28.9 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJ application increased O2 radical production by 33.7% in tomato compared with melatonin.

Treatment
MeJ applicatione1
Outcome
O 2 –•e2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
33.7 %e2
Comparator
melatonine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to melatonin, MeJ application caused adverse effects, including chlorophyll degradation (34.2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“O 2 –• (33.7 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJ application increased malondialdehyde by 14.3% in tomato under non-stress conditions, compared with melatonin.

Treatment
MeJ applicatione1
Outcome
malondialdehydee2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
14.3 %e2
Comparator
melatonine1
Setting
non-stress conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to melatonin, MeJ application caused adverse effects, including chlorophyll degradation (34.2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“and malondialdehyde (14.3 %) in the plant under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The MeJ+M treatment prevented MeJ-induced damage in tomato under non-stress conditions.

Treatment
MeJ+M treatmente1
Outcome
MeJ-induced damagee1
Direction
preventede1
Comparator
MeJe1
Setting
non-stress conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Evaluation of the MeJ+M treatment in non-stress conditions indicated that M prevented MeJ-induced damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The MeJ+M treatment increased potassium uptake and plant growth in tomato under non-stress and threshold salinity.

Treatment
MeJ+M treatmente1
Outcome
potassium uptake and plant growthe1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Setting
non-stress and threshold salinity levelse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Besides, the optimal potassium uptake and plant growth were obtained in the MeJ+M treatment under non-stress and threshold salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytohormone application increased enzymatic antioxidant activity in tomato.

Treatment
Phytohormones applicatione1
Gene
superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidasee1
Outcome
enzymatic antioxidant activitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phytohormones application increased enzymatic antioxidant activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytohormone application modified the activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenol oxidase in tomato.

Treatment
Phytohormones applicatione2
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenol oxidasee1
Outcome
activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenol oxidasee1
Direction
modifiede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“modified the activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenol oxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1255 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phytohormones application increased enzymatic antioxidant activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytohormone application boosted phenolic, flavonoid and anthocyanin content in tomato.

Treatment
Phytohormones applicatione2
Outcome
phenolic, flavonoid, and anthocyanin contente1
Direction
boostede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“boosted non-enzymatic antioxidants (phenolic, flavonoid, and anthocyanin content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phytohormones application increased enzymatic antioxidant activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytohormone application significantly reduced damage from severe salinity stress in tomato.

Treatment
Phytohormones applicatione2
Outcome
damagee1
Direction
reductione1
Setting
severe salinity stresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“resulting in a significant reduction of damage from severe salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phytohormones application increased enzymatic antioxidant activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJ, M and MeJ+M were not superior to each other in tomato under severe stress.

Treatment
MeJ, M, and MeJ+Me1
Outcome
physiological changese1
Direction
not superiore1
Comparator
each othere1
Setting
severe stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, due to their almost similar physiological changes induced by MeJ, M, and MeJ+M, these treatments were not superior compared to each other in severe stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1596 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Melatonin can be considered a safer treatment for practical usage in tomato than MeJ.

Outcome
a safer treatment for practical usagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus, owing to the disruption of the normal morpho-physiological processes in non-stress conditions by MeJ, M can be considered a safer treatment for practical usage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJ+M application can optimize antioxidant protection in tomato under stress conditions.

Treatment
MeJ+M applicatione1
Outcome
antioxidant protection under stress conditionse1
Direction
increaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress tolerance in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Additionally, the MeJ+M application can not only optimize antioxidant protection under stress conditions but also stimulate plant growth under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1929 · show in text ↑

(-)-methyl jasmonate · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

class · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.