Paper · 2019 · Journal of Phytopathology

Induction of systemic resistance in tomato against broomrape (Phelipanche aegyptiaca)

Shahla Borzouei; Rouhallah Sharifi; Nahid Moarrefzadeh

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Rhizosphere dwelling bacteria can increase plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, and they promote plant growth through various mechanisms. In this study, three bioassays were conducted including the following: (a) screening for effective bacterial isolates in the suppression of broomrape, (b) evaluating induced systemic resistance against broomrape and (c) comparing the selected bacterium isolate with plant chemical inducers. Fifteen plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) were examined to assess their biocontrol potential against Egyptian broomrape ( Phelipanche aegyptiaca ). Ten isolates significantly reduced the broomrape biomass compared to the control. The Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124 reduced the dry weight of broomrape plants from 2.15 g in control to 0.45 g. Bacillus megaterium B6 was the best isolate in reducing the number of broomrape tubercles. In addition, the activity of three selected bacterial isolates was investigated in induced systemic resistance to broomrape by split‐root method. The Bacillus pumilus INR7 reduced the number of visible broomrape tubercles by 90%, and B. megaterium B71 and L. boronitolerans B124 were the next two in rank. Compared with the control, L. boronitolerans B124 reduced the dry weight of broomrape from 1.49 g in control to 0.39 g. In a subsequent experiment, L. boronitolerans B124 was evaluated along with some resistance‐inducing volatile compounds. Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124 decreased the number of broomrapes by 87% on average, while the lowest dry weight of broomrape was observed in methyl jasmonate treatment. In conclusion, PGPR have considerable potential to be used in the integrated management of broomrape. It is also possible to use a mixture of rhizobacteria and defence inducers, such as biogenic volatiles as a promising approach in the management of this noxious parasitic weed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten bacterial isolates significantly reduced Egyptian broomrape biomass relative to control in tomato assays.

Treatment
Ten isolatese0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ten isolates significantly reduced the broomrape biomass compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124 reduced broomrape dry weight from 2.15 g to 0.45 g.

Treatment
Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Second interactor
Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124Lysinibacillus boronitoleranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry weight of broomrape plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.45 ge0
Qualifier
2.15 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124 reduced the dry weight of broomrape plants from 2.15 g in control to 0.45 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus megaterium B6 was the best isolate for reducing broomrape tubercle number.

Treatment
Bacillus megaterium B6e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Second interactor
Bacillus megaterium B6Priestia megateriume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of broomrape tuberclese0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · Second interactorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus megaterium B6 was the best isolate in reducing the number of broomrape tubercles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pumilus INR7 reduced visible broomrape tubercles by 90%.

Treatment
Bacillus pumilus INR7e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Second interactor
Bacillus pumilus INR7Bacillus pumilus INR7e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of visible broomrape tuberclese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Bacillus pumilus INR7 reduced the number of visible broomrape tubercles by 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus megaterium B71 ranked next after B. pumilus INR7 in reducing broomrape tubercles.

Treatment
B. megaterium B71e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
next two in ranke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Bacillus pumilus INR7 reduced the number of visible broomrape tubercles by 90%, and B. megaterium B71 and L. boronitolerans B124 were the next two in rank.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124 ranked after B. pumilus INR7 in reducing broomrape tubercles.

Treatment
L. boronitolerans B124e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
next two in ranke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Bacillus pumilus INR7 reduced the number of visible broomrape tubercles by 90%, and B. megaterium B71 and L. boronitolerans B124 were the next two in rank.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. boronitolerans B124 reduced broomrape dry weight from 1.49 g to 0.39 g in the systemic resistance assay.

Treatment
L. boronitolerans B124e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Second interactor
L. boronitolerans B124Lysinibacillus boronitoleranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry weight of broomrapee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.39 ge0
Qualifier
1.49 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, L. boronitolerans B124 reduced the dry weight of broomrape from 1.49 g in control to 0.39 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124 decreased broomrape number by 87% on average.

Treatment
Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124e0
Interactor
broomrapese0parasite
Second interactor
Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124Lysinibacillus boronitoleranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of broomrapese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysinibacillus boronitolerans B124 decreased the number of broomrapes by 87% on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl jasmonate treatment yielded the lowest broomrape dry weight.

Treatment
methyl jasmonate treatmente0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
dry weight of broomrapee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest dry weight of broomrape was observed in methyl jasmonate treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed PGPR for integrated broomrape management.

Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
integrated management of broomrapee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR have considerable potential to be used in the integrated management of broomrape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed combining rhizobacteria and defense inducers for broomrape management.

Interactor
parasitic weede0parasite
Outcome
mixture of rhizobacteria and defence inducerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is also possible to use a mixture of rhizobacteria and defence inducers, such as biogenic volatiles as a promising approach in the management of this noxious parasitic weed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1896 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑

(-)-methyl jasmonate · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.