Paper · 2025 · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

Enhancing fertilizer nitrogen environmental safety and soil sustainability: The role of no-tillage with straw mulching in maize production

Xueying Wang; Jiaqi Chen; Lu Yuan; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The fixation/immobilization and release/remineralization of fertilizer-derived mineral nitrogen (N) to fixed ammonium (NH 4 + ) and organic N pools are crucial in fertilizer utilization and crop N uptake. Although straw mulching reduces the gaseous and leaching losses of fertilizer N from farmlands, the dynamics of fertilizer-derived fixed NH 4 + and organic N and their roles in fertilizer N retention and supply in soil-crop systems remain unclear. This study utilized 15 N-isotope labeling in Northeast China to assess how conventional ridge tillage (RT) and no-till systems with different straw mulch levels (NT0, NT33, NT67, and NT100) affect the accumulation and release of fertilizer-derived fixed NH 4 + and organic N. Compared to RT and NT0, no-tillage with straw mulching increased the conversion of fertilizer N to fixed NH 4 + and organic N by an average of 15.3 % and 36.5 %, respectively, at a soil depth of 0–40 cm during the maize seedling stage. The higher net release of fertilizer-derived fixed NH 4 + (average of 94.1 %) in a 0–40 cm soil layer suggested a high short-term N supply potential from this source during the growing season . Conversely, the limited net release of fertilizer-sourced organic N via remineralization during the vegetative phase (average of 51.3 %), coupled with the net re-immobilization of fertilizer N from the tasseling to ripening stages (average of 22.9 %), indicated a long-term N supply capacity of fertilizer-derived organic N for subsequent crops. No-tillage combined with straw mulching significantly enhanced fertilizer N use efficiency and maize yield by averages of 10.2 % and 14.8 %, respectively, compared to those of RT and NT0, demonstrating the effectiveness of these practices in optimizing fertilizer application and ensuring high crop productivity. Moreover, these conservation tillage practices enhanced fertilizer utilization and achieved sustainable agricultural outcomes by regulating the conversion and release of fertilizer N to soil-fixed NH 4 + and organic N pools and by improving other soil properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage with straw mulching increased conversion of fertilizer N to fixed NH 4 + by 15.3% relative to RT and NT0 in maize at the seedling stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
maize seedling stagee0
Treatment
no-tillage with straw mulchinge0
Outcome
conversion of fertilizer N to fixed NH 4 +e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.3 %e0
Comparator
RT and NT0e0
Setting
Northeast Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to RT and NT0, no-tillage with straw mulching increased the conversion of fertilizer N to fixed NH 4 + and organic N by an average of 15.3 % and 36.5 %, respectively, at a soil depth of 0–40 cm during the maize seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study utilized 15 N-isotope labeling in Northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage with straw mulching increased conversion of fertilizer N to organic N by 36.5% relative to RT and NT0 in maize at the seedling stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
maize seedling stagee0
Treatment
no-tillage with straw mulchinge0
Outcome
conversion of fertilizer N to fixed NH 4 + and organic Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.5 %e0
Comparator
RT and NT0e0
Setting
Northeast Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to RT and NT0, no-tillage with straw mulching increased the conversion of fertilizer N to fixed NH 4 + and organic N by an average of 15.3 % and 36.5 %, respectively, at a soil depth of 0–40 cm during the maize seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study utilized 15 N-isotope labeling in Northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net release of fertilizer-derived fixed NH4+ was higher (94.1%) in the 0-40 cm soil layer of maize fields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
net release of fertilizer-derived fixed NH 4 +e2
Direction
highere2
Value
94.1 %e2
Setting
0–40 cm soil layere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The higher net release of fertilizer-derived fixed NH 4 + (average of 94.1 %) in a 0–40 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net release of fertilizer-sourced organic N via remineralization was limited (51.3%) during the vegetative phase of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
vegetative phasee3
Outcome
net release of fertilizer-sourced organic N via remineralizatione3
Direction
limitede3
Value
51.3 %e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the limited net release of fertilizer-sourced organic N via remineralization during the vegetative phase (average of 51.3 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net re-immobilization of fertilizer N was 22.9% from tasseling to ripening in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
tasseling to ripening stagese4
Outcome
net re-immobilization of fertilizer Ne4
Value
22.9 %e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the net re-immobilization of fertilizer N from the tasseling to ripening stages (average of 22.9 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage combined with straw mulching significantly enhanced fertilizer N use efficiency by 10.2% compared to RT and NT0 in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
No-tillage combined with straw mulchinge5
Outcome
fertilizer N use efficiencye5
Direction
enhancede5
Value
10.2 %e5
Comparator
RT and NT0e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“No-tillage combined with straw mulching significantly enhanced fertilizer N use efficiency and maize yield by averages of 10.2 % and 14.8 %, respectively, compared to those of RT and NT0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage combined with straw mulching significantly enhanced maize yield by 14.8% compared to RT and NT0.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
No-tillage combined with straw mulchinge5
Outcome
maize yielde5
Direction
enhancede5
Value
14.8 %e5
Comparator
RT and NT0e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“No-tillage combined with straw mulching significantly enhanced fertilizer N use efficiency and maize yield by averages of 10.2 % and 14.8 %, respectively, compared to those of RT and NT0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–138 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.