Abstract
Abstract Studies on the influence of basic tillage systems on changes in soil fertility and biometric indicators of cultivated crops have been conducted at the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “National Grain Center named after P. P. Lukyanenko” in the experimental fields of the Agriculture laboratory since 2008. The article presents part of the studies for the period from 2018 to 2020, during which it was determined that the minimum mulching basic tillage system with decompaction is not inferior in agronomic efficiency to the traditional system. Observations of the growth and development of corn for grain showed the priority of this tillage. The grain yield obtained over the years of research (2018-2020) on decompaction technology was formed at the level of traditional tillage (conditionally accepted as control) and amounted to 55.9 c/ha, significantly exceeding the minimum by 2.2 c/ha, while having a high content of crude protein in the grain - 11.2%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum mulching basic tillage with decompaction was not inferior in agronomic efficiency to the traditional tillage system for corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- minimum mulching basic tillage system with decompactione0
- Outcome
- agronomic efficiencye0
- Direction
- not inferiore0
- Comparator
- traditional systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“corn”
e0“the minimum mulching basic tillage system with decompaction is not inferior in agronomic efficiency to the traditional system”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn grain yield on decompaction technology was at the level of traditional tillage (control), 55.9 c/ha.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- decompaction technologye1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- at the level ofe1
- Value
- 55.9 c/hae1
- Comparator
- traditional tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“corn”
e0“The grain yield obtained”
e1“on decompaction technology was formed at the level of traditional tillage (conditionally accepted as control) and amounted to 55.9 c/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn grain yield on decompaction technology significantly exceeded the minimum tillage by 2.2 c/ha.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- decompaction technologye1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- exceedinge2
- Value
- 2.2 c/hae2
- Comparator
- the minimume2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“corn”
e0“The grain yield obtained”
e1“on decompaction technology”
e2“significantly exceeding the minimum by 2.2 c/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn grain under decompaction technology had a high crude protein content of 11.2%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- content of crude protein in the graine0
- Value
- 11.2%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“corn”
e0“a high content of crude protein in the grain - 11.2%”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.