Paper · 1984 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Crop Residue Removal and Soil Productivity with No‐Till Corn, Sorghum, and Soybean

J. W. Doran; W. W. Wilhelm; J. F. Power

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
99
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Crop residues have been considered during the past decade as alternate energy sources to supplement dwindling fossil fuel sources and enhance energy independence in the United States. Agricultural scientists have demonstrated the importance of crop residues in reducing soil erosion, enhancing the soil physical environment for plant growth, and as a reserve for major crop nutrients. In eastern Nebraska, we evaluated the effects of various amounts of surface crop residues (aboveground dry matter remaining after harvest) on dry‐land production of no‐till corn ( Zea mays L.), sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merrill] over a 3‐yr period. Where crop residues were completely removed after harvest, average grain and residue yields of corn and soybean were 22 and 24% lower, respectively, than where residues were not removed. Removal of 50% or addition of 50% (150%) surface crop residues had little or no effect on crop yields compared to no removal (100%). Sorghum yields were unaffected by residue removal, but stands were significantly less at the 150% residue rate. Yield reductions for corn and soybean resulted primarily from decreased soil water storage and excessive surface soil temperatures where residues were completely removed. Sorghum tolerated conditions of temperature and water stress better than other crops. Removal of surface crop residues can seriously reduce corn and soybean yields in climates where stressful conditions occur during the growing season. Considerations for using crop residues as alternate energy sources should include these potential reductions in grain and residue yields, as well as increased nutrient removal and greater potential for soil erosion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete removal of crop residues reduced corn grain and residue yields by 22 percent relative to retained residues.

Treatment
crop residues were completely removed after harveste1
Outcome
grain and residue yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
22e1
Comparator
residues were not removede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Where crop residues were completely removed after harvest, average grain and residue yields of corn and soybean were 22 and 24% lower, respectively, than where residues were not removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete removal of crop residues reduced soybean grain and residue yields by 24 percent relative to retained residues.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
crop residues were completely removed after harveste1
Outcome
grain and residue yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
24e1
Comparator
residues were not removede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Where crop residues were completely removed after harvest, average grain and residue yields of corn and soybean were 22 and 24% lower, respectively, than where residues were not removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 50 percent or adding 50 percent of surface residues had little or no effect on crop yields compared with no removal.

Taxon
Corn, Sorghum, and SoybeanGlycine maxSorghumZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
Removal of 50% or addition of 50% (150%) surface crop residuese2
Outcome
crop yieldse2
Direction
little or no effecte2
Comparator
no removal (100%)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Removal of 50% or addition of 50% (150%) surface crop residues had little or no effect on crop yields compared to no removal (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn, Sorghum, and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue removal did not change sorghum yields.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume3
Treatment
residue removale3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
unaffectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Sorghum yields were unaffected by residue removal, but stands were significantly less at the 150% residue rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum stands were significantly lower at the 150 percent residue rate.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume3
Treatment
150% residue ratee3
Outcome
standse3
Direction
lesse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Sorghum yields were unaffected by residue removal, but stands were significantly less at the 150% residue rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1118 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reductions for corn and soybean after residue removal resulted mainly from decreased soil water storage and excessive surface soil temperatures.

Outcome
Yield reductionse4
Qualifier
decreased soil water storage and excessive surface soil temperaturese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Yield reductions for corn and soybean resulted primarily from decreased soil water storage and excessive surface soil temperatures where residues were completely removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1289 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum tolerated temperature and water stress better than other crops.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume5
Treatment
temperature and water stresse5
Outcome
tolerated conditionse5
Direction
bettere5
Comparator
other cropse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Sorghum tolerated conditions of temperature and water stress better than other crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing surface crop residues can seriously reduce corn and soybean yields in climates with stressful growing seasons.

Treatment
Removal of surface crop residuese6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
reducee6
Qualifier
climates where stressful conditions occur during the growing seasone6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Removal of surface crop residues can seriously reduce corn and soybean yields in climates where stressful conditions occur during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1525 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Potential reductions in grain and residue yields should be considered when using crop residues as alternate energy sources.

Taxon
Corn, Sorghum, and SoybeanGlycine maxSorghumZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
using crop residues as alternate energy sourcese7
Outcome
grain and residue yieldse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Considerations for using crop residues as alternate energy sources should include these potential reductions in grain and residue yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn, Sorghum, and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · SorghumResults differ

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

organic · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 330 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.