Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Does Nitrogen Fertilization Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat?

Aixia Xu; Yafei Chen; Xuexue Wei; et al.

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To investigate the effects and mechanism of prolonged inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilization on the N-use efficiency of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a long-term study initiated in 2003 was conducted. The study analyzed how N fertilization affects dry matter translocation, N translocation, soil NO3-N, and N-use efficiency. Five different N-fertilizer rate treatments were tested: N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210, corresponding to annual N fertilizer doses of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively. Results showed that increasing N-fertilizer rates significantly enhanced the two-year average dry matter accumulation amount (DMA) at maturity by 22.97–56.25% and pre-flowering crop growth rate (CGR) by 17.11–92.85%, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1. However, no significant correlation was observed between the dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE) and wheat grain yield. Both insufficient and excessive N applications resulted in an imbalanced N distribution favoring vegetative growth over reproductive growth, thus negatively impacting N-use efficiency. At maturity, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average N accumulation amount (NAA) by 52.04–129.98%, with no further increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1. N fertilization also improved the two-year average N translocation efficiency (NTE) by 56.89–63.80% and the N contribution proportion (NCP) of wheat vegetative organs by 27.79–57.83%, peaking in the lower-N treatment (N52.5). However, high-N treatment (N210) led to an increase in NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer, with an increase of 26.27% in 2018 and 122.44% in 2019. This higher soil NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm layer decreased NHI, NUE, NAE, NPFP, and NMB. Additionally, N fertilization significantly reduced the two-year average N harvest index (NHI) by 9.89–12.85% and N utilization efficiency (NUE) by 11.14–20.79%, both decreasing with higher N application rates. The NAA followed the trend of anthesis > maturity > jointing. At the 105 kg N ha−1 rate, the highest N agronomic efficiency (NAE) (9.31 kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE) (38.32%), and N marginal benefit (NMB) (10.67 kg kg−1) were observed. Higher dry matter translocation amount (DTA) and N translocation amount (NTA) reduced NHI and NUE, whereas higher NTE improved NHI, NUE, and N partial factor productivity (NPFP). Overall, N fertilization enhanced N-use efficiency in spring wheat by improving N translocation rather than dry matter translocation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates increased dry matter accumulation at maturity by 22.97–56.25%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing N-fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation amount (DMA)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.97–56.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing N-fertilizer rates significantly enhanced the two-year average dry matter accumulation amount (DMA) at maturity by 22.97–56.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates increased pre-flowering crop growth rate by 17.11–92.85%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen Fertilizationt0
Outcome
pre-flowering crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.11–92.85%e0
Qualifier
no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-flowering crop growth rate (CGR) by 17.11–92.85%, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilization Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat?”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter translocation efficiency was not significantly correlated with grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Comparator
dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE)e0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant correlation was observed between the dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE) and wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insufficient and excessive nitrogen favored vegetative over reproductive growth, lowering nitrogen-use efficiency.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
insufficient and excessive N applicationse0
Outcome
N-use efficiencye0
Qualifier
imbalanced N distribution favoring vegetative growth over reproductive growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both insufficient and excessive N applications resulted in an imbalanced N distribution favoring vegetative growth over reproductive growth, thus negatively impacting N-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased nitrogen accumulation at maturity by 52.04–129.98%, with no further rise above 105 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N-fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
N accumulation amount (NAA)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
52.04–129.98%e0
Qualifier
no further increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average N accumulation amount (NAA) by 52.04–129.98%, with no further increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization improved nitrogen translocation efficiency by 56.89–63.80%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
N translocation efficiency (NTE)e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
56.89–63.80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization also improved the two-year average N translocation efficiency (NTE) by 56.89–63.80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization improved vegetative-organ nitrogen contribution by 27.79–57.83%, peaking at N52.5.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
vegetative organse0
Treatment
lower-N treatment (N52.5)e0
Outcome
N contribution proportion (NCP)e0
Direction
peakinge0
Value
27.79–57.83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N contribution proportion (NCP) of wheat vegetative organs by 27.79–57.83%, peaking in the lower-N treatment (N52.5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N210 increased soil nitrate accumulation by 26.27% in 2018.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high-N treatment (N210)e0
Outcome
NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26.27%e0
Qualifier
2018e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high-N treatment (N210) led to an increase in NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer, with an increase of 26.27% in 2018 and 122.44% in 2019.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N210 increased soil nitrate accumulation by 122.44% in 2019.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high-N treatment (N210)e0
Outcome
NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
122.44%e0
Qualifier
2019e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high-N treatment (N210) led to an increase in NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer, with an increase of 26.27% in 2018 and 122.44% in 2019.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater soil nitrate accumulation lowered NHI, NUE, NAE, NPFP and NMB.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Compound
soil NO3-Ne0
Outcome
NHI, NUE, NAE, NPFP, and NMBe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This higher soil NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm layer decreased NHI, NUE, NAE, NPFP, and NMB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization reduced nitrogen harvest index by 9.89–12.85%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
N harvest index (NHI)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9.89–12.85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization significantly reduced the two-year average N harvest index (NHI) by 9.89–12.85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization reduced nitrogen utilization efficiency by 11.14–20.79%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen Fertilizationt0
Outcome
N utilization efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
11.14–20.79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N utilization efficiency (NUE) by 11.14–20.79%, both decreasing with higher N application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen Fertilization Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat?”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen accumulation ranked anthesis above maturity above jointing.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
anthesis > maturity > jointinge0
Outcome
NAAe0
Direction
anthesis > maturity > jointinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NAA followed the trend of anthesis > maturity > jointing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 105 kg N ha−1 nitrogen agronomic efficiency peaked at 9.31 kg kg−1.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
105 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
N agronomic efficiency (NAE)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.31 kg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 105 kg N ha−1 rate, the highest N agronomic efficiency (NAE) (9.31 kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE) (38.32%), and N marginal benefit (NMB) (10.67 kg kg−1) were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 105 kg N ha−1 nitrogen recovery efficiency peaked at 38.32%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
105 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
N recovery efficiency (NRE)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
38.32%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 105 kg N ha−1 rate, the highest N agronomic efficiency (NAE) (9.31 kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE) (38.32%), and N marginal benefit (NMB) (10.67 kg kg−1) were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 105 kg N ha−1 nitrogen marginal benefit peaked at 10.67 kg kg−1.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
105 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
N marginal benefit (NMB)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.67 kg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 105 kg N ha−1 rate, the highest N agronomic efficiency (NAE) (9.31 kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE) (38.32%), and N marginal benefit (NMB) (10.67 kg kg−1) were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher dry matter and nitrogen translocation amounts reduced NHI and NUE.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
dry matter translocation amount (DTA) and N translocation amount (NTA)e0
Outcome
NHI and NUEe0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher dry matter translocation amount (DTA) and N translocation amount (NTA) reduced NHI and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2221–2318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen translocation efficiency improved NHI, NUE and NPFP.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NTEe0
Outcome
NHI, NUE, and N partial factor productivity (NPFP)e0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher NTE improved NHI, NUE, and N partial factor productivity (NPFP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude nitrogen fertilization enhanced wheat nitrogen use through nitrogen rather than dry matter translocation.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
N-use efficiencye0
Qualifier
improving N translocation rather than dry matter translocatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization enhanced N-use efficiency in spring wheat by improving N translocation rather than dry matter translocation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2409–2533 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.