Paper · 2026 · Soil Systems

Wheat Yield Responses to NPK Fertilizers and Nutrient Omissions for QUEFTS Model Validation in Tigray, North Ethiopia

Shimbahri Mesfin; Mitiku Haile; Girmay Gebresamuel; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Improving crop productivity largely depends on understanding soil fertility constraints and the effects of nutrient management on yield performance. Accurate determination of existing soil nutrient status and targeted application of limiting nutrients are essential for enhancing wheat (Triticum spp.) productivity. However, the specific effects of omitting one of the macronutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), or potassium (K) on wheat yield have not been investigated in the target area. This study employed the Quantitative Evaluation of the Fertility of Tropical Soils (QUEFTS) model to estimate the N, P, and K fertilizer requirements needed to achieve a predefined wheat yield target. The objectives were to: (i) evaluate yield responses to complete versus nutrient omission (N, P, or K) fertilization treatments, and (ii) analyze corresponding nutrient uptake and use efficiency dynamics. The experimental treatments included: (1) full NPK fertilization, (2) NP only (K omitted), (3) NK only (P omitted), (4) PK only (N omitted), and (5) an unfertilized control. Topsoil samples were analyzed and used as inputs for the QUEFTS model. Yield and agronomic data, as well as nutrient uptake and use efficiency, were measured. Model performance was validated using standard statistical metrics. Results showed that full NPK application significantly (p < 0.05) improved yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake compared to omission treatments and the control. The strong agreement between QUEFTS-predicted and observed yields highlights the model’s potential as a reliable, cost-effective decision-support tool for optimizing site-specific fertilizer recommendations. These findings demonstrate that balanced NPK fertilization markedly boosts wheat yield and nutrient uptake, while the QUEFTS model provides a powerful, reliable tool for tailoring fertilizer management to local soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NPK fertilization significantly improved wheat yield and yield components compared with nutrient omission treatments and the control in Tigray.

Treatment
full NPK applicatione1
Outcome
yield, yield componentse1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
omission treatments and the controle1
Setting
Tigrayt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Responses to NPK Fertilizers and Nutrient Omissions for QUEFTS Model Validation in Tigray, North Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“essential for enhancing wheat (Triticum spp.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that full NPK application significantly (p < 0.05) improved yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake compared to omission treatments and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NPK fertilization significantly improved wheat nutrient uptake compared with nutrient omission treatments and the control.

Treatment
full NPK applicatione1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
omission treatments and the controle1
Setting
Tigrayt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Yield Responses to NPK Fertilizers and Nutrient Omissions for QUEFTS Model Validation in Tigray, North Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“essential for enhancing wheat (Triticum spp.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that full NPK application significantly (p < 0.05) improved yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake compared to omission treatments and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1475 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The QUEFTS-predicted wheat yields showed strong agreement with observed yields.

Outcome
agreement between QUEFTS-predicted and observed yieldse2
Qualifier
stronge2
Comparator
observed yieldse2

Verbatim

e0

“essential for enhancing wheat (Triticum spp.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“The strong agreement between QUEFTS-predicted and observed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1542 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The QUEFTS model shows potential as a reliable, cost-effective decision-support tool for site-specific wheat fertilizer recommendations.

Outcome
decision-support toole3
Qualifier
reliable, cost-effectivee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“as a reliable, cost-effective decision-support tool for optimizing site-specific fertilizer recommendations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1683 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.