Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Biochar derived from olive oil pomace mitigates salt stress on seedling growth of forage pea

Mehmet Kerim Gullap; Tuba Karabacak; Sedat Severoglu; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Studies are being conducted to develop strategies to reduce the adverse effects of salinity stress. In the present study, it was aimed to determine the interactive effects of salinity stress with biochar on plant growth—the physiological and biochemical attributes of forage peas ( Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.). Salt applications were carried out with irrigation water at concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mM NaCl. The experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design with three applications [control: 0 (B 0 ), 2.5% biochar (B 1 ), and 5% biochar (B 2 )], five salt doses [0 (S 0 ), 25 (S 1 ), 50 (S 2 ), 75 (S 3 ), and 100 (S 4 ) mM NaCl], and three replications, arranged in a 3 × 5 factorial arrangement. In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1 . The root fresh (0.59 g/plant) and dry weight (0.36 g/plant) were determined to be the highest in the B 1 application, both in non-saline and saline environments. A decrease in plant chlorophyll content in forage pea plants was observed parallel to the increasing salt levels. Specifically, lower H 2 O 2 , MDA, and proline content were determined at all salt levels with biochar applications, while in the B 0 application these values were recorded at the highest levels. Furthermore, in the study, it was observed that the CAT, POD, and SOD enzyme activities were at their lowest levels at all salt levels with the biochar application, while in the B 0 application, these values were determined to be at the highest levels. There was a significant decrease in plant mineral content, excluding Cl and Na, parallel to the increasing salt levels. The findings of the study indicate that biochar amendment can enhance forage peas’ growth by modulating the plant physiology and biochemistry under salt stress. Considering the plant growth parameters, no significant difference was detected between 2.5% and 5% biochar application. Therefore, application of 2.5 biochar may be recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, 2.5% biochar (B 1) gave the highest plant height in forage pea seedlings, 18.75 cm.

Taxon
forage peae1
Treatment
application of B 1e1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
18.75 cme1
Qualifier
In the salt-stressed environmente1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, biochar B 1 gave the highest stem diameter in forage pea seedlings, 1.71 mm.

Taxon
forage peae1
Treatment
application of B 1e1
Outcome
stem diametere1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.71 mme1
Qualifier
In the salt-stressed environmente1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar B 1 gave the highest root fresh weight in forage pea seedlings, 0.59 g/plant, in non-saline and saline environments.

Taxon
forage peae1
Treatment
B 1 applicatione2
Outcome
root freshe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
0.59 g/plante2
Qualifier
both in non-saline and saline environmentse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“The root fresh (0.59 g/plant) and dry weight (0.36 g/plant) were determined to be the highest in the B 1 application, both in non-saline and saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar B 1 gave the highest root dry weight in forage pea seedlings, 0.36 g/plant, in non-saline and saline environments.

Taxon
forage peae1
Organ / stage
roote2
Treatment
B 1 applicatione2
Outcome
dry weighte2
Direction
higheste2
Value
0.36 g/plante2
Qualifier
both in non-saline and saline environmentse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“The root fresh (0.59 g/plant) and dry weight (0.36 g/plant) were determined to be the highest in the B 1 application, both in non-saline and saline environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage pea plant chlorophyll content decreased as salt levels increased.

Taxon
forage pea plantse3
Treatment
increasing salt levelse3
Outcome
plant chlorophyll contente3
Direction
decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“A decrease in plant chlorophyll content in forage pea plants was observed parallel to the increasing salt levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar applications lowered H2O2, MDA and proline content at all salt levels relative to the B 0 application.

Taxon
forage peae1
Treatment
biochar applicationse4
Outcome
H 2 O 2 , MDA, and proline contente4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
B 0 applicatione4

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
e4

“lower H 2 O 2 , MDA, and proline content were determined at all salt levels with biochar applications, while in the B 0 application these values were recorded at the highest levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application lowered CAT, POD and SOD enzyme activities at all salt levels relative to the B 0 application.

Taxon
forage peae1
Treatment
biochar applicatione5
Outcome
CAT, POD, and SOD enzyme activitiese5
Direction
loweste5
Comparator
B 0 applicatione5

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
e5

“CAT, POD, and SOD enzyme activities were at their lowest levels at all salt levels with the biochar application, while in the B 0 application, these values were determined to be at the highest levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant mineral content decreased significantly as salt levels increased, excluding Cl and Na.

Taxon
forage pea plantse3
Treatment
increasing salt levelse6
Outcome
plant mineral contente6
Direction
decreasee6
Qualifier
excluding Cl and Nae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“A decrease in plant chlorophyll content in forage pea plants was observed parallel to the increasing salt levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1175 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was a significant decrease in plant mineral content, excluding Cl and Na, parallel to the increasing salt levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Between 2.5% and 5% biochar there was no significant difference in plant growth parameters.

Taxon
forage peae1
Treatment
5% biochar applicatione7
Outcome
plant growth parameterse7
Direction
no significant differencee7
Comparator
2.5%e7

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
e7

“Considering the plant growth parameters, no significant difference was detected between 2.5% and 5% biochar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2026 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 2.5 biochar may be recommended for forage pea under salinity.

Taxon
forage peae1
Outcome
application of 2.5 biochare0

Verbatim

e1

“In the salt-stressed environment, the highest plant height (18.75 cm) and stem diameter (1.71 mm) in forage pea seedlings were obtained with the application of B 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–898 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 2.5 biochar may be recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2084 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 1 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

biochar · physiology: oxidative · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · soil: biology · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

13 papers: 0 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.