Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Agronomy

Effect of Biochar Application on Growth of Garden Pea (Pisum sativumL.) in Acidic Soils of Bule Woreda Gedeo Zone Southern Ethiopia

Tariku Berihun; Shiferaw Tolosa; Muluken Tadele; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this experiment was to study the effect of types and rates of biochar on growth, yield, and yield component of garden pea at Bule wereda, Southern Ethiopia. The treatments consist of two types of biochar (corncobs and Lantana camara ) and four rates of biochar (0, 6, 12, and 18 t ha −1 ). The experiment was laid out as a randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement with three replications. Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–30 cm and germination parameter and phonology of garden pea were recorded. The result showed that soil bulk density, porosity, pH, and exchangeable acidity were significantly (P<0.001) affected by biochar application. The result also showed that maximum germination percentage of garden pea seeds (95.23%) was recorded at 18 t ha −1 of Lantana biochar. The shoot length was significantly (P<0.05) affected at 15 days and 30 days of biochar application. Moreover, fresh shoot weight and dry root biomass, number of seeds per pod, and grain yield of garden pea were significantly affected (P<0.05). Of the substrate and application rate applied, Lantana camara 12 t ha −1 and Lantana camara 18 t ha −1 significantly increased yield of garden pea. Thus, further studies on effect of different biochars and their specific role are suggested to increase crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly affected soil bulk density, porosity, pH, and exchangeable acidity.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
soil bulk density, porosity, pH, and exchangeable aciditye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil bulk density, porosity, pH, and exchangeable acidity were significantly (P<0.001) affected by biochar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth of Garden Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana biochar at 18 t ha −1 produced 95.23% garden pea seed germination.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
18 t ha −1 of Lantana biochare0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
95.23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum germination percentage of garden pea seeds (95.23%) was recorded at 18 t ha −1 of Lantana biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly affected shoot length at 15 and 30 days.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Qualifier
15 days and 30 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot length was significantly (P<0.05) affected at 15 days and 30 days of biochar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garden Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly affected fresh shoot weight and dry root biomass.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
biochar applicationt0
Outcome
fresh shoot weight and dry root biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh shoot weight and dry root biomass, number of seeds per pod, and grain yield of garden pea were significantly affected (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochar Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly affected garden pea seeds per pod and grain yield.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
biochar applicationt0
Outcome
number of seeds per pod, and grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds per pod, and grain yield of garden pea were significantly affected (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biochar Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana camara biochar at 12 t ha −1 significantly increased pea yield.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
Lantana camara 12 t ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lantana camara 12 t ha −1 and Lantana camara 18 t ha −1 significantly increased yield of garden pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana camara biochar at 18 t ha −1 significantly increased pea yield.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
Lantana camara 18 t ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lantana camara 12 t ha −1 and Lantana camara 18 t ha −1 significantly increased yield of garden pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1206 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.