Abstract
The present investigationwas carried out at Heera Puri research field, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, District Gorakhpur during Kharif, 2023. In the kharif season of 2023, there was a rice crop, the relative effectiveness of six insecticides viz. flubendiamide 39.35% SC, NSKE 5%, cartap hydrochloride 50% SP, spinosad 45 SC, neem oil 5%, and emamectin benzoate 5% SC with control was assessed in the field against the rice caseworm. Spinosad 45 SC (3.95 %) was found to be the most effective insecticide treatment among all pesticides for controlling the rice caseworm, as it has recorded the lowest infestation. The second-best treatment was emamectin benzoate 5% SC (4.07 %), followed by flubendiamide 39.35% SC (4.21%), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (4.32%), Neem oil 5% (4.75%), and NSKE 5% (4.85%). The significantly higher grain yield was obtained in Spinosad 45 SC (55.94 q/ha) treated plots which are followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SC (54.19%), flubendiamide 39.35% SC (54.02 q/ha), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (53.21 q/ha), neem oil 5% (52.36 q/ha) and NSKE 5% (51.27 q/ha). The economics of various treatments based on net profit and cost of plant protection revealed that the highest cost: benefit ratio Spinosad 45 SC (1:4.47) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SC (1:3.96), followed by Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (1: 2.06), Neem oil 5% (1: 1.25), NSKE 5% (1: 1.23) and the lowest cost-benefit ratio was observed in Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (1: 0.88).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC had the lowest rice caseworm infestation, 3.95%.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- Spinosad 45 SCe0
- Interactor
- rice caseworme0pest
- Outcome
- rice caseworme0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 3.95 %e0
- Comparator
- all pesticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad 45 SC (3.95 %) was found to be the most effective insecticide treatment among all pesticides for controlling the rice caseworm, as it has recorded the lowest infestation.”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
emamectin benzoate 5% SC had rice caseworm infestation of 4.07 %.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- emamectin benzoate 5% SCe0
- Interactor
- Rice Casewormt0pest
- Outcome
- Rice Casewormt0
- Value
- 4.07 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The second-best treatment was emamectin benzoate 5% SC (4.07 %), followed by flubendiamide 39.35% SC (4.21%), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (4.32%), Neem oil 5% (4.75%), and NSKE 5% (4.85%).”
t0“Management of Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
flubendiamide 39.35% SC had rice caseworm infestation of 4.21%.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 39.35% SCe0
- Interactor
- Rice Casewormt0pest
- Outcome
- Rice Casewormt0
- Value
- 4.21%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The second-best treatment was emamectin benzoate 5% SC (4.07 %), followed by flubendiamide 39.35% SC (4.21%), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (4.32%), Neem oil 5% (4.75%), and NSKE 5% (4.85%).”
t0“Management of Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
cartap hydrochloride 50% SP had rice caseworm infestation of 4.32%.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- cartap hydrochloride 50% SPe0
- Interactor
- Rice Casewormt0pest
- Outcome
- Rice Casewormt0
- Value
- 4.32%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The second-best treatment was emamectin benzoate 5% SC (4.07 %), followed by flubendiamide 39.35% SC (4.21%), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (4.32%), Neem oil 5% (4.75%), and NSKE 5% (4.85%).”
t0“Management of Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil 5% had rice caseworm infestation of 4.75%.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Neem oil 5%e0
- Interactor
- Rice Casewormt0pest
- Outcome
- Rice Casewormt0
- Value
- 4.75%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The second-best treatment was emamectin benzoate 5% SC (4.07 %), followed by flubendiamide 39.35% SC (4.21%), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (4.32%), Neem oil 5% (4.75%), and NSKE 5% (4.85%).”
t0“Management of Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE 5% had rice caseworm infestation of 4.85%.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- NSKE 5%e0
- Interactor
- Rice Casewormt0pest
- Outcome
- Rice Casewormt0
- Value
- 4.85%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The second-best treatment was emamectin benzoate 5% SC (4.07 %), followed by flubendiamide 39.35% SC (4.21%), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (4.32%), Neem oil 5% (4.75%), and NSKE 5% (4.85%).”
t0“Management of Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC treated plots yielded 55.94 q/ha grain.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45 SCe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 55.94 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher grain yield was obtained in Spinosad 45 SC (55.94 q/ha) treated plots which are followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SC (54.19%), flubendiamide 39.35% SC (54.02 q/ha), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (53.21 q/ha), neem oil 5% (52.36 q/ha) and NSKE 5% (51.27 q/ha).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
emamectin benzoate 5% SC treated plots yielded 54.19% grain.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- emamectin benzoate 5% SCe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 54.19%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher grain yield was obtained in Spinosad 45 SC (55.94 q/ha) treated plots which are followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SC (54.19%), flubendiamide 39.35% SC (54.02 q/ha), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (53.21 q/ha), neem oil 5% (52.36 q/ha) and NSKE 5% (51.27 q/ha).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
flubendiamide 39.35% SC treated plots yielded 54.02 q/ha grain.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 39.35% SCe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 54.02 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher grain yield was obtained in Spinosad 45 SC (55.94 q/ha) treated plots which are followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SC (54.19%), flubendiamide 39.35% SC (54.02 q/ha), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (53.21 q/ha), neem oil 5% (52.36 q/ha) and NSKE 5% (51.27 q/ha).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
cartap hydrochloride 50% SP treated plots yielded 53.21 q/ha grain.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- cartap hydrochloride 50% SPe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 53.21 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher grain yield was obtained in Spinosad 45 SC (55.94 q/ha) treated plots which are followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SC (54.19%), flubendiamide 39.35% SC (54.02 q/ha), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (53.21 q/ha), neem oil 5% (52.36 q/ha) and NSKE 5% (51.27 q/ha).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
neem oil 5% treated plots yielded 52.36 q/ha grain.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher grain yield was obtained in Spinosad 45 SC (55.94 q/ha) treated plots which are followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SC (54.19%), flubendiamide 39.35% SC (54.02 q/ha), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (53.21 q/ha), neem oil 5% (52.36 q/ha) and NSKE 5% (51.27 q/ha).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE 5% treated plots yielded 51.27 q/ha grain.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher grain yield was obtained in Spinosad 45 SC (55.94 q/ha) treated plots which are followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SC (54.19%), flubendiamide 39.35% SC (54.02 q/ha), cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (53.21 q/ha), neem oil 5% (52.36 q/ha) and NSKE 5% (51.27 q/ha).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC had cost benefit ratio 1:4.47.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45 SCe0
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:4.47e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The economics of various treatments based on net profit and cost of plant protection revealed that the highest cost: benefit ratio Spinosad 45 SC (1:4.47) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SC (1:3.96), followed by Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (1: 2.06), Neem oil 5% (1: 1.25), NSKE 5% (1: 1.23) and the lowest cost-benefit ratio was observed in Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (1: 0.88).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5% SC had cost benefit ratio 1:3.96.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5% SCe0
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:3.96e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The economics of various treatments based on net profit and cost of plant protection revealed that the highest cost: benefit ratio Spinosad 45 SC (1:4.47) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SC (1:3.96), followed by Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (1: 2.06), Neem oil 5% (1: 1.25), NSKE 5% (1: 1.23) and the lowest cost-benefit ratio was observed in Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (1: 0.88).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP had cost benefit ratio 1: 2.06.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Cartap hydrochloride 50% SPe0
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1: 2.06e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The economics of various treatments based on net profit and cost of plant protection revealed that the highest cost: benefit ratio Spinosad 45 SC (1:4.47) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SC (1:3.96), followed by Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (1: 2.06), Neem oil 5% (1: 1.25), NSKE 5% (1: 1.23) and the lowest cost-benefit ratio was observed in Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (1: 0.88).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil 5% had cost benefit ratio 1: 1.25.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Neem oil 5%e0
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1: 1.25e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The economics of various treatments based on net profit and cost of plant protection revealed that the highest cost: benefit ratio Spinosad 45 SC (1:4.47) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SC (1:3.96), followed by Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (1: 2.06), Neem oil 5% (1: 1.25), NSKE 5% (1: 1.23) and the lowest cost-benefit ratio was observed in Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (1: 0.88).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE 5% had cost benefit ratio 1: 1.23.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- NSKE 5%e0
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1: 1.23e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The economics of various treatments based on net profit and cost of plant protection revealed that the highest cost: benefit ratio Spinosad 45 SC (1:4.47) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SC (1:3.96), followed by Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (1: 2.06), Neem oil 5% (1: 1.25), NSKE 5% (1: 1.23) and the lowest cost-benefit ratio was observed in Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (1: 0.88).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 39.35% SC had cost benefit ratio 1: 0.88.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Flubendiamide 39.35% SCe0
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1: 0.88e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The economics of various treatments based on net profit and cost of plant protection revealed that the highest cost: benefit ratio Spinosad 45 SC (1:4.47) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SC (1:3.96), followed by Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP (1: 2.06), Neem oil 5% (1: 1.25), NSKE 5% (1: 1.23) and the lowest cost-benefit ratio was observed in Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (1: 0.88).”
t0“Rice Caseworm”
The same questions in other papers
flubendiamide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →emamectin benzoate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
spinosad · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →hydrochloride · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →cartap · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
204 papers more in this group
See all 208 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.