Abstract
Eight insecticide treatments, viz monocrotophos 36 SL, chlorpyriphos 20 EC, triazophos 40 EC, imidacloprid 200 SL, endosulfan 35 EC, quinalphos 25 EC, methyl parathion 50 EC and cartap hydrochloride 4 G were evaluated for their efficacy against rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee), yellow stem borer Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) and whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) under field conditions during kharif 2005 and 2006. Cartap hydrochloride 4 G @ 1.0 kg ai ha−1 followed by monocrotophos 36 SL @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1 ana chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1 proved most effective in reducing leaf folder infestation. At booting crop stage, in case of white ear infestation, chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1, cartap hydrochloride followed by triazophos 40 EC @ 0.35 kg ai ha−1 effectively reduced infestation. At booting stage, imidacloprid, endosullan, quinalphos and cartap hydrochloride significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population. The grain yield was high in cartap hydrochloride followed by monocrotophos and chlorpyriphos.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Cartap hydrochloride followed by monocrotophos was most effective in reducing rice leaf folder infestation.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- Cartap hydrochloride 4 G @ 1.0 kg ai ha−1 followed by monocrotophos 36 SL @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1e1
- Interactor
- Cnaphalocrocis medinalis
Cnaphalocrocis medinalise3pest - Outcome
- leaf folder infestatione2
- Direction
- reducinge2
- Comparator
- Eight insecticide treatmentse0
- Setting
- field conditionse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e0“Eight insecticide treatments”
e1“Cartap hydrochloride 4 G @ 1.0 kg ai ha−1 followed by monocrotophos 36 SL @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1”
e2“proved most effective in reducing leaf folder infestation”
e3“rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee)”
e4“under field conditions during kharif 2005 and 2006”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos was most effective in reducing rice leaf folder infestation.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1e5
- Interactor
- Cnaphalocrocis medinalisCnaphalocrocis medinalise3pest
- Outcome
- leaf folder infestatione5
- Direction
- reducinge5
- Comparator
- Eight insecticide treatmentse0
- Setting
- field conditionse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e0“Eight insecticide treatments”
e3“rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee)”
e4“under field conditions during kharif 2005 and 2006”
e5“ana chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1 proved most effective in reducing leaf folder infestation”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos reduced white ear infestation in rice at booting crop stage.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- booting crop stagee6
- Treatment
- chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1e6
- Outcome
- white ear infestatione6
- Direction
- reducede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e6“At booting crop stage, in case of white ear infestation, chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1, cartap hydrochloride followed by triazophos 40 EC @ 0.35 kg ai ha−1 effectively reduced infestation”
Claim · model-written summary
Cartap hydrochloride followed by triazophos reduced white ear infestation in rice at booting crop stage.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- booting crop stagee6
- Treatment
- cartap hydrochloride followed by triazophos 40 EC @ 0.35 kg ai ha−1e6
- Outcome
- white ear infestatione6
- Direction
- reducede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e6“At booting crop stage, in case of white ear infestation, chlorpyriphos 20 EC @ 0.50 kg ai ha−1, cartap hydrochloride followed by triazophos 40 EC @ 0.35 kg ai ha−1 effectively reduced infestation”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population in rice at booting stage.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- At booting stagee0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Interactor
- Sogatella furciferaSogatella furciferae7pest
- Outcome
- whitebacked planthopper populatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e7“whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)”
e0“At booting stage, imidacloprid, endosullan, quinalphos and cartap hydrochloride significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population”
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulfan significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population in rice at booting stage.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- At booting stagee0
- Treatment
- endosullane0
- Interactor
- Sogatella furciferaSogatella furciferae7pest
- Outcome
- whitebacked planthopper populatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e7“whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)”
e0“At booting stage, imidacloprid, endosullan, quinalphos and cartap hydrochloride significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population in rice at booting stage.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- At booting stagee0
- Treatment
- quinalphose0
- Interactor
- Sogatella furciferaSogatella furciferae7pest
- Outcome
- whitebacked planthopper populatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e7“whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)”
e0“At booting stage, imidacloprid, endosullan, quinalphos and cartap hydrochloride significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population”
Claim · model-written summary
Cartap hydrochloride significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population in rice at booting stage.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- At booting stagee0
- Treatment
- cartap hydrochloridee0
- Interactor
- Sogatella furciferaSogatella furciferae7pest
- Outcome
- whitebacked planthopper populatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e7“whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)”
e0“At booting stage, imidacloprid, endosullan, quinalphos and cartap hydrochloride significantly reduced whitebacked planthopper population”
Claim · model-written summary
Cartap hydrochloride followed by monocrotophos gave high grain yield in rice.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- cartap hydrochloride followed by monocrotophose0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e0“The grain yield was high in cartap hydrochloride followed by monocrotophos and chlorpyriphos”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos gave high grain yield in rice.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- chlorpyriphose0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Insect Pests of Rice”
e0“The grain yield was high in cartap hydrochloride followed by monocrotophos and chlorpyriphos”
The same questions in other papers
cartap · Sogatella furcifera · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
hydrochloride · Sogatella furcifera · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
hydrochloride · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →monocrotophos · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →cartap · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →cartap · Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
hydrochloride · Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
monocrotophos · Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.