Abstract
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of commonly used post-emergence herbicides under flooded rice fields, for Conyza spp. control. The greenhouse experiment employed a factorial setup with factor A denoting the presence or absence of a water layer post-application, and factor B representing different herbicides, to C. sumatrensis. In field trials, were applied when the rice plantation was on V3 stage. Evaluations were control (%), roots and shoot dry weight of Conyza spp., as well as injury (%), number of grains per panicle, and grain yield (ha−1) of rice. The applications of imazapyr + imazapic, florpyrauxifen-benzyl, imazethapyr, penoxsulam, quinclorac, bentazon, triclopyr-butyl, saflufenacil and ethoxysulfuron followed by water layer entry led to Conyza spp. control surpassing 80% at 28 DAA. The herbicides florpyrauxifen-benzyl, quinclorac, triclopyr-butyl, and saflufenacil, without flooding after application, demonstrated Sumatran fleabane control equal to or greater than 80% at 28 DAA. Effective water layer management is crucial for Conyza spp. control in zero-grade rice cultivation areas.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Nine herbicides followed by flooding controlled Conyza by over 80% at 28 DAA.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- imazapyr + imazapic, florpyrauxifen-benzyl, imazethapyr, penoxsulam, quinclorac, bentazon, triclopyr-butyl, saflufenacil and ethoxysulfuron followed by water layer entrye0
- Outcome
- Conyza spp. controle0
- Direction
- surpassinge0
- Value
- 80%e0
- Qualifier
- 28 DAAe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The applications of imazapyr + imazapic, florpyrauxifen-benzyl, imazethapyr, penoxsulam, quinclorac, bentazon, triclopyr-butyl, saflufenacil and ethoxysulfuron followed by water layer entry led to Conyza spp. control surpassing 80% at 28 DAA.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Four herbicides without flooding controlled Sumatran fleabane at least 80% at 28 DAA.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- florpyrauxifen-benzyl, quinclorac, triclopyr-butyl, and saflufenacil, without flooding after applicatione0
- Outcome
- Sumatran fleabane controle0
- Direction
- equal to or greater thane0
- Value
- 80%e0
- Qualifier
- 28 DAAe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The herbicides florpyrauxifen-benzyl, quinclorac, triclopyr-butyl, and saflufenacil, without flooding after application, demonstrated Sumatran fleabane control equal to or greater than 80% at 28 DAA.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend effective water layer management for Conyza control in zero-grade rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Outcome
- water layer managemente0
- Qualifier
- Conyza spp. control in zero-grade rice cultivation arease0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Effective water layer management is crucial for Conyza spp. control in zero-grade rice cultivation areas.”
t0“rice”
The same questions in other papers
saflufenacil · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
bentazone · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →quinclorac · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →florpyrauxifen-benzyl · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Penoxsulam · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Imazethapyr · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →imazapic · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
imazapyr · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.