Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Boron Concentration on Growth and Grain Quality of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Nafie Albayaty; Salah Hameed Jumaa

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The field experiment was carried out during the spring 2023 season at the Experimental Research Station of the Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tikrit. The station is situated at a latitude of approximately 34.616°N and a longitude of approximately 43.679°E east of the equator. Four varieties of maize (Zea mays L.) were sown in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in a factorial scheme with 3 replications. The main split plots included five levels: concentrations of spraying with nano-and mineral boron (spraying with only distilled water, spraying with mineral boron at a concentration of (1 and 2) ml -1 , and spraying with nano-boron at a concentration of 1 and 2ml -1 , whereas the secondary plots included four varieties of Zea mays L. (namely, Al-Maha, Baghdad, Al-Fajr, and 5018). To find out the effect of concentrations of boron on the growth and quality of grains for varieties of Zea mays L. The experiment proved the superiority of spraying with the mineral boron element 2 mlL -1 in the qualities of the number of days of planting to 50% male flowering (staminate flowering), and the number of days of planting to 50% female flowering (pistillate flowering), plant height and leaf area. Spraying with nano boron 2 mlL -1 has surpassed in the content of chlorophyll and all attributes of grain quality except the percentage of ash. It is noted from the evaluation of the performance of the varieties that Al-Fajir variety exceeded in both qualities the number of days of planting to 50% male flowering and the number of days of planting to 50% female flowering. However, 5018 variety exceeded and gave the highest averages in the following qualities: leaf area and oil percentage in grains, reaching (63.42cm 2 ) and (5.96%) respectively. Whereas, Baghdad variety exceeded in terms of height, chlorophyll content, protein percentage and starch percentage in grains and gave averages of 2.13 cm, 42.92 SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), (9.42%) and (33.85%) respectively. As for the interaction between the varieties and the proportions of boron spraying, the combination (spraying of mineral boron 2 mlL -1 and Baghdad variety) outperformed in the attributes of plant height, chlorophyll content and ash percentage, recording 2.35cm, 45.78 SPAD and (1.40%), respectively. Concerning leaf area, the mineral boron spray surpassed 2 ml -1 with 5018 and gave a value of 711.09cm 2 . These results enable maize growers to select and produce maize varieties with early male and female flowering with an increase in the attributes qualities of the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral boron at 2 mlL -1 was superior for male and female flowering timing.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
spraying with the mineral boron element 2 mlL -1e0
Outcome
number of days of planting to 50% male flowering (staminate flowering), and the number of days of planting to 50% female flowering (pistillate flowering)e0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment proved the superiority of spraying with the mineral boron element 2 mlL -1 in the qualities of the number of days of planting to 50% male flowering (staminate flowering), and the number of days of planting to 50% female flowering (pistillate flowering), plant height and leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral boron at 2 mlL -1 was superior for plant height and leaf area.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
spraying with the mineral boron element 2 mlL -1e0
Outcome
plant height and leaf areae0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment proved the superiority of spraying with the mineral boron element 2 mlL -1 in the qualities of the number of days of planting to 50% male flowering (staminate flowering), and the number of days of planting to 50% female flowering (pistillate flowering), plant height and leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano boron at 2 mlL -1 was superior for chlorophyll content and grain quality attributes except ash percentage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Spraying with nano boron 2 mlL -1e0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll and all attributes of grain qualitye0
Direction
surpassede0
Qualifier
except the percentage of ashe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying with nano boron 2 mlL -1 has surpassed in the content of chlorophyll and all attributes of grain quality except the percentage of ash.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al-Fajir was superior in timing of male and female flowering.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Al-Fajire0
Outcome
number of days of planting to 50% male flowering and the number of days of planting to 50% female floweringe0
Direction
exceedede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al-Fajir variety exceeded in both qualities the number of days of planting to 50% male flowering and the number of days of planting to 50% female flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety 5018 had the highest leaf area at 63.42cm 2.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
5018e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
63.42cm 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5018 variety exceeded and gave the highest averages in the following qualities: leaf area and oil percentage in grains, reaching (63.42cm 2 ) and (5.96%) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety 5018 had the highest grain oil percentage at 5.96%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
5018e0
Outcome
oil percentage in grainse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.96%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5018 variety exceeded and gave the highest averages in the following qualities: leaf area and oil percentage in grains, reaching (63.42cm 2 ) and (5.96%) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baghdad was superior for height at 2.13 cm.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Baghdade0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
2.13 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Baghdad variety exceeded in terms of height, chlorophyll content, protein percentage and starch percentage in grains and gave averages of 2.13 cm, 42.92 SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), (9.42%) and (33.85%) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baghdad was superior for chlorophyll content at 42.92 SPAD.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Baghdade0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
42.92 SPADe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Baghdad variety exceeded in terms of height, chlorophyll content, protein percentage and starch percentage in grains and gave averages of 2.13 cm, 42.92 SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), (9.42%) and (33.85%) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baghdad was superior for grain protein percentage at 9.42%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Baghdade0
Outcome
protein percentagee0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
9.42%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Baghdad variety exceeded in terms of height, chlorophyll content, protein percentage and starch percentage in grains and gave averages of 2.13 cm, 42.92 SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), (9.42%) and (33.85%) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baghdad was superior for grain starch percentage at 33.85%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Baghdade0
Outcome
starch percentage in grainse0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
33.85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Baghdad variety exceeded in terms of height, chlorophyll content, protein percentage and starch percentage in grains and gave averages of 2.13 cm, 42.92 SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), (9.42%) and (33.85%) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral boron 2 mlL -1 with Baghdad outperformed for plant height at 2.35cm.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Baghdade0
Treatment
spraying of mineral boron 2 mlL -1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
2.35cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination (spraying of mineral boron 2 mlL -1 and Baghdad variety) outperformed in the attributes of plant height, chlorophyll content and ash percentage, recording 2.35cm, 45.78 SPAD and (1.40%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral boron 2 mlL -1 with Baghdad outperformed for chlorophyll content at 45.78 SPAD.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Baghdade0
Treatment
spraying of mineral boron 2 mlL -1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
45.78 SPADe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination (spraying of mineral boron 2 mlL -1 and Baghdad variety) outperformed in the attributes of plant height, chlorophyll content and ash percentage, recording 2.35cm, 45.78 SPAD and (1.40%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral boron 2 mlL -1 with Baghdad outperformed for ash percentage at 1.40%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Baghdade0
Treatment
spraying of mineral boron 2 mlL -1e0
Outcome
ash percentagee0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
1.40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination (spraying of mineral boron 2 mlL -1 and Baghdad variety) outperformed in the attributes of plant height, chlorophyll content and ash percentage, recording 2.35cm, 45.78 SPAD and (1.40%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral boron with 5018 had superior leaf area at 711.09cm 2.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
5018e0
Treatment
mineral boron spraye0
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
surpassede0
Value
711.09cm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mineral boron spray surpassed 2 ml -1 with 5018 and gave a value of 711.09cm 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2362–2444 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area, the mineral boron spray surpassed 2 ml -1 with 5018 and gave a value of 711.09cm 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2351–2444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

boron atom · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

boron atom · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

boron atom · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 44 positive, 6 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 84 positive, 5 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.