Paper · 2024 · Sensors

Evaluating Bacterial Nanocellulose Interfaces for Recording Surface Biopotentials from Plants

James Reynolds; Michael Wilkins; Devon Martin; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study of plant electrophysiology offers promising techniques to track plant health and stress in vivo for both agricultural and environmental monitoring applications. Use of superficial electrodes on the plant body to record surface potentials may provide new phenotyping insights. Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) is a flexible, optically translucent, and water-vapor-permeable material with low manufacturing costs, making it an ideal substrate for non-invasive and non-destructive plant electrodes. This work presents BNC electrodes with screen-printed carbon (graphite) ink-based conductive traces and pads. It investigates the potential of these electrodes for plant surface electrophysiology measurements in comparison to commercially available standard wet gel and needle electrodes. The electrochemically active surface area and impedance of the BNC electrodes varied based on the annealing temperature and time over the ranges of 50 °C to 90 °C and 5 to 60 min, respectively. The water vapor transfer rate and optical transmittance of the BNC substrate were measured to estimate the level of occlusion caused by these surface electrodes on the plant tissue. The total reduction in chlorophyll content under the electrodes was measured after the electrodes were placed on maize leaves for up to 300 h, showing that the BNC caused only a 16% reduction. Maize leaf transpiration was reduced by only 20% under the BNC electrodes after 72 h compared to a 60% reduction under wet gel electrodes in 48 h. On three different model plants, BNC-carbon ink surface electrodes and standard invasive needle electrodes were shown to have a comparable signal quality, with a correlation coefficient of >0.9, when measuring surface biopotentials induced by acute environmental stressors. These are strong indications of the superior performance of the BNC substrate with screen-printed graphite ink as an electrode material for plant surface biopotential recordings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNC electrode active surface area varied with annealing temperature and time.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Outcome
electrochemically active surface areae0
Qualifier
50 °C to 90 °C and 5 to 60 mine0
Comparator
annealing temperature and timee0

Verbatim

e0

“The electrochemically active surface area and impedance of the BNC electrodes varied based on the annealing temperature and time over the ranges of 50 °C to 90 °C and 5 to 60 min, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluating Bacterial Nanocellulose Interfaces for Recording Surface Biopotentials from Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNC electrode impedance varied with annealing temperature and time.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Outcome
impedancee0
Qualifier
50 °C to 90 °C and 5 to 60 mine0
Comparator
annealing temperature and timee0

Verbatim

e0

“The electrochemically active surface area and impedance of the BNC electrodes varied based on the annealing temperature and time over the ranges of 50 °C to 90 °C and 5 to 60 min, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluating Bacterial Nanocellulose Interfaces for Recording Surface Biopotentials from Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNC electrodes reduced maize leaf chlorophyll content by only 16% after placement for up to 300 h.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
BNCe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
16%e0
Qualifier
up to 300 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total reduction in chlorophyll content under the electrodes was measured after the electrodes were placed on maize leaves for up to 300 h, showing that the BNC caused only a 16% reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNC electrodes reduced maize leaf transpiration by 20% after 72 h.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
BNC electrodese0
Outcome
leaf transpiratione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
after 72 he0
Comparator
wet gel electrodese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize leaf transpiration was reduced by only 20% under the BNC electrodes after 72 h compared to a 60% reduction under wet gel electrodes in 48 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet gel electrodes reduced maize leaf transpiration by 60% in 48 h.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
wet gel electrodese0
Outcome
leaf transpiratione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
60%e0
Qualifier
in 48 he0
Comparator
BNC electrodese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize leaf transpiration was reduced by only 20% under the BNC electrodes after 72 h compared to a 60% reduction under wet gel electrodes in 48 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1507 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNC-carbon ink surface and needle electrodes had comparable signal quality across three model plants, with correlation coefficient above 0.9.

Taxon
model plantse0
Outcome
signal qualitye0
Value
>0.9e0
Qualifier
acute environmental stressorse0
Comparator
standard invasive needle electrodese0

Verbatim

e0

“On three different model plants, BNC-carbon ink surface electrodes and standard invasive needle electrodes were shown to have a comparable signal quality, with a correlation coefficient of >0.9, when measuring surface biopotentials induced by acute environmental stressors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1781 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 44 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.