Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

Selenium and its nanoparticles modulate the metabolism of reactive oxygen species and morpho-physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to combat oxidative stress under water deficit conditions

Mirza Hasanuzzaman; Md. Rakib Hossain Raihan; Ayesha Siddika; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important cereal crop species worldwide, but its growth and development are adversely influenced by drought stress. However, the application of trace elements is known to improve plant physiology under water-limited conditions. In this study, the effects of drought stress on wheat plants were investigated, with a focus on potential mitigation by foliar application of selenium nanoparticles (Se(np)) and sodium selenate (Na 2 SeO 4 ). The experiment was conducted in a net house using a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments involved three levels of drought stress (mild, moderate, and severe) started at 30 days after sowing (DAS), with foliar sprays of Se(np) and Se (both 25 µM) initiated at 27 DAS and repeated 4 times at 7-day intervals until 55 DAS. Results Drought stress significantly reduced plant growth, whereas Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced it. Drought stress induced chlorophyll degradation, increased malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide levels, impaired membrane stability, and caused electrolyte leakage. Severe drought stress reduced the levels of antioxidants (e.g., proline, ascorbate, and glutathione by 4.18-fold, 80%, and 45%) and the activities of antioxidant enzymes (ascorbate peroxidase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and others). Conversely, treatment with Se(np) and Se restored these parameters, for example, 1.23-fold higher total chlorophyll content with Se(np) treatment, 26% higher APX activity with Se treatment, 15% lower electrolyte leakage with Se treatment in wheat plants under severe drought stress. This Se-associated enhancement facilitated rapid scavenging of reactive oxygen species and reduced methylglyoxal toxicity, thereby diminishing oxidative stress and positively affecting the morphophysiological and biochemical responses of the plants under drought. Conclusions Drought-stressed wheat plants exhibited reductions in physiological processes, including water uptake and photosynthetic activity. However, Se(np) and Se applied at 25 µM mitigated the detrimental effects of drought. The application of Se(np) was notably more effective than the application of Se in mitigating drought stress, indicating the potential of the application of Se(np) as a sustainable agricultural practice under water-limited conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced wheat plant growth.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant growth, whereas Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced wheat plant growth under drought.

Treatment
Se(np) and Se sprayse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant growth, whereas Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought reduced antioxidant levels (proline, ascorbate, glutathione) in wheat.

Treatment
Severe drought stresse0
Outcome
levels of antioxidantse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Severe drought stress reduced the levels of antioxidants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se(np) treatment gave 1.23-fold higher total chlorophyll in wheat under severe drought.

Treatment
Se(np) treatmente0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.23-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“1.23-fold higher total chlorophyll content with Se(np) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se treatment gave 26% higher APX activity in wheat under severe drought.

Treatment
Se treatmente0
Outcome
APX activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“26% higher APX activity with Se treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se treatment gave 15% lower electrolyte leakage in wheat under severe drought.

Treatment
Se treatmente0
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“15% lower electrolyte leakage with Se treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se(np) was more effective than Se in mitigating drought stress in wheat.

Treatment
Se(np)e0
Outcome
mitigating drought stresse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
See0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of Se(np) was notably more effective than the application of Se in mitigating drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2241 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

selenium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.