Abstract
Abstract Background Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important cereal crop species worldwide, but its growth and development are adversely influenced by drought stress. However, the application of trace elements is known to improve plant physiology under water-limited conditions. In this study, the effects of drought stress on wheat plants were investigated, with a focus on potential mitigation by foliar application of selenium nanoparticles (Se(np)) and sodium selenate (Na 2 SeO 4 ). The experiment was conducted in a net house using a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments involved three levels of drought stress (mild, moderate, and severe) started at 30 days after sowing (DAS), with foliar sprays of Se(np) and Se (both 25 µM) initiated at 27 DAS and repeated 4 times at 7-day intervals until 55 DAS. Results Drought stress significantly reduced plant growth, whereas Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced it. Drought stress induced chlorophyll degradation, increased malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide levels, impaired membrane stability, and caused electrolyte leakage. Severe drought stress reduced the levels of antioxidants (e.g., proline, ascorbate, and glutathione by 4.18-fold, 80%, and 45%) and the activities of antioxidant enzymes (ascorbate peroxidase, dehydroascorbate reductase, and others). Conversely, treatment with Se(np) and Se restored these parameters, for example, 1.23-fold higher total chlorophyll content with Se(np) treatment, 26% higher APX activity with Se treatment, 15% lower electrolyte leakage with Se treatment in wheat plants under severe drought stress. This Se-associated enhancement facilitated rapid scavenging of reactive oxygen species and reduced methylglyoxal toxicity, thereby diminishing oxidative stress and positively affecting the morphophysiological and biochemical responses of the plants under drought. Conclusions Drought-stressed wheat plants exhibited reductions in physiological processes, including water uptake and photosynthetic activity. However, Se(np) and Se applied at 25 µM mitigated the detrimental effects of drought. The application of Se(np) was notably more effective than the application of Se in mitigating drought stress, indicating the potential of the application of Se(np) as a sustainable agricultural practice under water-limited conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress significantly reduced wheat plant growth.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Drought stresse0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Drought stress significantly reduced plant growth, whereas Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced it”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced wheat plant growth under drought.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Se(np) and Se sprayse0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Drought stress significantly reduced plant growth, whereas Se(np) and Se sprays enhanced it”
Claim · model-written summary
Severe drought reduced antioxidant levels (proline, ascorbate, glutathione) in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Severe drought stresse0
- Outcome
- levels of antioxidantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Severe drought stress reduced the levels of antioxidants”
Claim · model-written summary
Se(np) treatment gave 1.23-fold higher total chlorophyll in wheat under severe drought.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Se(np) treatmente0
- Outcome
- total chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.23-folde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“1.23-fold higher total chlorophyll content with Se(np) treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Se treatment gave 26% higher APX activity in wheat under severe drought.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Se treatmente0
- Outcome
- APX activitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 26%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“26% higher APX activity with Se treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Se treatment gave 15% lower electrolyte leakage in wheat under severe drought.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Se treatmente0
- Outcome
- electrolyte leakagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 15%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“15% lower electrolyte leakage with Se treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Se(np) was more effective than Se in mitigating drought stress in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Se(np)e0
- Outcome
- mitigating drought stresse0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- See0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“The application of Se(np) was notably more effective than the application of Se in mitigating drought stress”
The same questions in other papers
selenium atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →selenium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →selenium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →selenium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
303 papers more in this group
See all 307 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.