Abstract
An experiment was conducted at Agronomy Research Farm of Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India during Kharif season 2022 and 2023 to find out the effect of planting geometry and inorganic fertilizers with nano urea on growth indices of rice crop. All the growth indices parameters viz. Crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1) Relative growth rate (g g-1 day-1x 10-3), Net Assimilation rate (g m-2 day-1) and yield were significantly higher with the treatment P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] at par with treatment combination P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F3 [75% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] and significantly higher than the other treatments. It can be concluded that treatment C1 (20 cm × 10 cm) with the application of F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1 (Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] proved better during both the year for all growth indices to achieve higher yield and remuneration of rice crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
P1 geometry with F2 fertilizer produced significantly higher crop growth rate than other treatments, and was at par with P1 plus F3.
- Taxon
- Rice Crop
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)]e0
- Outcome
- Crop growth ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at pare0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1) Relative growth rate (g g-1 day-1x 10-3), Net Assimilation rate (g m-2 day-1) and yield were significantly higher with the treatment P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] at par with treatment combination P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F3 [75% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] and significantly higher than the other treatments.”
t0“Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
P1 plus F2 produced significantly higher relative growth rate than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Rice CropOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)]e0
- Outcome
- Relative growth ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Relative growth rate (g g-1 day-1x 10-3), Net Assimilation rate (g m-2 day-1) and yield were significantly higher with the treatment P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] at par with treatment combination P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F3 [75% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] and significantly higher than the other treatments.”
t0“Rice Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
P1 plus F2 produced significantly higher net assimilation rate than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Rice CropOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)]e0
- Outcome
- Net Assimilation ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Net Assimilation rate (g m-2 day-1) and yield were significantly higher with the treatment P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] at par with treatment combination P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F3 [75% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] and significantly higher than the other treatments.”
t0“Rice Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
P1 plus F2 produced significantly higher yield than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Rice CropOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)]e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield were significantly higher with the treatment P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] at par with treatment combination P1 (20 cm × 10 cm) and F3 [75% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1(Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] and significantly higher than the other treatments.”
t0“Rice Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend C1 geometry with F2 fertilization for rice growth indices, yield and remuneration.
- Taxon
- rice cropOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- C1 (20 cm × 10 cm) with the application of F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1 (Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)]e0
- Outcome
- higher yield and remuneratione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment C1 (20 cm × 10 cm) with the application of F2 [100% RDF + foliar spray of nano urea @ 3000 ml ha-1 (Tillering and Panicle initiation stage)] proved better during both the year for all growth indices to achieve higher yield and remuneration of rice crop”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
145 papers more in this group
See all 149 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
198 papers more in this group
See all 202 papers →application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
273 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
309 papers more in this group
See all 313 papers →nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
687 papers more in this group
See all 691 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
755 papers more in this group
See all 759 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.