Paper · 2015 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Effects of foliar and soil application of sodium silicate on arsenic toxicity and accumulation in rice (Oryza sativaL.) seedlings grown in As-contaminated paddy soils

Chien-Hui Syu; Chia-Chen Huang; Pei-Yu Jiang; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Silicon (Si) and arsenite (iAsIII) share the same pathway of uptake and translocation in rice (Oryza sativa L.), and it has been reported that Si can decrease arsenic (As) uptake by rice in hydroponic culture. Due to the competitive sorption between Si and As for the soil minerals, different extents of effects on As toxicity and uptake by rice as influenced by soil Si application were found. In order to avoid the competitive sorption between Si and As for the soil minerals, foliar applications of Si might be a more efficient alternative to reduce As uptake by rice. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Si foliar and soil applications on the growth and As accumulation in rice seedlings. In this study, three application rates of Si (as sodium silicate) were applied to (1) the foliage and (2) the soil, of rice grown in two soils with different Si retention capacities and As contents. The results showed that there were no significant differences in Si concentrations in shoots among different Si foliar applications, and it had no significant effect on the growth and As accumulation in rice seedlings. In contrast, soil applications of Si caused a decrease in As accumulation in shoots grown in the tested soils, resulting from a high Si/As ratio in the soil pore water allowing enough Si to out-compete the As for uptake by roots. These results were further supported by the significant negative correlation found between Si and As in the shoots. However, a growth inhibition of rice plants was also observed due to As toxicity from the addition of excessive treatments of Si into As-contaminated soils. Therefore, the results of this study suggest that foliar applications of Si are not able to decrease As accumulation in rice seedlings, but that the application of moderate amounts of Si into As-contaminated soils could effectively reduce As uptake by rice seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon rates did not significantly change silicon concentrations in rice shoots.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Si foliar applicationse0
Outcome
Si concentrations in shootse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
different Si foliar applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in Si concentrations in shoots among different Si foliar applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon did not significantly affect rice seedling growth.

Taxon
rice seedlingsOryza sativae0
Treatment
Si foliar applicationse1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had no significant effect on the growth and As accumulation in rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si foliar applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon did not significantly affect arsenic accumulation in rice seedlings.

Taxon
rice seedlingsOryza sativae0
Treatment
Si foliar applicationse1
Outcome
As accumulatione0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had no significant effect on the growth and As accumulation in rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si foliar applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive soil silicon treatments inhibited rice growth because of arsenic toxicity.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae0
Treatment
excessive treatments of Si into As-contaminated soilse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
due to As toxicitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a growth inhibition of rice plants was also observed due to As toxicity from the addition of excessive treatments of Si into As-contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1643 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend moderate soil silicon application to reduce arsenic uptake by rice seedlings.

Taxon
rice seedlingsOryza sativae0
Treatment
application of moderate amounts of Si into As-contaminated soilse0
Outcome
reduce As uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of moderate amounts of Si into As-contaminated soils could effectively reduce As uptake by rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1911 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 157 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Adding silicon during reproduction increased straw dry weight by 243%.

    Effect of silicon on the growth of rice plant at different growth stages · 1989 · compared with solution devoid of silicon throughout the growth period

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

177 papers: 164 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 164 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 212 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 212 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

313 papers: 274 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 274 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

309 papers more in this group

See all 313 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.