Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of seed priming by nano-urea and nano-zinc on growth and yield of rat-tail radish (Raphanus sativus var. caudatus)

Preeti .; Narayan Singh; Vasudha Maurya; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nano-fertilizers have the potential to enhance crop productivity by enhancing nutrient use efficiency. The present investigation was conducted during the rabi season of 2022-2023 in the experimental farm of DAV University, Jalandhar, to determine the effect of seed priming by Nano-Urea and Nano-Zinc on growth, yield and quality attributes of rat-tail radish. The experiment was laid in a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications comprising twelve treatments viz., T1 (Control), T2 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose), T3 (Nano-Urea i.e., 100%), T4 (Nano-Urea i.e., 50%), T5 (Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%), T6 (Nano-Urea i.e., 100% + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%), T7 (Nano-Urea i.e., 50% + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%), T8 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%), T9 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose + Nano-Urea i.e., 100%), T10 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose +Nano-Urea i.e., 50%), T11 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose +Nano-Urea i.e., 100% + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%) and T12 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose + Nano-Urea i.e., 50% + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%). The results showed that the seed-priming application of Nano-Urea (50%) along with NPK minimised the days to 50% germination. It was also observed that NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) minimised the days to 50% flowering, and increased the number of leaves per plant, leaf length and leaf area. Further, the combination of both Nano-Urea (50%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) along with NPK recorded the highest plant height, number of branches per plant and leaf width. Among, the pod yield of rat-tail radish, the highest pod length and pod diameter were recorded with the combination of NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%). Whereas, the maximum number of pods per plant was recorded under the combination application of both Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) along with NPK. It was also observed that NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) recorded the highest pod yield per plant, pod yield per plot and pod yield per hectare. Among the quality attributes, the soluble protein content, carotenoid content, total phenolic content and chlorophyll content. The TSS was recorded maximum when NPK was applied with 100% Nano-Zinc. Ascorbic acid and total flavonoid content were recorded maximum when NPK was applied in combination with the seed-priming of 100% Nano-Urea and 100%Nano-Zinc. The analysis of yield suggested that the maximum gross income, net income and benefit-cost ratio from the treatment T11 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose + Nano-Urea i.e., 100% + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with 50% Nano-Urea minimized days to 50% germination.

Treatment
Nano-Urea (50%) along with NPKe0
Outcome
days to 50% germinatione0
Direction
minimisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-priming application of Nano-Urea (50%) along with NPK minimised the days to 50% germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with 100% Nano-Urea and Nano-Zinc minimized days to 50% flowering.

Treatment
NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%)e0
Outcome
days to 50% floweringe0
Direction
minimisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) minimised the days to 50% flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That combination increased leaf number, length and area.

Treatment
NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%)e0
Outcome
number of leaves per plant, leaf length and leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) minimised the days to 50% flowering, and increased the number of leaves per plant, leaf length and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with 50% Nano-Urea and 100% Nano-Zinc gave the highest plant height, branch number and leaf width.

Treatment
Nano-Urea and Nano-Zinct0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches per plant and leaf widthe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK recorded the highest plant height, number of branches per plant and leaf width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed priming by nano-urea and nano-zinc on growth and yield of rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with 100% Nano-Urea gave the highest pod length and diameter.

Treatment
NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%)e0
Outcome
pod length and pod diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest pod length and pod diameter were recorded with the combination of NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1693 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with 100% Nano-Urea and Nano-Zinc gave the maximum number of pods per plant.

Treatment
Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) along with NPKe0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of pods per plant was recorded under the combination application of both Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) along with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same 100% combination gave the highest pod yield per plant, plot and hectare.

Treatment
NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%)e0
Outcome
pod yield per plant, pod yield per plot and pod yield per hectaree0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK along with Nano-Urea (100%) and Nano-Zinc (100%) recorded the highest pod yield per plant, pod yield per plot and pod yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1876–2015 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with 100% Nano-Zinc maximized TSS.

Treatment
NPK was applied with 100% Nano-Zince0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TSS was recorded maximum when NPK was applied with 100% Nano-Zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2144–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with 100% Nano-Urea and Nano-Zinc maximized ascorbic acid and flavonoid content.

Treatment
NPK was applied in combination with the seed-priming of 100% Nano-Urea and 100%Nano-Zince0
Outcome
Ascorbic acid and total flavonoid contente0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid and total flavonoid content were recorded maximum when NPK was applied in combination with the seed-priming of 100% Nano-Urea and 100%Nano-Zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2215–2372 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 produced maximum gross and net income and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
T11 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose + Nano-Urea i.e., 100% + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%)e0
Outcome
gross income, net income and benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. caudatus
Raphanus sativus var. caudatus · Taxon · picture of the speciesSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross income, net income and benefit-cost ratio from the treatment T11 (NPK i.e., 100% recommended dose + Nano-Urea i.e., 100% + Nano-Zinc i.e., 100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2415–2573 · show in text ↑
t0

“rat-tail radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ

112 papers: 107 positive, 5 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.