Abstract
In two field experiments carried out in 2006–2008, with two radish cultivars Treto F1 and Wernar F1 the effect of differentiated nitrogen fertilization on yield and biological value of radish grown for autumn harvest was examined. Mineral N content in the soil before seeds sowing was raised up to the level of: 50, 100 and 150 mg N·dm-3 by using: ammonium nitrate 34% N – [NH4NO3], calcium nitrate 15.5% N – [Ca(NO3)2·H2O], ammonium sulphate 20.0% N – [(NH4)2SO4], and ENTEC 26% N – [NH4NO3+(NH4)2SO4 + 0.8% DNPP]. The highest marketable yield of radish Treto F1 cv. was achieved in the case of ammonium nitrate use. In the case of Wernar F1 cv. kind of fertilizer didn’t affect the yield. Irrespective of the kind of fertilizer, increment of nitrogen content in the soil from 50 to 100 mg N·dm-3 caused the significant enhancement of radish yield. The similar yielding was recorded at nitrogen concentration equal to 150 mg N·dm-3 and 100 mg N·dm-3. Increasing mineral nitrogen concentration in the soil resulted in increment of nitrates content in radish roots, however their amounts not exceed permissible level. Plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate and ENTEC 26 contained lower amount of nitrates in edible parts in comparison to those supplied with ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium nitrate gave the highest marketable yield for Treto F1 radish.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Material
- Treto F1e0
- Treatment
- ammonium nitratee0
- Outcome
- marketable yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest marketable yield of radish Treto F1 cv. was achieved in the case of ammonium nitrate use.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer type did not affect Wernar F1 radish yield.
- Taxon
- RADISH
Raphanus sativust0 - Material
- Wernar F1e0
- Treatment
- kind of fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- didn’t affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In the case of Wernar F1 cv. kind of fertilizer didn’t affect the yield.”
t0“RADISH”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising soil nitrogen from 50 to 100 mg N·dm-3 significantly increased radish yield.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Treatment
- nitrogen content in the soile0
- Outcome
- radish yielde0
- Direction
- enhancemente0
- Value
- 100 mg N·dm-3e0
- Comparator
- 50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“increment of nitrogen content in the soil from 50 to 100 mg N·dm-3 caused the significant enhancement of radish yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Radish yield was similar at 150 and 100 mg N·dm-3.
- Taxon
- RADISH
Raphanus sativust0 - Treatment
- nitrogen concentration equal to 150 mg N·dm-3e0
- Outcome
- yieldinge0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- 100 mg N·dm-3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The similar yielding was recorded at nitrogen concentration equal to 150 mg N·dm-3 and 100 mg N·dm-3.”
t0“RADISH”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher mineral soil nitrogen increased nitrate content in radish roots, below the permissible level.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Treatment
- Increasing mineral nitrogen concentration in the soile0
- Outcome
- nitrates content in radish rootse0
- Direction
- incremente0
- Qualifier
- not exceed permissible levele0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing mineral nitrogen concentration in the soil resulted in increment of nitrates content in radish roots, however their amounts not exceed permissible level.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulphate fertilization produced less nitrate in edible radish parts than ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.
- Taxon
- RADISH
Raphanus sativust0 - Treatment
- ammonium sulphatee0
- Outcome
- nitrates in edible partse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- ammonium nitrate and calcium nitratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate and ENTEC 26 contained lower amount of nitrates in edible parts in comparison to those supplied with ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.”
t0“RADISH”
Claim · model-written summary
ENTEC 26 fertilization produced less nitrate in edible radish parts than ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.
- Taxon
- RADISH
Raphanus sativust0 - Treatment
- ENTEC 26e0
- Outcome
- nitrates in edible partse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- ammonium nitrate and calcium nitratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate and ENTEC 26 contained lower amount of nitrates in edible parts in comparison to those supplied with ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.”
t0“RADISH”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
108 papers more in this group
See all 112 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.