Paper · 2023 · Journal Of Biotechnology And Crop Science

Effect of foliar application of nano-N fertilizer on nutrient dynamics, yield, nutrient content and quality of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Khule Yogesh Ramesh; Waghmare Mahesh Shivchandra; Chavan Anil Laxman; et al.

3
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm Oilseed Research Station, Latur (M.H) during rabi season 2021-22 with a view to study the “Effect of foliar application of nano-N fertilizer on growth yield, and quality of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”. The experiment was conducted in randomized block design with eight treatments and three replications. Results revealed that treatment T7-50 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K through soil + two foliar sprays of 0.4 per cent nano-Nat 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw, available NPK and quality parameters viz, oil content, protein content and test weight and grain yield and straw yield of linseed, which was significantly superior over all the treatments but was at par with treatment T8-25 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K + three spray of 0.4 per cent nano-N at 20, 40 and 60 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 gave the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw and available NPK in linseed.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
50 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K through soil + two foliar sprays of 0.4 per cent nano-Ne1
Outcome
nutrient uptake by seed and straw, available NPKe2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
at par with treatment T8-25 per cent N (RDN)e2
Comparator
all the treatmentse2
Setting
Lature0

Verbatim

t0

“quality of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–143 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm Oilseed Research Station, Latur (M.H) during rabi season 2021-22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“T7-50 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K through soil + two foliar sprays of 0.4 per cent nano-Nat 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw, available NPK and quality parameters viz, oil content, protein content and test weight and grain yield and straw yield of linseed, which was significantly superior over all the treatments but was at par with treatment T8-25 per cent N (RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 gave the highest oil content, protein content and test weight of linseed.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
50 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K through soil + two foliar sprays of 0.4 per cent nano-Ne1
Outcome
oil content, protein content and test weighte2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
at par with treatment T8-25 per cent N (RDN)e2
Comparator
all the treatmentse2
Setting
Lature0

Verbatim

t0

“quality of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–143 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm Oilseed Research Station, Latur (M.H) during rabi season 2021-22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“T7-50 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K through soil + two foliar sprays of 0.4 per cent nano-Nat 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw, available NPK and quality parameters viz, oil content, protein content and test weight and grain yield and straw yield of linseed, which was significantly superior over all the treatments but was at par with treatment T8-25 per cent N (RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 gave the highest grain yield and straw yield of linseed.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
50 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K through soil + two foliar sprays of 0.4 per cent nano-Ne1
Outcome
grain yield and straw yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
at par with treatment T8-25 per cent N (RDN)e2
Comparator
all the treatmentse2
Setting
Lature0

Verbatim

t0

“quality of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–143 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm Oilseed Research Station, Latur (M.H) during rabi season 2021-22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“T7-50 per cent N (RDN) and 100 per cent P and K through soil + two foliar sprays of 0.4 per cent nano-Nat 20 and 40 DAS recorded the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded the highest nutrient uptake by seed and straw, available NPK and quality parameters viz, oil content, protein content and test weight and grain yield and straw yield of linseed, which was significantly superior over all the treatments but was at par with treatment T8-25 per cent N (RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–812 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: oil · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · quality: oil · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.