Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Experimental study on the effect of weather factors, micronutrients, growth regulators, and polyamines on mango (Mangifera indica L.) yield and quality Cv. Kesar

Anshul S Lohakare; Gajendra P Jagtap; Shama C Pathan

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mango trees were sprayed with chemicals such as putrescine (0.1 mM), spermine (0.01 mM), triacontanol (750 ppm), NAA (25 ppm), CPPU (3 ppm), salicylic acid (100 ppm), ZnSO4 (0.5%), and boron (0.5%) to investigate their effect on yield and quality. Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1), longest fruit length (11.05 cm), largest fruit diameter (7.35 cm), weight (239.36 g), firmest (14.67 kg/cm2), pulp weight (164.71 g), lowest acidity (0.24%), while maximum fruit volume (223.38 ml) recorded in treatment T14 (CPPU 3 ppm + SA 100 ppm + B 0.5%). The lowest yield and quality was noticed in treatment T19 (control). The correlation of weather parameters viz., maximum temperature range (28 °C to 43.9 °C) of both seasons showed significant correlation while, minimum temperature range (9.5 to 26.1 °C) exhibited deleterious effect on yield and quality traits. The influence of average maximum RH (35 to 81%) of both seasons showed negative but significant correlation. However, positive and significant correlation was found between maximum humidity and acidity content. The average minimum RH (8 to 43%) exhibited significant effects on mango cv. Kesar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 produced the highest mango yield of 27.68 MT ha-1.

Treatment
NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27.68 MT ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–343 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 produced the longest fruit length, 11.05 cm.

Treatment
NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%e0
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
longeste0
Value
11.05 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1), longest fruit length (11.05 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 produced the largest fruit diameter, 7.35 cm.

Treatment
NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%e0
Outcome
fruit diametere0
Direction
largeste0
Value
7.35 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1), longest fruit length (11.05 cm), largest fruit diameter (7.35 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 fruit weight was 239.36 g.

Treatment
NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%e0
Outcome
weighte0
Value
239.36 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1), longest fruit length (11.05 cm), largest fruit diameter (7.35 cm), weight (239.36 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 produced the firmest fruit, 14.67 kg/cm2.

Treatment
NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%e0
Outcome
firmeste0
Direction
firmeste0
Value
14.67 kg/cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1), longest fruit length (11.05 cm), largest fruit diameter (7.35 cm), weight (239.36 g), firmest (14.67 kg/cm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 pulp weight was 164.71 g.

Treatment
NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%e0
Outcome
pulp weighte0
Value
164.71 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1), longest fruit length (11.05 cm), largest fruit diameter (7.35 cm), weight (239.36 g), firmest (14.67 kg/cm2), pulp weight (164.71 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 produced the lowest acidity, 0.24%.

Treatment
NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%e0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T7 (NAA 25 ppm + SA 100 ppm + ZnSO4 0.5%) had the highest fruit yield (27.68 MT ha-1), longest fruit length (11.05 cm), largest fruit diameter (7.35 cm), weight (239.36 g), firmest (14.67 kg/cm2), pulp weight (164.71 g), lowest acidity (0.24%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T14 produced maximum fruit volume of 223.38 ml.

Treatment
CPPU 3 ppm + SA 100 ppm + B 0.5%e0
Outcome
fruit volumee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
223.38 mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fruit volume (223.38 ml) recorded in treatment T14 (CPPU 3 ppm + SA 100 ppm + B 0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the lowest yield and quality.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest yield and quality was noticed in treatment T19 (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum temperature was significantly correlated with yield and quality traits.

Treatment
maximum temperature rangee0
Outcome
yield and quality traitse0
Qualifier
28 °C to 43.9 °Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum temperature range (28 °C to 43.9 °C) of both seasons showed significant correlation while, minimum temperature range (9.5 to 26.1 °C) exhibited deleterious effect on yield and quality traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum temperature had a deleterious effect on yield and quality.

Treatment
minimum temperature rangee0
Outcome
yield and quality traitse0
Direction
deleteriouse0
Qualifier
9.5 to 26.1 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum temperature range (9.5 to 26.1 °C) exhibited deleterious effect on yield and quality traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average maximum relative humidity was negatively and significantly correlated with yield and quality.

Treatment
average maximum RHe0
Outcome
correlatione0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
35 to 81%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The influence of average maximum RH (35 to 81%) of both seasons showed negative but significant correlation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum humidity had a positive significant correlation with acidity content.

Treatment
maximum humiditye0
Outcome
acidity contente0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive and significant correlation was found between maximum humidity and acidity content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average minimum relative humidity had significant effects on Kesar mango.

Material
Kesare0
Treatment
average minimum RHe0
Outcome
significant effectse0
Qualifier
8 to 43%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average minimum RH (8 to 43%) exhibited significant effects on mango cv. Kesar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1211 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.