Paper · 2012 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Defence-related biochemical changes by elicitor of malformation pathogen,Fusarium mangiferae, in mango

Satguru Prasad Yadav; Gireesh Chand; Dilip Kumar Chakrabarti

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Malformation of mango (Mangifera indica L.) induced by Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans is a plant disease of international importance. The paper reports the downstream defence responses at the initial stage in a susceptible host (cultivar Amrapali) after treatment with biotic (isolated from the pathogen cell wall) (BEL) and abiotic (salicylic acid, SA) elicitors, and inoculation of vegetative buds with the pathogen (IVB). The SA was further tested to induce resistance in field trials. The inoculation and application of elicitors increased β-1, 3 glucanase that causes lysis of fungal hyphae by many folds. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (active oxygen species) that induces hypersensitive cell death was reduced to the minimum level after treatment with BEL. The reduction of H2O2 in the inoculated vegetative buds was also substantial; however, comparatively less with SA treatment. Consequently, there was no hypersensitive cell death in the malformed mango. Salicylic acid that enhances H2O2 content by suppressing H2O2-degradation by catalase, increased marginally with the SA treatment and in the IVB, but reduced with the BEL. The reduction of SA in BEL-treated buds concomitantly reduced its H2O2 content. The activity of catalase, suppressor of resistance mechanism, was reduced in all the treatments, but the reduction was not enough to arrest H2O2-degradation. Magiferin (1, 3, 6, 7-tetrahdroxyxanthone C2-β-D glucoside), a defence metabolite of mango, increased substantially in all the treatments; maximum with the BEL. A pathogenesis-related (PR) protein of 20 KDa that resists symptom development appeared in all the treatments except the control. But light colour of the spots for the PR-protein indicated low protein accumulation. The maximum accumulation was with the IVB followed by SA and BEL treatments. The amount of total protein reduced considerably in all the treatments. The SA treatment on healthy plants failed to induce defence against malformation. Contrarily, the treatment on malformed seedlings restored normal growth within two months. Hence, SA acted better over the infected plants in presence of the pathogen. Thus, a signal transduction system involving SA and H2O2 remained nonfunctional and enough defence chemicals could not be synthesised. Defence genes that produce phenolic and β-1, 3 glucanase, however, became activated and saved the plants from death although could not prevent symptom manifestations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation and elicitors increased β-1, 3 glucanase.

Treatment
inoculation and application of elicitorse0
Interactor
Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinansFusarium subglutinanse1pathogen
Outcome
β-1, 3 glucanasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium subglutinans
Fusarium subglutinans · InteractorTerry Price, Georgia Forestry Commission, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation and application of elicitors increased β-1, 3 glucanase that causes lysis of fungal hyphae by many folds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–618 · show in text ↑
e1

“Malformation of mango (Mangifera indica L.) induced by Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BEL lowered hydrogen peroxide to a minimum.

Treatment
BELe0
Outcome
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (active oxygen species) that induces hypersensitive cell death was reduced to the minimum level after treatment with BEL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen-inoculated buds substantially reduced hydrogen peroxide.

Organ / stage
vegetative budse0
Treatment
inoculated vegetative budse0
Outcome
H2O2e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of H2O2 in the inoculated vegetative buds was also substantial; however, comparatively less with SA treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA treatment reduced hydrogen peroxide less than pathogen inoculation.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
H2O2e0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
inoculated vegetative budse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of H2O2 in the inoculated vegetative buds was also substantial; however, comparatively less with SA treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malformed mango had no hypersensitive cell death.

Outcome
no hypersensitive cell deathe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, there was no hypersensitive cell death in the malformed mango.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid increased marginally with SA treatment.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
Salicylic acide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salicylic acid that enhances H2O2 content by suppressing H2O2-degradation by catalase, increased marginally with the SA treatment and in the IVB, but reduced with the BEL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid increased marginally in inoculated buds.

Treatment
IVBe0
Interactor
the pathogene2pathogen
Outcome
Salicylic acide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salicylic acid that enhances H2O2 content by suppressing H2O2-degradation by catalase, increased marginally with the SA treatment and in the IVB, but reduced with the BEL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation of vegetative buds with the pathogen (IVB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BEL reduced salicylic acid.

Treatment
BELe0
Outcome
Salicylic acide0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salicylic acid that enhances H2O2 content by suppressing H2O2-degradation by catalase, increased marginally with the SA treatment and in the IVB, but reduced with the BEL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced salicylic acid in BEL-treated buds coincided with lower hydrogen peroxide.

Organ / stage
budse0
Treatment
BEL-treatede0
Compound
SAe0
Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of SA in BEL-treated buds concomitantly reduced its H2O2 content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity declined in all treatments but insufficiently to stop hydrogen peroxide degradation.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
activity of catalasee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
not enough to arrest H2O2-degradatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of catalase, suppressor of resistance mechanism, was reduced in all the treatments, but the reduction was not enough to arrest H2O2-degradation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magiferin increased in all treatments, most under BEL.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
Magiferine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
maximum with the BELe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magiferin (1, 3, 6, 7-tetrahdroxyxanthone C2-β-D glucoside), a defence metabolite of mango, increased substantially in all the treatments; maximum with the BEL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20 KDa PR protein appeared under every treatment except control.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
pathogenesis-related (PR) proteine0
Value
20 KDae0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pathogenesis-related (PR) protein of 20 KDa that resists symptom development appeared in all the treatments except the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR protein accumulation was low based on spot colour.

Gene
PR-proteine0
Outcome
protein accumulatione0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“But light colour of the spots for the PR-protein indicated low protein accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1753 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR protein accumulation ranked highest in inoculated buds, followed by SA then BEL.

Gene
PR-proteine1
Outcome
accumulatione0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
IVB followed by SA and BEL treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum accumulation was with the IVB followed by SA and BEL treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1830 · show in text ↑
e1

“spots for the PR-protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1717 · show in text ↑
e2

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total protein declined considerably in all treatments.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
amount of total proteine0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of total protein reduced considerably in all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1902 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA did not induce malformation defence in healthy plants.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
defence against malformatione0
Direction
failed to inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SA treatment on healthy plants failed to induce defence against malformation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1984 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA restored normal growth in malformed seedlings within two months.

Organ / stage
malformed seedlingse0
Treatment
SA treatmente1
Outcome
normal growthe0
Direction
restorede0
Qualifier
within two monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contrarily, the treatment on malformed seedlings restored normal growth within two months.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1985–2075 · show in text ↑
e1

“The SA treatment on healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1937 · show in text ↑
e2

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that SA and H2O2 signalling was nonfunctional and defence chemical synthesis inadequate.

Compound
SA and H2O2e0
Outcome
enough defence chemicals could not be synthesisede0
Qualifier
signal transduction systeme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, a signal transduction system involving SA and H2O2 remained nonfunctional and enough defence chemicals could not be synthesised.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2287 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defence gene activation saved mango plants from death but did not prevent symptoms.

Gene
Defence genese0
Outcome
saved the plants from death although could not prevent symptom manifestationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Defence genes that produce phenolic and β-1, 3 glucanase, however, became activated and saved the plants from death although could not prevent symptom manifestations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2288–2454 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–43 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: hormones · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium subglutinans · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.