Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Response of Foliar Feeding of NAA, Urea, Nano-urea and Biofertisol on Fruit Quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra

Raushan Kumar; Rajnee Sharma; T. R. Sharma; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted during the season of 2022-23 at the fruit research station in Imalia, which is affiliated with the Department of Horticulture at the JNKVV in Jabalpur. The objective of the study was to evaluate the positive effect of foliar sprays containing NAA, Urea, Nano-urea, and Biofertisol on the fruit quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block design in three replications and all the treatments were replicated thrice by using the single tree as a unit. Each treatment was carried out with one tree for each replication. At the full bloom and pea stage, the spraying of three different concentrations of NAA (20 ppm, 30 ppm, and 40 ppm), Urea (2%, 3%, and 4%), Nano-urea (0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4%) and Biofertisol (5 ml/l, 10 ml/l, and 15 ml/l) was compared with the control, which consisted of no spraying. According to the findings of the experiment, applying a foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAA resulted in a significant improvement in the quality parameter, as measured by a maximum TSS value of 22.22 oBrix, a maximum TSS: acid ratio of 117.13, maximum ascorbic acid content of 26.70 mg/100g, a minimum acidity content of 0.19%, and reducing sugars of 6.74% and total sugars of 17. During the evaluation, it performed at the same level as T3 (NAA 30 ppm), T2 (NAA 20 ppm), and T7 (Urea 4%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm gave maximum TSS of 22.22 oBrix.

Material
Langrat0
Treatment
foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAAe0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
22.22 oBrixe0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying a foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAA resulted in a significant improvement in the quality parameter, as measured by a maximum TSS value of 22.22 oBrix, a maximum TSS: acid ratio of 117.13, maximum ascorbic acid content of 26.70 mg/100g, a minimum acidity content of 0.19%, and reducing sugars of 6.74% and total sugars of 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control, which consisted of no spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm gave maximum TSS to acid ratio of 117.13.

Treatment
foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAAe0
Outcome
TSS: acid ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
117.13e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying a foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAA resulted in a significant improvement in the quality parameter, as measured by a maximum TSS value of 22.22 oBrix, a maximum TSS: acid ratio of 117.13, maximum ascorbic acid content of 26.70 mg/100g, a minimum acidity content of 0.19%, and reducing sugars of 6.74% and total sugars of 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control, which consisted of no spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm gave maximum ascorbic acid of 26.70 mg/100g.

Treatment
foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAAe0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
26.70 mg/100ge0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying a foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAA resulted in a significant improvement in the quality parameter, as measured by a maximum TSS value of 22.22 oBrix, a maximum TSS: acid ratio of 117.13, maximum ascorbic acid content of 26.70 mg/100g, a minimum acidity content of 0.19%, and reducing sugars of 6.74% and total sugars of 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control, which consisted of no spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm gave minimum acidity of 0.19%.

Treatment
foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAAe0
Outcome
acidity contente0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.19%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying a foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAA resulted in a significant improvement in the quality parameter, as measured by a maximum TSS value of 22.22 oBrix, a maximum TSS: acid ratio of 117.13, maximum ascorbic acid content of 26.70 mg/100g, a minimum acidity content of 0.19%, and reducing sugars of 6.74% and total sugars of 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control, which consisted of no spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm gave reducing sugars of 6.74%.

Treatment
foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAAe0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Value
6.74%e0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying a foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAA resulted in a significant improvement in the quality parameter, as measured by a maximum TSS value of 22.22 oBrix, a maximum TSS: acid ratio of 117.13, maximum ascorbic acid content of 26.70 mg/100g, a minimum acidity content of 0.19%, and reducing sugars of 6.74% and total sugars of 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control, which consisted of no spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm gave total sugars of 17, with the unit absent from the abstract.

Treatment
foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAAe0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Value
17e0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying a foliar spray containing 40 ppm of NAA resulted in a significant improvement in the quality parameter, as measured by a maximum TSS value of 22.22 oBrix, a maximum TSS: acid ratio of 117.13, maximum ascorbic acid content of 26.70 mg/100g, a minimum acidity content of 0.19%, and reducing sugars of 6.74% and total sugars of 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control, which consisted of no spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 ppm NAA treatment performed at the same level as NAA 30 ppm for fruit quality.

Treatment
NAA 30 ppme0
Outcome
same levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the evaluation, it performed at the same level as T3 (NAA 30 ppm), T2 (NAA 20 ppm), and T7 (Urea 4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruit Quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 ppm NAA treatment performed at the same level as NAA 20 ppm for fruit quality.

Treatment
NAA 20 ppme0
Outcome
same levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the evaluation, it performed at the same level as T3 (NAA 30 ppm), T2 (NAA 20 ppm), and T7 (Urea 4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruit Quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 ppm NAA treatment performed at the same level as Urea 4% for fruit quality.

Treatment
Urea 4%e0
Outcome
same levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the evaluation, it performed at the same level as T3 (NAA 30 ppm), T2 (NAA 20 ppm), and T7 (Urea 4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruit Quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–125 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.