Abstract
Abstract Weeds result in a significant yield loss in mungbean ( Vigna radiata [L.] R. Wilczek). However, post‐emergence (POST) herbicides are limited in mungbean for broad‐spectrum weed control. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacies of different herbicides in mungbean to find a suitable broad‐spectrum POST herbicide. Nine herbicides, weed‐free check, and unweeded control treatments were tested in a randomised block design with three replications for two consecutive years. Among the tested herbicides, clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen 122.5 g a.i. ha −1 applied at 15 days after sowing (DAS) reduced the broad‐leaved weed dry weight at 35 DAS and harvest by 55.8% and by 58.6% ( p < 0.05) compared with the unweeded control respectively. Notably, it minimised the total weed dry weight by 23.1%–30.3% compared with the recommended herbicide pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha −1 – quizalopfop‐p‐ethyl 100 g a.i. ha −1 ( p ≤ 0.05). Clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen had higher weed control index (58.2% at 35 DAS and 62.1% at harvest) over the remaining tested herbicides. Unweeded controls resulted in 51% yield loss compared with the clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen that did not differ from pendimethalin − quizalofop‐p‐ethyl for seed yield of mungbean. Decreasing order of treatment efficacy on mean grain yield across two years comprised the weed‐free check, clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen and pendimethalin − quiza‐lofop‐p‐ethyl, imazethapyr + imazamox, tembotrione, and topramezone. [Correction added on 10 November 2022, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, changes have been made to the article content to improve clarity in this version.] Application of clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen led to the greatest increase in soil microbial biomass carbon, indicating higher levels of soil biological and rhizospheric activity. We suggest that clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium acifluorfen is a suitable broad‐spectrum option for weed management of mungbean.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop plus sodium-acifluorfen reduced broad-leaved weed dry weight at 35 days by 55.8%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen 122.5 g a.i. ha −1e0
- Interactor
- broad‐leaved weede0weed
- Outcome
- broad‐leaved weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 55.8%e0
- Comparator
- unweeded controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen 122.5 g a.i. ha −1 applied at 15 days after sowing (DAS) reduced the broad‐leaved weed dry weight at 35 DAS and harvest by 55.8% and by 58.6% ( p < 0.05) compared with the unweeded control respectively.”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment reduced broad-leaved weed dry weight at harvest by 58.6%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen 122.5 g a.i. ha −1e0
- Interactor
- broad‐leaved weede0weed
- Outcome
- broad‐leaved weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 58.6%e0
- Comparator
- unweeded controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen 122.5 g a.i. ha −1 applied at 15 days after sowing (DAS) reduced the broad‐leaved weed dry weight at 35 DAS and harvest by 55.8% and by 58.6% ( p < 0.05) compared with the unweeded control respectively.”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination reduced total weed dry weight by 23.1%–30.3% versus recommended herbicide.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfene2
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- total weed dry weighte0
- Direction
- minimisede0
- Value
- 23.1%–30.3%e0
- Comparator
- pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha −1 – quizalopfop‐p‐ethyl 100 g a.i. ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“it minimised the total weed dry weight by 23.1%–30.3% compared with the recommended herbicide pendimethalin 1 kg a.i. ha −1 – quizalopfop‐p‐ethyl 100 g a.i. ha −1 ( p ≤ 0.05).”
e2“clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen 122.5 g a.i. ha −1 applied at 15 days after sowing (DAS) reduced the broad‐leaved weed dry weight at 35 DAS and harvest by 55.8% and by 58.6% ( p < 0.05) compared with the unweeded control respectively.”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
e1“Weeds result in a significant yield loss in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment had the highest weed control index at 35 days, 58.2%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfene0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 58.2%e0
- Comparator
- remaining tested herbicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen had higher weed control index (58.2% at 35 DAS and 62.1% at harvest) over the remaining tested herbicides.”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment had the highest weed control index at harvest, 62.1%.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfene0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 62.1%e0
- Comparator
- remaining tested herbicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen had higher weed control index (58.2% at 35 DAS and 62.1% at harvest) over the remaining tested herbicides.”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Unweeded control lost 51% yield relative to the combination treatment.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Unweeded controlse0
- Interactor
- Weedse1weed
- Outcome
- yield losse0
- Direction
- losse0
- Value
- 51%e0
- Comparator
- clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfene0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Unweeded controls resulted in 51% yield loss compared with the clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
e1“Weeds result in a significant yield loss in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield under the combination did not differ from the recommended herbicide sequence.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfene0
- Interactor
- Weedse1weed
- Outcome
- seed yield of mungbeane0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- pendimethalin − quizalofop‐p‐ethyle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen that did not differ from pendimethalin − quizalofop‐p‐ethyl for seed yield of mungbean.”
e1“Weeds result in a significant yield loss in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield ranked weed-free check, two herbicide combinations, imazethapyr plus imazamox, tembotrione and topramezone.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Outcome
- Decreasing order of treatment efficacy on mean grain yielde0
- Direction
- Decreasinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Decreasing order of treatment efficacy on mean grain yield across two years comprised the weed‐free check, clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen and pendimethalin − quiza‐lofop‐p‐ethyl, imazethapyr + imazamox, tembotrione, and topramezone.”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop plus sodium-acifluorfen produced the largest soil microbial biomass carbon increase.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfene0
- Outcome
- soil microbial biomass carbone0
- Direction
- greatest increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Application of clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium‐acifluorfen led to the greatest increase in soil microbial biomass carbon”
t0“Bio‐efficacy of different post‐emergence herbicides in mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend the combination as broad-spectrum weed management for mungbean.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatae0 - Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium acifluorfen is a suitable broad‐spectrum option for weed managemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“We suggest that clodinafop‐propargyl + sodium acifluorfen is a suitable broad‐spectrum option for weed management of mungbean.”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.