Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of the best management practices on performance of dual-purpose baby corn (Zea mays) under eastern Himalayas

RAKESH KUMAR; BIDYUT C. DEKA; A. THIRUGNANAVEL; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) season of 2013–15 at the ICAR–Research Complex for North-Eastern Hill Region, Nagaland Centre, Jharnapani, Medziphema, Nagaland, to evaluate the effect of mulching, liming and integrated nutrition for maximizing the productivity of recently introduced crop baby corn (Zea mays L.) in the region. The results revealed that, use of straw mulches significantly increased the yield attributes of baby corn. Significantly higher yields of green baby cob (10.8 t/ha), baby corn (1.84 t/ha) and green fodders (34.65 t/ha) were recorded with application of 1.0 t lime/ha but was on a par with 0.5 t lime/ha. Similarly, higher yields of green baby cob (10.56 t/ha), baby corn (2.02 t/ha) and green fodder (34.95 t/ha) were noted with application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer through inorganic sources (RDF (IN) + 25% RDF through organic sources (ON). Hence, use of straw mulch integrated with application of lime in furrow @ 1.0 t/ha along with 100% RDF (IN: N-P-K-S-Zn: represents 150-80-60-30-10 kg/ha) + 25% RDF (ON) may be adopted and promoted to achieve the maximum crop productivity of baby corn under the foot-hill condition of eastern Himalayas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch significantly increased baby corn yield attributes.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
straw mulchese0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“use of straw mulches significantly increased the yield attributes of baby corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 1.0 t/ha produced 10.8 t/ha green baby cob yield, on par with 0.5 t/ha.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
1.0 t lime/hae0
Outcome
green baby cobe0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.8 t/hae0
Comparator
0.5 t lime/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yields of green baby cob (10.8 t/ha), baby corn (1.84 t/ha) and green fodders (34.65 t/ha) were recorded with application of 1.0 t lime/ha but was on a par with 0.5 t lime/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 1.0 t/ha produced 1.84 t/ha baby corn yield, on par with 0.5 t/ha.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
1.0 t lime/hae0
Outcome
baby corne0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.84 t/hae0
Comparator
0.5 t lime/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yields of green baby cob (10.8 t/ha), baby corn (1.84 t/ha) and green fodders (34.65 t/ha) were recorded with application of 1.0 t lime/ha but was on a par with 0.5 t lime/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 1.0 t/ha produced 34.65 t/ha green fodder yield, on par with 0.5 t/ha.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
1.0 t lime/hae0
Outcome
green fodderse0
Direction
highere0
Value
34.65 t/hae0
Comparator
0.5 t lime/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yields of green baby cob (10.8 t/ha), baby corn (1.84 t/ha) and green fodders (34.65 t/ha) were recorded with application of 1.0 t lime/ha but was on a par with 0.5 t lime/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic and organic fertilizer gave 10.56 t/ha green cob yield.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizer through inorganic sources (RDF (IN) + 25% RDF through organic sources (ON)e0
Outcome
green baby cobe0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.56 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher yields of green baby cob (10.56 t/ha), baby corn (2.02 t/ha) and green fodder (34.95 t/ha) were noted with application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer through inorganic sources (RDF (IN) + 25% RDF through organic sources (ON).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic and organic fertilizer gave 2.02 t/ha baby corn yield.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizer through inorganic sources (RDF (IN) + 25% RDF through organic sources (ON)e0
Outcome
baby corne0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.02 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher yields of green baby cob (10.56 t/ha), baby corn (2.02 t/ha) and green fodder (34.95 t/ha) were noted with application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer through inorganic sources (RDF (IN) + 25% RDF through organic sources (ON).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic and organic fertilizer gave 34.95 t/ha green fodder yield.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizer through inorganic sources (RDF (IN) + 25% RDF through organic sources (ON)e0
Outcome
green foddere0
Direction
highere0
Value
34.95 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher yields of green baby cob (10.56 t/ha), baby corn (2.02 t/ha) and green fodder (34.95 t/ha) were noted with application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer through inorganic sources (RDF (IN) + 25% RDF through organic sources (ON).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–909 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend straw mulch, furrow lime and combined inorganic and organic fertilizer for maximum baby corn productivity.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
straw mulch integrated with application of lime in furrow @ 1.0 t/ha along with 100% RDF (IN: N-P-K-S-Zn: represents 150-80-60-30-10 kg/ha) + 25% RDF (ON)e0
Outcome
maximum crop productivitye0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
eastern Himalayase0

Verbatim

e0

“use of straw mulch integrated with application of lime in furrow @ 1.0 t/ha along with 100% RDF (IN: N-P-K-S-Zn: represents 150-80-60-30-10 kg/ha) + 25% RDF (ON) may be adopted and promoted to achieve the maximum crop productivity of baby corn under the foot-hill condition of eastern Himalayas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1212 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

lime · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.