Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Effect of Mowing on Wheat Growth at Seeding Stage

Song Li; Shaoyu Wang; Wenjie Ye; et al.

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
10
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Winter wheat is used as forage at the tillering stage in many countries; however, the regrowth pattern of wheat after mowing remains unclear. In this study, the growth patterns of wheat were revealed through cytological and physiological assessments as well as transcriptome sequencing. The results of agronomic traits and paraffin sections showed that the shoot growth rate increased, but root growth was inhibited after mowing. The submicroscopic structure revealed a decrease in heterochromatin in the tillering node cell and a change in mitochondrial shape in the tillering node and secondary root. Analysis of the transcriptome showed the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions; 2492 upregulated DEGs and 1534 downregulated DEGs were identified. The results of the experimental study showed that mowing induced expression of DEGs in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway and increased the activity of PAL and 4CL. The upregulated DEGs in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathways and related enzyme activity alterations indicated that the sugar degradation rate increased. The DEGs in the nitrogen metabolism pathway biosynthesis of the amino acids, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis metabolism, and in the TCA pathway also changed after mowing. Hormone content and related gene expression was also altered in the tillering and secondary roots after mowing. When jasmonic acid and ethylene were used to treat the wheat after mowing, the regeneration rate increased, whereas abscisic acid inhibited regrowth. This study revealed the wheat growth patterns after mowing, which could lead to a better understanding of the development of dual-purpose wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing increased wheat shoot growth rate.

Treatment
mowinge0
Outcome
shoot growth ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shoot growth rate increased, but root growth was inhibited after mowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing inhibited wheat root growth.

Treatment
mowinge0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shoot growth rate increased, but root growth was inhibited after mowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing decreased heterochromatin in wheat tillering node cells.

Organ / stage
tillering node celle0
Treatment
mowinge1
Outcome
heterochromatine0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in heterochromatin in the tillering node cell”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
e1

“root growth was inhibited after mowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing changed mitochondrial shape in the wheat tillering node and secondary root.

Organ / stage
tillering node and secondary roote0
Outcome
mitochondrial shapee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a change in mitochondrial shape in the tillering node and secondary root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat transcriptomes contained 2492 upregulated DEGs after mowing.

Outcome
upregulated DEGse0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
2492e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2492 upregulated DEGs and 1534 downregulated DEGs were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat transcriptomes contained 1534 downregulated DEGs after mowing.

Outcome
downregulated DEGse0
Direction
downregulatede0
Value
1534e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2492 upregulated DEGs and 1534 downregulated DEGs were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing induced DEGs in wheat phenylpropanoid biosynthesis.

Treatment
mowinge0
Outcome
expression of DEGs in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathwaye0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mowing induced expression of DEGs in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing increased PAL and 4CL activity in wheat.

Treatment
mowinge1
Gene
PAL and 4CLe0
Outcome
activity of PAL and 4CLe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the activity of PAL and 4CL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1008 · show in text ↑
e1

“mowing induced expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sugar degradation rate increased after mowing.

Outcome
sugar degradation ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sugar degradation rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing changed wheat DEGs in nitrogen metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, phenylpropanoid metabolism and the TCA pathway.

Treatment
mowinge0
Outcome
DEGs in the nitrogen metabolism pathway biosynthesis of the amino acids, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis metabolism, and in the TCA pathwaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DEGs in the nitrogen metabolism pathway biosynthesis of the amino acids, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis metabolism, and in the TCA pathway also changed after mowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing altered hormone content in wheat tillering and secondary roots.

Organ / stage
tillering and secondary rootse0
Treatment
mowinge0
Outcome
Hormone contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hormone content and related gene expression was also altered in the tillering and secondary roots after mowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing altered hormone-related gene expression in wheat tillering and secondary roots.

Organ / stage
tillering and secondary rootse0
Treatment
mowinge0
Outcome
related gene expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hormone content and related gene expression was also altered in the tillering and secondary roots after mowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasmonic acid increased wheat regeneration rate after mowing.

Treatment
jasmonic acide0
Outcome
regeneration ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When jasmonic acid and ethylene were used to treat the wheat after mowing, the regeneration rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene increased wheat regeneration rate after mowing.

Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
regeneration ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When jasmonic acid and ethylene were used to treat the wheat after mowing, the regeneration rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid inhibited wheat regrowth after mowing.

Treatment
abscisic acide0
Outcome
regrowthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“abscisic acid inhibited regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑

ethene · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

jasmonic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

pruning · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 10 positive, 23 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.