Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Does jasmonic acid mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress on wheat through the enhancement of ascorbate biosynthesis and the induction of glutamate dehydrogenase activity?

Faouzi Horchani; Amal Bouallegue; Zouhaier Abbes

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Background Salt stress is one of the most common abiotic stresses, reducing plant growth and productivity. Thus, the development of suitable management practices to minimize the deleterious effects of salt stress has become necessary. Aims This study was conducted to investigate the possible mechanisms underlying salt tolerance conferred by jasmonic acid (JA). Methods Salt‐stressed wheat seedlings were supplemented with 1 mM JA and/or 1 mM ibuprofen (IBU), an inhibitor of endogenous JA biosynthesis, in the culture medium. Results The obtained results showed that salt stress significantly decreased shoot and root dry weight production and relative water contents. This was associated with a noteworthy reduction in leaf and root ascorbate (AsA) concentrations, as well as glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamate synthase (GOGAT), and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activities. Exogenously supplied JA did not affect GS and GOGAT activities in leaves and roots of salt‐treated seedlings. However, noticeable enhancements were observed in growth, AsA concentrations, as well as GDH activities. Likewise, the inhibition of JA biosynthesis by IBU application was accompanied by a significant decrease in seedlings’ growth associated with a noticeable reduction in AsA concentrations and GDH activities. The decreases in growth and GDH activities were also obtained following inhibition of AsA biosynthesis by lycorine (Lyc) application. By contrast, increased GDH activities and enhanced growth were obtained following exogenous AsA supplementation, with or without JA biosynthesis inhibition. Conclusions The findings implied that exogenous JA enhanced AsA biosynthesis and induced GDH activity, which further promoted the growth of wheat seedlings in salt‐stressed conditions. Therefore, the stimulation of AsA biosynthesis and GDH activity through JA application in the rhizosphere may be suggested as a vital strategy for strengthening the salt tolerance of wheat plants, at least at the seedling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly decreased shoot and root dry weight and relative water contents.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weight production and relative water contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“salt stress significantly decreased shoot and root dry weight production and relative water contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced leaf and root ascorbate concentrations.

Treatment
salt stresse1
Outcome
leaf and root ascorbate (AsA) concentrationse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was associated with a noteworthy reduction in leaf and root ascorbate (AsA) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–775 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt stress significantly decreased shoot and root dry weight production and relative water contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced GS, GOGAT and GDH activities.

Treatment
salt stresse1
Outcome
glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamate synthase (GOGAT), and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activitiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“as well as glutamine synthetase (GS), glutamate synthase (GOGAT), and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt stress significantly decreased shoot and root dry weight production and relative water contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous JA did not affect GS and GOGAT activities in salt treated seedlings.

Treatment
Exogenously supplied JAe0
Outcome
GS and GOGAT activitiese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exogenously supplied JA did not affect GS and GOGAT activities in leaves and roots of salt‐treated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous JA enhanced growth, ascorbate concentrations and GDH activities.

Treatment
JAe1
Outcome
growth, AsA concentrations, as well as GDH activitiese0
Direction
enhancementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, noticeable enhancements were observed in growth, AsA concentrations, as well as GDH activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exogenously supplied JA did not affect GS and GOGAT activities in leaves and roots of salt‐treated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IBU inhibition of JA biosynthesis decreased seedling growth.

Treatment
IBU applicatione0
Outcome
seedlings’ growthe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“the inhibition of JA biosynthesis by IBU application was accompanied by a significant decrease in seedlings’ growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBU inhibition was accompanied by reduced AsA and GDH activity.

Treatment
IBUe1
Outcome
AsA concentrations and GDH activitiese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“a noticeable reduction in AsA concentrations and GDH activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1309 · show in text ↑
e1

“the inhibition of JA biosynthesis by IBU application was accompanied by a significant decrease in seedlings’ growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycorine inhibition of AsA biosynthesis decreased growth and GDH activity.

Treatment
lycorine (Lyc) applicatione0
Outcome
growth and GDH activitiese0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The decreases in growth and GDH activities were also obtained following inhibition of AsA biosynthesis by lycorine (Lyc) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous AsA increased GDH activity and growth with or without JA inhibition.

Treatment
exogenous AsA supplementatione0
Outcome
GDH activities and enhanced growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased GDH activities and enhanced growth were obtained following exogenous AsA supplementation, with or without JA biosynthesis inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1600 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors inferred JA stimulates AsA synthesis and GDH to promote growth under salt stress.

Treatment
exogenous JAe0
Outcome
growth of wheat seedlingse0
Qualifier
enhanced AsA biosynthesis and induced GDH activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“exogenous JA enhanced AsA biosynthesis and induced GDH activity, which further promoted the growth of wheat seedlings in salt‐stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1785 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest rhizosphere JA application to strengthen seedling salt tolerance.

Outcome
JA application in the rhizospheree0
Qualifier
at least at the seedling stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stimulation of AsA biosynthesis and GDH activity through JA application in the rhizosphere may be suggested as a vital strategy for strengthening the salt tolerance of wheat plants, at least at the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–2014 · show in text ↑

ibuprofen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ibuprofen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

jasmonic acid · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

L-ascorbic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

jasmonic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.