Paper · 2012 · Crop and Pasture Science

Dual-purpose use of winter wheat in western China: cutting time and nitrogen application effects on phenology, forage production, and grain yield

L. H. Tian; L. W. Bell; Y. Y. Shen; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Conventional rainfed mixed crop–livestock systems of western China lack high-quality forage and restrict livestock production. This study explored the forage potential from wheat and its effects on subsequent grain yield. Different cutting times were imposed on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) at Qingyang, Gansu Province, in two growing seasons, and the effect of nitrogen (N) topdressing rates (0, 60, and 120 kg N/ha) on grain yield recovery was explored. Results showed the potential to produce 0.8–1.6 t DM/ha of wheat forage with high nutritive value when cut before stem elongation (GS 30). In the wetter year, cutting before stem elongation did not delay crop development significantly (<3 days at anthesis and 5 days at maturity), but grain yields were reduced by 17–28% compared with the uncut crop (5.8 t DM/ha), mainly due to reductions in number of spikes per m2 and, consequently, number of grains per m2. In both seasons, more forage biomass was available if crops were cut later than GS 32, but this came with large reductions (>62%) in grain yield and delays in crop development (>9 days or 131 degree-days). Crops cut later than GS 30 had greatly reduced harvest index, tillers per m2, and total N uptake but higher grain protein content. There was no significant effect of N topdressing rate on grain yield, although provided the crop was cut before GS 30, higher rates of N increased maturity biomass and crop N uptake by replacing N removed in cut biomass. This study showed that physiological delay of wheat due to cutting was not significant. The forage harvested from winter wheat before stem elongation could be a valuable feed resource to fill the feed gap in western China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting before stem elongation produced 0.8–1.6 t DM/ha of high-value wheat forage.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cut before stem elongation (GS 30)e0
Outcome
wheat foragee0
Value
0.8–1.6 t DM/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“produce 0.8–1.6 t DM/ha of wheat forage with high nutritive value when cut before stem elongation (GS 30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early cutting delayed anthesis by <3 days in the wetter year without a significant effect.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Treatment
cutting before stem elongatione0
Outcome
crop developmente0
Direction
did not delaye0
Value
<3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“cutting before stem elongation did not delay crop development significantly (<3 days at anthesis and 5 days at maturity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early cutting delayed maturity by 5 days in the wetter year without a significant effect.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
maturitye0
Treatment
cutting before stem elongatione0
Outcome
crop developmente0
Direction
did not delaye0
Value
5 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“cutting before stem elongation did not delay crop development significantly (<3 days at anthesis and 5 days at maturity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early cutting reduced grain yields 17–28% relative to uncut wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17–28%e0
Qualifier
5.8 t DM/hae0
Comparator
uncut crope0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yields were reduced by 17–28% compared with the uncut crop (5.8 t DM/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early cutting reduced number of spikes per m2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
number of spikes per m2e0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“mainly due to reductions in number of spikes per m2 and, consequently, number of grains per m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early cutting reduced number of grains per m2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
number of grains per m2e0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“mainly due to reductions in number of spikes per m2 and, consequently, number of grains per m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting after GS 32 increased forage biomass.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cut later than GS 32e0
Outcome
forage biomasse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“more forage biomass was available if crops were cut later than GS 32”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later cutting reduced grain yield by more than 62%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
>62%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“this came with large reductions (>62%) in grain yield and delays in crop development (>9 days or 131 degree-days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later cutting delayed crop development by more than nine days or 131 degree-days.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
crop developmente0
Direction
delayse0
Value
>9 days or 131 degree-dayse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“this came with large reductions (>62%) in grain yield and delays in crop development (>9 days or 131 degree-days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting after GS 30 changed harvest index: reduced.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cut later than GS 30e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crops cut later than GS 30 had greatly reduced harvest index, tillers per m2, and total N uptake but higher grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting after GS 30 changed tillers per m2: reduced.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cut later than GS 30e0
Outcome
tillers per m2e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crops cut later than GS 30 had greatly reduced harvest index, tillers per m2, and total N uptake but higher grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting after GS 30 changed total N uptake: reduced.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cut later than GS 30e0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crops cut later than GS 30 had greatly reduced harvest index, tillers per m2, and total N uptake but higher grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting after GS 30 changed grain protein content: higher.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
cut later than GS 30e0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crops cut later than GS 30 had greatly reduced harvest index, tillers per m2, and total N uptake but higher grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing rate had no significant effect on grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N topdressing ratee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no significant effect of N topdressing rate on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates increased maturity biomass when wheat was cut before GS 30.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher rates of Ne0
Outcome
maturity biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher rates of N increased maturity biomass and crop N uptake by replacing N removed in cut biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates increased crop N uptake when wheat was cut before GS 30.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher rates of Ne0
Outcome
crop N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher rates of N increased maturity biomass and crop N uptake by replacing N removed in cut biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1477 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting winter wheat before stem elongation could help fill the forage gap in western China.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
harvested from winter wheat before stem elongatione0
Setting
western Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The forage harvested from winter wheat before stem elongation could be a valuable feed resource to fill the feed gap in western China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1700 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 10 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.