Abstract
Among the factors that limit the productive potential of soybean crops, stands out lodging, in addition to competition with weeds. Given this, the importance of soybean pre-emergence herbicides for different purposes is highlighted; however, they have to be evaluated for selectivity. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and agronomic performance of soybean applied with pre-emergence herbicides. Experiment 1 was conducted in the 2017-2018 season at two locations, and experiment 2 in the 2016-2017 season at one location. Treatments consisted of the application of pre-emergence herbicides in soybean in a randomized block design with four replications. Crop injury and chlorophyll indices (experiment 1) and variables related to agronomic performance (experiments 1 and 2) were assessed. Diclosulam and chlorimuron showed potential for application at pre-emergence to reduce plant height and consequently plant lodging. Moreover, diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean. This study evidenced the selectivity of pre-emergence herbicides to soybean.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Diclosulam applied at pre-emergence showed potential to reduce soybean height and lodging.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- Diclosulame0
- Outcome
- plant height and consequently plant lodginge0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“Diclosulam and chlorimuron showed potential for application at pre-emergence to reduce plant height and consequently plant lodging.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorimuron applied at pre-emergence showed potential to reduce soybean height and lodging.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- chlorimurone0
- Outcome
- plant height and consequently plant lodginge0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“soybean”
e0“Diclosulam and chlorimuron showed potential for application at pre-emergence to reduce plant height and consequently plant lodging.”
Claim · model-written summary
diclosulam applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- diclosulame0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
chlorimuron applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- chlorimurone0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
sulfentrazone applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- sulfentrazonee0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
flumioxazin applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- flumioxazine0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
s-metolachlor applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- s-metolachlore0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
pendimethalin applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- pendimethaline0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
trifluralin applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- trifluraline0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
imazethapyr/flumioxazin applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- imazethapyr/flumioxazine0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
oxyfluorfen applied at pre-emergence did not negatively affect soybean agronomic performance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- oxyfluorfene0
- Outcome
- agronomic performancee0
- Direction
- did not negatively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“diclosulam, chlorimuron, sulfentrazone, flumioxazin, s-metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and oxyfluorfen did not negatively affect agronomic performance when applied at pre-emergence of soybean.”
The same questions in other papers
chlorimuron · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →sulfentrazone · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →trifluralin · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →chlorimuron · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →pendimethalin · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →Imazethapyr · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →Oxyfluorfen · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Diclosulam · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.