Paper · 2023 · ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

Differences among three wheat cultivars in susceptibility to Fusarium culmorum and the effect of a number of bacterial strains on infested seed germination

Tahsein A. M. Amein

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat seedling blight caused by Fusarium culmorum, is one of the most common among wheat diseases. Last decades, use of resistant cultivars and biological control by antagonistic micro-organisms have received much attention. Resistance levels of three wheat cultivars (Saber Bag, Smito and Sham 5) to this disease was assessed under greenhouse conditions. None of the cultivars was high resistant but Saber Bag showed the highest germination rate 63.3%. This was 11% more than the two other cultivars. In a dual culture three bacterial strains, two Bacillus and one Pseudomonas had very good effect in inhibition of the mycelium growth of this fungus. Bacterial strain Bacillus sp M1, B. subtilis K3 and Pseudomonas sp 53 inhibited the fungal mycelium growth by 100%, 97.5 %, and 98% respectively. In greenhouse experiments, bacterial strain M1 increased the number of seed germinations by 50% compared to untreated Fusarium control in cv. Sham5 and 43% in cv. Smito. Also strain 53 increased the number of germinations by 35% in cv. Smito.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No cultivar was highly resistant to Fusarium seedling blight.

Outcome
None of the cultivars was high resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the cultivars was high resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saber Bag had the highest germination rate, 63.3%.

Material
Saber Bage0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
63.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Saber Bag showed the highest germination rate 63.3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saber Bag germination was 11% more than the other two cultivars.

Outcome
Thise0
Direction
moree0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
the two other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was 11% more than the two other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus sp M1 inhibited Fusarium mycelial growth by 100%.

Treatment
Bacillus sp M1e0
Interactor
Bacillus sp M1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fungal mycelium growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial strain Bacillus sp M1, B. subtilis K3 and Pseudomonas sp 53 inhibited the fungal mycelium growth by 100%, 97.5 %, and 98% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis K3 inhibited Fusarium mycelial growth by 97.5 %.

Treatment
B. subtilis K3e0
Interactor
B. subtilis K3Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fungal mycelium growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
97.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial strain Bacillus sp M1, B. subtilis K3 and Pseudomonas sp 53 inhibited the fungal mycelium growth by 100%, 97.5 %, and 98% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas sp 53 inhibited Fusarium mycelial growth by 98%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas sp 53e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp 53e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fungal mycelium growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial strain Bacillus sp M1, B. subtilis K3 and Pseudomonas sp 53 inhibited the fungal mycelium growth by 100%, 97.5 %, and 98% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M1 increased Sham5 seed germinations by 50% versus untreated Fusarium control.

Material
Sham5e0
Treatment
bacterial strain M1e0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
M1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of seed germinationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
untreated Fusarium controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial strain M1 increased the number of seed germinations by 50% compared to untreated Fusarium control in cv. Sham5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M1 increased Smito seed germinations by 43%.

Material
Smitoe0
Treatment
M1t1
Outcome
germinationst1
Direction
increasedt1
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and 43% in cv. Smito.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑
t1

“bacterial strain M1 increased the number of seed germinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 53 increased Smito seed germinations by 35%.

Material
Smitoe0
Treatment
strain 53e0
Interactor
strain 53e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of germinationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain 53 increased the number of germinations by 35% in cv. Smito.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Pseudomonas · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.