Paper · 2025 · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment

Integrating Synthetic Community With Chemical Fungicide Improves the Control of Rhizoctonia Bare Patch Disease in Wheat

Wajira Nandanee Gamachchige Galhena; Juntao Wang; Bruna D. Batista; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The soil borne pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG8 causes Rhizoctonia bare patch disease, a major constraint on global wheat production, particularly in no- or minimal -till systems. Current control strategies such as crop rotation, chemical fungicides, and tillage provide only partial protection, while fungicides can accelerate resistance development and negatively impact crop, soil, and human health. Microbial biological control agents (BCAs) and synthetic communities (SynComs, combining two or more BCAs) represent a sustainable alternative for managing Rhizoctonia bare patch. However, inconsistent efficacy and limited compatibility with fungicides remain key challenges to adoption. Here, we demonstrated that individual BCAs and a SynCom (comprising Diaporthe sp. and Pseudomonas sp. KAR75) reduced disease incidence at the seedling stage by 51–71% compared with fungicide treatment. When combined with fungicide, disease incidence was further reduced by 65–100%. The BCA treatments also improved grain yield by 9–12% compared with fungicide treatment and by 11–15% compared to no-pathogen control, demonstrating their ability to promote wheat growth in the absence of disease. Grain yield increased most with the fungal-bacterial SynCom, particularly when applied together with fungicide. These results demonstrated that integrating BCAs with chemical fungicides has strong potential to improve control of soil-borne diseases in grain crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual biological control agents reduced seedling disease incidence by 51–71% relative to fungicide treatment.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Treatment
individual BCAse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
51–71%e0
Comparator
fungicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“individual BCAs and a SynCom (comprising Diaporthe sp. and Pseudomonas sp. KAR75) reduced disease incidence at the seedling stage by 51–71% compared with fungicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Diaporthe and Pseudomonas synthetic community reduced seedling disease incidence by 51–71% relative to fungicide treatment.

Treatment
a SynCom (comprising Diaporthe sp. and Pseudomonas sp. KAR75)e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
51–71%e0
Comparator
fungicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“a SynCom (comprising Diaporthe sp. and Pseudomonas sp. KAR75) reduced disease incidence at the seedling stage by 51–71% compared with fungicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining the biological control treatments with fungicide further reduced disease incidence by 65–100%.

Treatment
combined with fungicidee0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
65–100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“When combined with fungicide, disease incidence was further reduced by 65–100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological control treatments improved wheat grain yield by 9–12% relative to fungicide treatment.

Treatment
BCA treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
9–12%e0
Comparator
fungicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The BCA treatments also improved grain yield by 9–12% compared with fungicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological control treatments improved grain yield by 11–15% relative to the no-pathogen control.

Outcome
Wheatt0
Value
11–15%e0
Comparator
no-pathogen controle0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“by 11–15% compared to no-pathogen control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased most with the fungal-bacterial synthetic community, particularly with fungicide.

Treatment
fungal-bacterial SynCome0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increased moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield increased most with the fungal-bacterial SynCom, particularly when applied together with fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1305 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.