Paper · 2023 · Foods

Effects of Hydroxyethyl Cellulose and Sulfated Rice Bran Polysaccharide Coating on Quality Maintenance of Cherry Tomatoes during Cold Storage

Guige Liu; Bingjie Chen; Hongru Liu; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cherry tomatoes are easily damaged due to their high moisture content. A composite coating was developed to delay deterioration and prolong storage by mixing antibacterial sulfated rice bran polysaccharides (SRBP) and edible hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) with film-forming properties. The effects of HEC, HEC-5% SRBP, and HEC-20% SRBP preservative coatings on the maintenance of the quality of cherry tomatoes (LycopersivonesculentumMill., Xiaohuang F2) during cold storage were investigated. The HEC-20% SRBP coating significantly reduced tomato deterioration and weight loss, delayed firmness loss, decreased polyphenol oxidase activity, and increased peroxidase activity. Furthermore, cherry tomatoes treated with HEC-20% SRBP maintained high levels of titratable acid, ascorbic acid, total phenols, and carotenoids. Cherry tomatoes coated with HEC-SRBP also had higher levels of volatile substances and a greater variety of these substances compared to uncoated tomatoes. In conclusion, the HEC-20% SRBP coating effectively delayed deterioration and preserved cherry tomatoes’ nutrient and flavor qualities during postharvest cold storage, suggesting it could be a novel food preservation method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-20% SRBP reduced cherry tomato deterioration and weight loss.

Treatment
HEC-20% SRBP coatinge0
Outcome
tomato deterioration and weight losse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The HEC-20% SRBP coating significantly reduced tomato deterioration and weight loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-20% SRBP delayed cherry tomato firmness loss.

Treatment
HEC-20% SRBP coatinge0
Outcome
firmness losse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The HEC-20% SRBP coating significantly reduced tomato deterioration and weight loss, delayed firmness loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-20% SRBP decreased tomato polyphenol oxidase activity.

Treatment
HEC-20% SRBP coatinge0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The HEC-20% SRBP coating significantly reduced tomato deterioration and weight loss, delayed firmness loss, decreased polyphenol oxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-20% SRBP increased tomato peroxidase activity.

Treatment
HEC-20% SRBP coatinge0
Outcome
peroxidase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The HEC-20% SRBP coating significantly reduced tomato deterioration and weight loss, delayed firmness loss, decreased polyphenol oxidase activity, and increased peroxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-20% SRBP maintained high titratable acid, ascorbic acid, and total phenols in cherry tomatoes.

Treatment
HEC-20% SRBPe0
Outcome
titratable acid, ascorbic acid, total phenolse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomatoes treated with HEC-20% SRBP maintained high levels of titratable acid, ascorbic acid, total phenols, and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-20% SRBP maintained high carotenoids in cherry tomatoes.

Treatment
HEC-20% SRBPe0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomatoes treated with HEC-20% SRBP maintained high levels of titratable acid, ascorbic acid, total phenols, and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-SRBP coating increased cherry tomato volatile substance levels relative to uncoated tomatoes.

Treatment
HEC-SRBPe0
Outcome
levels of volatile substancese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uncoated tomatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes coated with HEC-SRBP also had higher levels of volatile substances and a greater variety of these substances compared to uncoated tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEC-SRBP coating increased the variety of cherry tomato volatile substances relative to uncoated tomatoes.

Treatment
HEC-SRBPe0
Outcome
variety of these substancese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
uncoated tomatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes coated with HEC-SRBP also had higher levels of volatile substances and a greater variety of these substances compared to uncoated tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–973 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

polysaccharide · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

polysaccharide · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Oryza sativa · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Oryza sativa · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

polysaccharide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 141 positive, 17 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.