Paper · 2011 · American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Effect of Edible Coatings, Storage Time and Maturity Stage on Overall Quality of Tomato Fruits

Davila-Avina

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Problem statement: Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is one of the most widely consumed fresh vegetables in the world; however, its highly perishable nature limits its postharvest life. Major losses in tomato quality and quantity occur between harvest and consumption. Therefore, the application of new technologies to extend the postharvest life of this commodity is needed. The use of edible coatings appears to be a good alternative. Approach: We evaluated the effect of carnauba and mineral oil coatings on the postharvest quality of tomato fruits (cv. "Grandela"). Stafresh 2505 (carnauba) and Stafresh 151 (mineral oil) coatings were applied on fresh tomatoes at two maturity stages (breaker and pink). The quality of tomatoes was evaluated periodically at 0, 5, 10, 15, 21 and 28 days of storage at 10C, plus 2 days at 20C. For respiration rate analysis, tomatoes were kept at 20C for 16 days. Results: At the beginning of the study, CO 2 production was reduced by 38 and 46% when applying the mineral oil coating on breaker and pink tomatoes, respectively. In addition, early during the study, the mineral oil coating showed suppression of ethylene biosynthesis at both maturity stages. Both coatings reduced 30% PG activity of tomato tissue. At the end of storage, mineral oil coatings delayed color changes and reduced weight losses for up 70 and 46% at the breaker and pink stages, respectively. Conclusion/Recommendations: Respiration rate, color, weight loss and enzyme activity were positively affected by mineral oil coating at both maturity stages. No effects on firmness, titratable acidity and pH were found by the coating application. We concluded that mineral oil coating could be a good alternative to preserve the quality and extend the postharvest life of tomato fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil coating reduced initial CO 2 production at the named maturity stage.

Organ / stage
breakere0
Treatment
mineral oil coatinge0
Outcome
CO 2 productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the beginning of the study, CO 2 production was reduced by 38 and 46% when applying the mineral oil coating on breaker and pink tomatoes, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil coating reduced initial CO 2 production at the named maturity stage.

Organ / stage
pinke0
Treatment
mineral oil coatinge0
Outcome
CO 2 productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the beginning of the study, CO 2 production was reduced by 38 and 46% when applying the mineral oil coating on breaker and pink tomatoes, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil coating suppressed ethylene biosynthesis at both maturity stages early in storage.

Treatment
mineral oil coatinge0
Outcome
ethylene biosynthesise0
Direction
suppressione0
Qualifier
both maturity stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early during the study, the mineral oil coating showed suppression of ethylene biosynthesis at both maturity stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named coating reduced tomato PG activity by 30%.

Treatment
Stafresh 2505e1
Outcome
PG activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both coatings reduced 30% PG activity of tomato tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stafresh 2505 (carnauba) and Stafresh 151 (mineral oil) coatings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named coating reduced tomato PG activity by 30%.

Treatment
Stafresh 151e1
Outcome
PG activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both coatings reduced 30% PG activity of tomato tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stafresh 2505 (carnauba) and Stafresh 151 (mineral oil) coatings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil coating delayed color change at storage end.

Treatment
mineral oil coatingse0
Outcome
color changese0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of storage, mineral oil coatings delayed color changes and reduced weight losses for up 70 and 46% at the breaker and pink stages, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1411 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil coating reduced weight loss at the named stage.

Organ / stage
breakere0
Treatment
mineral oil coatingse0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of storage, mineral oil coatings delayed color changes and reduced weight losses for up 70 and 46% at the breaker and pink stages, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1411 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil coating reduced weight loss at the named stage.

Organ / stage
pinke0
Treatment
mineral oil coatingse0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of storage, mineral oil coatings delayed color changes and reduced weight losses for up 70 and 46% at the breaker and pink stages, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1411 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating application had no detected effect on the named quality trait.

Treatment
coating applicatione0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
No effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effects on firmness, titratable acidity and pH were found by the coating application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1658 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating application had no detected effect on the named quality trait.

Treatment
coating applicatione0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
No effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effects on firmness, titratable acidity and pH were found by the coating application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1658 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating application had no detected effect on the named quality trait.

Treatment
coating applicatione0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
No effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effects on firmness, titratable acidity and pH were found by the coating application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1658 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended mineral oil coating to preserve quality and extend postharvest life.

Outcome
mineral oil coating could be a good alternative to preserve the quality and extend the postharvest lifee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral oil coating could be a good alternative to preserve the quality and extend the postharvest life of tomato fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1797 · show in text ↑

storage · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · physiology: respiration · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 141 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 141 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.