Abstract
Faced with the contrasting results of inoculation and co-inoculation in the bean crop, an experiment was carried out in pots, with the objective of evaluating the performance of the bean plant in treatments inoculated or co-inoculated with Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense, via seeds, with or without chemical treatment with fungicide and insecticide, combined with 4 top-dressing nitrogen doses (0, 30, 60, and 120 kg ha-1), in a ‘Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo distrófico arenoso’ soil collected from the surface layer from 0 to 0.20 m depth. The results of the Scott Knott test and regression showed that co-inoculation via seeds did not alter vegetative growth, components, and grain yield. However, without chemical treatment, co-inoculation increased plant root volume. Root dry matter production was higher when only A. brasilense was used and when combined with fungicide, or with insecticide and R. tropici. While the combination of fungicide, insecticide and A. brasilense increased the dry matter production of shoots and grains per plant. Even with inoculation or co-inoculation, there was a linear response of the common bean to top-dressing fertilization up to 120 kg ha-1 of N in vegetative and root growth, pod production and grain per pod.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Seed co-inoculation did not alter vegetative growth, yield components or grain yield.
- Taxon
- beant0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation via seedse0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, components, and grain yielde0
- Direction
- did not altere0
Not reportedInteractorComparator
Verbatim
e0“co-inoculation via seeds did not alter vegetative growth, components, and grain yield”
t0“bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Without chemical treatment, co-inoculation increased root volume.
- Taxon
- beant0
- Treatment
- co-inoculatione0
- Outcome
- plant root volumee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- without chemical treatmente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“without chemical treatment, co-inoculation increased plant root volume”
t0“bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Root dry matter was higher with A. brasilense alone.
- Taxon
- beant0
- Treatment
- only A. brasilensee0
- Interactor
- A. brasilense
Azospirillum brasilensee0symbiont - Outcome
- Root dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root dry matter production was higher when only A. brasilense was used and when combined with fungicide, or with insecticide and R. tropici”
t0“bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Root dry matter was higher with A. brasilense and fungicide.
- Taxon
- beant0
- Treatment
- combined with fungicidee0
- Interactor
- A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
- Outcome
- Root dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root dry matter production was higher when only A. brasilense was used and when combined with fungicide, or with insecticide and R. tropici”
t0“bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Root dry matter was higher with A. brasilense, insecticide and R. tropici.
- Taxon
- beant0
- Treatment
- with insecticide and R. tropicie0
- Interactor
- R. tropici
Martinezella tropicie0symbiont - Outcome
- Root dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root dry matter production was higher when only A. brasilense was used and when combined with fungicide, or with insecticide and R. tropici”
t0“bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide, insecticide and A. brasilense increased shoot dry matter and grains per plant.
- Taxon
- beant0
- Treatment
- combination of fungicide, insecticide and A. brasilensee0
- Interactor
- A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
- Outcome
- dry matter production of shoots and grains per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the combination of fungicide, insecticide and A. brasilense increased the dry matter production of shoots and grains per plant”
t0“bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Top-dressed nitrogen produced linear vegetative and root growth responses through 120 kg ha-1, even with inoculation.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise0 - Treatment
- top-dressing fertilization up to 120 kg ha-1 of Ne0
- Outcome
- vegetative and root growthe0
- Direction
- linear responsee0
- Qualifier
- Even with inoculation or co-inoculatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Even with inoculation or co-inoculation, there was a linear response of the common bean to top-dressing fertilization up to 120 kg ha-1 of N in vegetative and root growth, pod production and grain per pod”
t0“bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Top-dressed nitrogen produced linear pod production and grains per pod responses through 120 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- top-dressing fertilization up to 120 kg ha-1 of Ne0
- Outcome
- pod production and grain per pode0
- Direction
- linear responsee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Even with inoculation or co-inoculation, there was a linear response of the common bean to top-dressing fertilization up to 120 kg ha-1 of N in vegetative and root growth, pod production and grain per pod”
t0“bean”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Martinezella tropici · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →fungicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →insecticide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →fertilization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
139 papers more in this group
See all 143 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
372 papers more in this group
See all 376 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.