Paper · 1980 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Chemical control of chocolate spot disease of field beans

Severa A. Doto; W. J. Whittington

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The ability of two chemicals, Benlate and BAS352-04F, to control chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba ) was examined in five small-plot or field experiments. The incidence of the fungus was never such as to reach the aggressive stage naturally, although severe infection was induced temporarily in certain experiments by enclosing the plots in plastic-covered boxes after inoculation with fungus. Increasing the recommended dose of BAS352-04F but not Benlate resulted in improved control and applying either chemical twice was preferable to a single application. Control by BAS352-04F was sometimes better than Benlate in the early days after infection whereas the reverse was true later. These results are in keeping with their roles as contact, and systemic and contact fungicides respectively. In these small experiments, with low levels of infection, the use of fungicides did not result in significant increases in yield or yield components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the recommended dose of BAS352-04F improved control of chocolate spot in field beans.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
Increasing the recommended dose of BAS352-04Fe1
Interactor
Botrytis fabaeBotrytis fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
controle1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
recommended dosee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis fabae
Botrytis fabae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the recommended dose of BAS352-04F but not Benlate resulted in improved control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the recommended dose of Benlate did not improve control of chocolate spot in field beans.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
Benlatee1
Interactor
Botrytis fabaeBotrytis fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
controle1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
recommended dosee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis fabae
Botrytis fabae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the recommended dose of BAS352-04F but not Benlate resulted in improved control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying either fungicide twice was preferable to a single application for chocolate spot control.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
applying either chemical twicee2
Interactor
Botrytis fabaeBotrytis fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
preferablee2
Direction
preferablee2
Comparator
a single applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis fabae
Botrytis fabae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144 · show in text ↑
e2

“applying either chemical twice was preferable to a single application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAS352-04F sometimes gave better control than Benlate in the early days after infection.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
BAS352-04Fe3
Interactor
Botrytis fabaeBotrytis fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
Controle3
Direction
bettere3
Qualifier
in the early days after infectione3
Comparator
Benlatee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis fabae
Botrytis fabae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144 · show in text ↑
e3

“Control by BAS352-04F was sometimes better than Benlate in the early days after infection whereas the reverse was true later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later after infection, Benlate gave better control than BAS352-04F.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
Benlatee3
Interactor
Botrytis fabaeBotrytis fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
Controle3
Direction
bettere3
Qualifier
latere3
Comparator
BAS352-04Fe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis fabae
Botrytis fabae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144 · show in text ↑
e3

“Control by BAS352-04F was sometimes better than Benlate in the early days after infection whereas the reverse was true later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In these small experiments with low infection levels, fungicide use did not significantly increase yield or yield components.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
fungicidese4
Outcome
yield or yield componentse4
Direction
did not result in significant increasese4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144 · show in text ↑
e4

“the use of fungicides did not result in significant increases in yield or yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The incidence of the fungus never naturally reached an aggressive stage in the experiments.

Taxon
field beanse0
Interactor
Botrytis fabaeBotrytis fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of the funguse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis fabae
Botrytis fabae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144 · show in text ↑
e5

“The incidence of the fungus was never such as to reach the aggressive stage naturally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–284 · show in text ↑

benomyl · Botrytis fabae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Benomyl sprays reduced chocolate spot compared with untreated or other fungicide sprayed beans.

    Use of fungicides to control chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) on winter field beans ( Vicia faba ) · 1985 · compared with untreated beans or beans sprayed with iprodione, prochloraz or thiabendazole

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.