Abstract
ABSTRACT This work aimed to evaluate the phytotechnical performance of the succession involving pre-croppings of maize and Mucuna pruriens (velvet bean) or the intercropping of these species in the agroecological cultivation of broccoli in the presence and absence of fermented compost fertilization. The experimental design was in randomized blocks in a factorial scheme 2 (maize monoculture or intercropped with velvet bean) x 2 (absence and presence of fermented compost fertilization) + 1 (velvet bean monoculture and without fertilization). After cutting the maize and velvet bean biomass, the broccoli seedlings were transplanted. In this stage, the design was in randomized blocks in a 3-factorial scheme (maize monoculture; maize intercropped with velvet bean; velvet bean monoculture) x 2 (presence and absence of fermented compost fertilization). The authors concluded that when the velvet bean was introduced into maize cultivation system no negatively interference was noticed concerning to phytotechnical components of baby corn, and it even allows an additional of 3.46 and 7.75 t/ha of fabaceous phytomass, respectively, in the first and second year. In the absence of fertilization, phytomasses of the intercroppings provided broccoli productivity of 12.87 t/ha, which represents an increase of 43.73% when compared to maize monoculture in the second year. An effect of fertilization with the fermented compost on broccoli cultivation under these study conditions was verified, providing a greater accumulation of N in the inflorescences in the first year and maximum productivity of 12.19 and 14.32 t/ha, respectively, first and second years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Velvet bean introduction did not negatively affect baby corn phytotechnical components.
- Treatment
- velvet beane0
- Outcome
- phytotechnical components of baby corne0
- Direction
- no negatively interferencee0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when the velvet bean was introduced into maize cultivation system no negatively interference was noticed concerning to phytotechnical components of baby corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Velvet bean introduction added 3.46 t/ha of fabaceous phytomass in year one.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it even allows an additional of 3.46 and 7.75 t/ha of fabaceous phytomass, respectively, in the first and second year”
e1“when the velvet bean was introduced”
t0“maize cultivation system”
Claim · model-written summary
Velvet bean introduction added 7.75 t/ha of fabaceous phytomass in year two.
- Treatment
- velvet beane1
- Outcome
- fabaceous phytomasse0
- Direction
- additionale0
- Value
- 7.75 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- second yeare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it even allows an additional of 3.46 and 7.75 t/ha of fabaceous phytomass, respectively, in the first and second year”
e1“when the velvet bean was introduced”
t0“maize cultivation system”
Claim · model-written summary
Without fertilization, intercropping phytomass raised broccoli productivity to 12.87 t/ha, 43.73% above maize monoculture.
- Taxon
- broccoli
Brassica oleracea var. italicae0 - Treatment
- phytomasses of the intercroppingse0
- Outcome
- broccoli productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 12.87 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 43.73%e0
- Comparator
- maize monoculturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the absence of fertilization, phytomasses of the intercroppings provided broccoli productivity of 12.87 t/ha, which represents an increase of 43.73% when compared to maize monoculture in the second year”
Claim · model-written summary
Fermented compost increased N accumulation in broccoli inflorescences in year one.
- Taxon
- broccoliBrassica oleracea var. italicae0
- Treatment
- fertilization with the fermented composte0
- Outcome
- accumulation of N in the inflorescencese0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- first yeare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fertilization with the fermented compost on broccoli cultivation under these study conditions was verified, providing a greater accumulation of N in the inflorescences in the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
Fermented compost provided maximum broccoli productivity of 12.19 t/ha in year one.
- Taxon
- broccoliBrassica oleracea var. italicat0
- Treatment
- fermented composte1
- Outcome
- maximum productivitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 12.19e0
- Qualifier
- firste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum productivity of 12.19 and 14.32 t/ha, respectively, first and second years”
e1“fertilization with the fermented compost”
t0“broccoli”
Claim · model-written summary
Fermented compost provided maximum broccoli productivity of 14.32 t/ha in year two.
- Taxon
- broccoliBrassica oleracea var. italicat0
- Treatment
- fermented composte1
- Outcome
- maximum productivitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 14.32 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- second yearse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum productivity of 12.19 and 14.32 t/ha, respectively, first and second years”
e1“fertilization with the fermented compost”
t0“broccoli”
The same questions in other papers
Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
processing · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →processing · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →intercropping · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
492 papers more in this group
See all 496 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.