Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

Effects of wheat undersowing and sweet alyssum intercropping on aphid and flea beetle infestation in white cabbage in Germany and Japan

A. Köneke; R. Uesugi; A. Herz; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract An undersowing system with additional intercropping of flowering plants was assessed in field trials in Germany and Japan to estimate regulating effects on pests and possible negative effects on white cabbage ( Brassica oleracea var. capitata ). In particular, we tested cabbage undersown with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and cabbage undersown with wheat plus additional sweet alyssum ( Lobularia maritima L. Desv.) intercropping. Counts of the aphid species Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) and Myzus persicae (Sulzer), as well as related predators on cabbage plants, were determined. Abundance of Phyllotreta spp. flea beetles and their feeding damage on cabbage plants were recorded and cabbage yield was compared. In both countries, trials showed that wheat undersowing reduced the abundance of M. persicae but not B. brassicae . The occurrence of natural enemies on cabbage plants was not significantly affected by any of the companion plants. Additional sweet alyssum intercropping increased the abundance of adult hoverflies at the German but not at the Japanese location. However, it also significantly increased flea beetle infestation on cabbage plants at both locations. Neither wheat undersowing nor additional sweet alyssum intercropping significantly reduced cabbage harvest weight. In conclusion, adding companion plants can be a promising method to improve pest control in vegetable crops. However, intercropping crucifer crops with sweet alyssum may not be recommended in regions where flea beetles are a relevant pest because of the observed enhancing effect on them. In contrast, to prove the positive effect of wheat undersowing on white cabbage, results from further years of investigation are needed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat undersowing reduced M. persicae abundance in both countries.

Treatment
wheat undersowinge0
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
abundance of M. persicaee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both countries, trials showed that wheat undersowing reduced the abundance of M. persicae but not B. brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cabbage plants, were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat undersowing did not reduce B. brassicae abundance.

Treatment
wheat undersowinge0
Interactor
B. brassicaeBrevicoryne brassicaee0pest
Outcome
B. brassicaee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brevicoryne brassicae
Brevicoryne brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both countries, trials showed that wheat undersowing reduced the abundance of M. persicae but not B. brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cabbage plants, were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion plants did not significantly affect natural enemies on cabbage.

Treatment
companion plantse0
Interactor
natural enemiese0other
Outcome
occurrence of natural enemiese0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The occurrence of natural enemies on cabbage plants was not significantly affected by any of the companion plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet alyssum intercropping increased adult hoverflies in Germany.

Treatment
sweet alyssum intercroppinge0
Interactor
adult hoverfliese0other
Outcome
abundance of adult hoverfliese0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Germane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional sweet alyssum intercropping increased the abundance of adult hoverflies at the German but not at the Japanese location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cabbage plants, were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet alyssum intercropping did not increase adult hoverflies in Japan.

Treatment
sweet alyssum intercroppinge0
Interactor
adult hoverfliese0other
Outcome
abundance of adult hoverfliese0
Direction
note0
Setting
Japanesee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional sweet alyssum intercropping increased the abundance of adult hoverflies at the German but not at the Japanese location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“on cabbage plants, were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet alyssum intercropping significantly increased cabbage flea beetle infestation at both locations.

Interactor
flea beetlee0pest
Outcome
flea beetle infestatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it also significantly increased flea beetle infestation on cabbage plants at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

wheat undersowing did not significantly reduce cabbage harvest weight.

Treatment
wheat undersowinge0
Outcome
cabbage harvest weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither wheat undersowing nor additional sweet alyssum intercropping significantly reduced cabbage harvest weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

additional sweet alyssum intercropping did not significantly reduce cabbage harvest weight.

Treatment
additional sweet alyssum intercroppinge0
Outcome
cabbage harvest weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither wheat undersowing nor additional sweet alyssum intercropping significantly reduced cabbage harvest weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1300 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against sweet alyssum intercropping with crucifer crops where flea beetles are relevant pests.

Taxon
white cabbaget0
Interactor
flea beetlesAlticinie0pest
Outcome
may not be recommendede0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping crucifer crops with sweet alyssum may not be recommended in regions where flea beetles are a relevant pest because of the observed enhancing effect on them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–114 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

intercropping · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 35 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.