Paper · 2015 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Control of head size and nutritional value of cabbage by plant population and nitrogen fertilization.

E. Kołota; P. Chohura

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Small size of cabbage heads around 2.0 kg, preferred by the fresh market, may be attained by the choice of cultivar suitable for such purpose of production as well as culture practice, including reasonable rate of fertilization. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of increasing plant population combined with differentiated dose of nitrogen on yield of cabbage, its structure and plant composition. White head cabbage ‘Kalorama F1’ cv. was planted in rows 45 cm apart and 50, 40, 35 or 30 cm within rows, which assured 44 000, 55 000, 63 000 and 74 000 plants per 1 ha, respectively. Nitrogen at the rates of 150 or 300 kg ha-1 was used in 3 equal doses supplied as preplant and top dressing fertilization. Data obtained in the trial indicate that the dose of 150 kg N ha-1 was a limiting factor for the increment of crop yield in higher than 44 000 plant population per 1 ha. In the case of application the dose of 300 kg N ha-1 plants grown in population 63 000 and 74 000 per hectare produced significantly higher yield of heads if compared to the treatment with 44 000 plants. Taking into account the yield size and its structure it can be assumed that spacing 45 cm between plant rows and 40 cm distance in the row, which assure 55 000 plants per 1 ha is the optimum for production of cabbage heads weighted 1.0–2.0 kg, that meet the consumers expectation in the fresh market. Close plant spacing appeared to be beneficial for dry matter, vitamin C and total sugars contents and for decrease of nitrates accumulation. The enhancement of N dose to 300 kg N ha-1 was beneficial for total yield of heads as well those weighted > 1.0 kg. The only change in plant composition under influence of heavy N fertilization was the increment of nitrates accumulation and decrease of Ca content in cabbage heads.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N ha-1 limited yield increments above 44 000 plants per hectare.

Treatment
150 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
limitinge0
Qualifier
higher than 44 000 plant population per 1 hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dose of 150 kg N ha-1 was a limiting factor for the increment of crop yield in higher than 44 000 plant population per 1 ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 kg N ha-1, 63 000 plants per hectare yielded significantly more heads than 44 000 plants.

Treatment
63 000e0
Outcome
yield of headse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
300 kg N ha-1e0
Comparator
44 000 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of application the dose of 300 kg N ha-1 plants grown in population 63 000 and 74 000 per hectare produced significantly higher yield of heads if compared to the treatment with 44 000 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 kg N ha-1, 74 000 plants per hectare yielded significantly more heads than 44 000 plants.

Treatment
74 000 per hectaree0
Outcome
yield of headse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
300 kg N ha-1e0
Comparator
44 000 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of application the dose of 300 kg N ha-1 plants grown in population 63 000 and 74 000 per hectare produced significantly higher yield of heads if compared to the treatment with 44 000 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose 45 by 40 cm spacing, giving 55 000 plants per hectare, as optimal for 1.0–2.0 kg market heads.

Outcome
spacing 45 cm between plant rows and 40 cm distance in the rowe0
Value
55 000 plants per 1 hae0
Qualifier
heads weighted 1.0–2.0 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spacing 45 cm between plant rows and 40 cm distance in the row, which assure 55 000 plants per 1 ha is the optimum for production of cabbage heads weighted 1.0–2.0 kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Close spacing benefited dry matter, vitamin C and total sugar contents.

Treatment
Close plant spacinge0
Outcome
dry matter, vitamin C and total sugars contentse0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Close plant spacing appeared to be beneficial for dry matter, vitamin C and total sugars contents and for decrease of nitrates accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Close spacing decreased nitrate accumulation.

Treatment
Close plant spacinge0
Outcome
nitrates accumulatione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Close plant spacing appeared to be beneficial for dry matter, vitamin C and total sugars contents and for decrease of nitrates accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N to 300 kg N ha-1 benefited total head yield and yield of heads above 1.0 kg.

Treatment
enhancement of N dose to 300 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
total yield of heads as well those weighted > 1.0 kge0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement of N dose to 300 kg N ha-1 was beneficial for total yield of heads as well those weighted > 1.0 kg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1651 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy N fertilization increased nitrate accumulation in cabbage heads.

Organ / stage
headse0
Treatment
heavy N fertilizatione0
Outcome
nitrates accumulatione0
Direction
incremente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The only change in plant composition under influence of heavy N fertilization was the increment of nitrates accumulation and decrease of Ca content in cabbage heads.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy N fertilization decreased Ca content in cabbage heads.

Organ / stage
headse0
Treatment
heavy N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Ca contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The only change in plant composition under influence of heavy N fertilization was the increment of nitrates accumulation and decrease of Ca content in cabbage heads.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1817 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

164 papers: 144 positive, 20 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

density · quality: sugar starch · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 35 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

density · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.