Paper · 2020 · Animals

Potential of Recycling Cauliflower and Romanesco Wastes in Ruminant Feeding: In Vitro Studies

Trinidad de Evan; Andrea Vintimilla; Eduarda Molina-Alcaide; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed by analyzing their chemical composition, in vitro ruminal fermentation, and in vitro intestinal digestibility. In addition, the in vitro ruminal fermentation of diets containing increasing amounts of CAU was studied. The dry matter (DM) content of leaves, stems and sprouts of both vegetables was lower than 10%, but they contained high crude protein (CP; 19.9 to 33.0%) and sugar (16.3 to 28.7%) levels, and low neutral detergent fiber (21.6 to 32.3%). Stems and sprouts were more rapidly and extensively fermented in the rumen than leaves, but there were only minor differences the fermentation profiles of both vegetables. The estimated metabolizable energy content ranged from 9.3 (leaves) to 10.8 (sprouts) MJ/kg DM. The CP rumen degradability (12-h in situ incubations) was greater than 80.0% for all fractions, and the in vitro intestinal digestibility of CP ranged from 85.7 to 93.2%. The inclusion of up to 24% of dried CAU in the concentrate of a mixed diet (40:60 alfalfa hay:concentrate) increased the in vitro rumen fermentation of the CAU diet, but did not affect methane (CH4) production, indicating the lack of antimethanogenic compounds in CAU.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter content of cauliflower and Romanesco leaves, stems and sprouts is below 10%.

Organ / stage
leaves, stems and sproutse1
Outcome
dry matter (DM) contente1
Direction
lower thane1
Value
10%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“The dry matter (DM) content of leaves, stems and sprouts of both vegetables was lower than 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content of the wastes is 19.9 to 33.0%.

Outcome
crude proteine2
Value
19.9 to 33.0%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“they contained high crude protein (CP; 19.9 to 33.0%) and sugar (16.3 to 28.7%) levels, and low neutral detergent fiber (21.6 to 32.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content of the wastes is 16.3 to 28.7%.

Outcome
sugare2
Value
16.3 to 28.7%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“they contained high crude protein (CP; 19.9 to 33.0%) and sugar (16.3 to 28.7%) levels, and low neutral detergent fiber (21.6 to 32.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral detergent fiber content of the wastes is low, 21.6 to 32.3%.

Outcome
neutral detergent fibere2
Direction
lowe2
Value
21.6 to 32.3%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“they contained high crude protein (CP; 19.9 to 33.0%) and sugar (16.3 to 28.7%) levels, and low neutral detergent fiber (21.6 to 32.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–577 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stems and sprouts were fermented more rapidly and extensively in the rumen than leaves.

Organ / stage
Stems and sproutse3
Outcome
fermented in the rumene3
Direction
more rapidly and extensivelye3
Comparator
leavese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“Stems and sprouts were more rapidly and extensively fermented in the rumen than leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–665 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation profiles of cauliflower leaves and the other organs differ only minimally.

Outcome
fermentation profilese4
Qualifier
only minor differencese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“but there were only minor differences the fermentation profiles of both vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated metabolizable energy content ranges from 9.3 (leaves) to 10.8 (sprouts) MJ/kg DM.

Outcome
metabolizable energy contente5
Value
9.3 (leaves) to 10.8 (sprouts) MJ/kg DMe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“The estimated metabolizable energy content ranged from 9.3 (leaves) to 10.8 (sprouts) MJ/kg DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP rumen degradability is greater than 80.0% for all fractions.

Outcome
CP rumen degradabilitye6
Value
80.0%e6
Qualifier
12-h in situ incubationse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e6

“The CP rumen degradability (12-h in situ incubations) was greater than 80.0% for all fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro intestinal digestibility of CP ranges from 85.7 to 93.2%.

Outcome
in vitro intestinal digestibility of CPe7
Value
85.7 to 93.2%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e7

“the in vitro intestinal digestibility of CP ranged from 85.7 to 93.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Including up to 24% dried cauliflower in the concentrate increased in vitro rumen fermentation of the cauliflower diet.

Treatment
inclusion of up to 24% of dried CAU in the concentratee1
Outcome
in vitro rumen fermentatione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“The inclusion of up to 24% of dried CAU in the concentrate of a mixed diet (40:60 alfalfa hay:concentrate) increased the in vitro rumen fermentation of the CAU diet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Including up to 24% dried cauliflower in the concentrate did not affect methane production.

Treatment
inclusion of up to 24% of dried CAU in the concentratee1
Outcome
methane (CH4) productione2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“The inclusion of up to 24% of dried CAU in the concentrate of a mixed diet (40:60 alfalfa hay:concentrate) increased the in vitro rumen fermentation of the CAU diet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1182 · show in text ↑
e2

“but did not affect methane (CH4) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1227 · show in text ↑

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.