Abstract
A field experiment entitledIntegrated Nutrient Management on Summer Mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Malwa Region was conducted during summer season2021and2022at the field of Agronomy, SAGE University, Indore. There were nine treatment combinations of integrated nutrient management i.e. T1: Control, T2: RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha), T3: RDF + Rhizobium + PSB, T4: FYM (10 Kg/Ha), T5: FYM + Rh + PSB, T6: RDF (50%) + FYM (2.5 t/ha) + (Rh+ PSB), T7: RDF (50%) + FYM (5 t/ha) + (Rh+ PSB), T8: RDF (25%) + FYM (5 t/ha) + (Rh+ PSB) and T9: RDF (75%) + FYM (5 t/ha) + (Rh+ PSB) with four replications under Randomized Block Design. Based on two years experimental finding on mungbean under the influence of integrated nutrient management during the both seasons i.e., 2021 and 2022 with pooled, it appeared that conjoint application of T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior in plant height, plant dry matter accumulation (gram per meter row length), number of branches (plant-1), chlorophyll content in leaves (mg/g fresh weight of leaves), total number of root nodules (plant-1), effective number of root nodules (plant-1), fresh weight of root nodules (plant-1), and dry weight of root nodules (plant-1), various yield and yield attributing characteristics viz., number of pods (plant -1), number of seeds (Pod -1), test weight (1000 seed weight in grams), seed yield (Kg ha -1), straw yield (Kg ha -1), biological yield (Kg ha -1), harvest index (%), protein content (%) in seed, protein yield (Kg ha -1) by seed, nutrient content, nutrient uptake, cost of cultivation (Rs. ha-1), gross return (Rs. ha-1), net return (Rs. ha-1) and B:C ratio.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for plant height, dry matter accumulation and branch number.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae1 - Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e0
- Outcome
- plant height, plant dry matter accumulation (gram per meter row length), number of branches (plant-1)e0
- Direction
- significantly superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“conjoint application of T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior in plant height, plant dry matter accumulation (gram per meter row length), number of branches (plant-1)”
e1“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for leaf chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content in leavese0
- Direction
- significantly superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior in plant height, plant dry matter accumulation (gram per meter row length), number of branches (plant-1), chlorophyll content in leaves (mg/g fresh weight of leaves)”
e1“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for total and effective root nodule counts.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- total number of root nodules (plant-1), effective number of root nodules (plant-1)e0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total number of root nodules (plant-1), effective number of root nodules (plant-1)”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for fresh and dry root nodule weight.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- fresh weight of root nodules (plant-1), and dry weight of root nodules (plant-1)e0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fresh weight of root nodules (plant-1), and dry weight of root nodules (plant-1)”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for pods per plant, seeds per pod and test weight.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- number of pods (plant -1), number of seeds (Pod -1), test weight (1000 seed weight in grams)e0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of pods (plant -1), number of seeds (Pod -1), test weight (1000 seed weight in grams)”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for seed, straw and biological yield.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- seed yield (Kg ha -1), straw yield (Kg ha -1), biological yield (Kg ha -1)e0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield (Kg ha -1), straw yield (Kg ha -1), biological yield (Kg ha -1)”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for harvest index, seed protein content and protein yield.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- harvest index (%), protein content (%) in seed, protein yield (Kg ha -1) by seede0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“harvest index (%), protein content (%) in seed, protein yield (Kg ha -1) by seed”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for nutrient content and uptake.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- nutrient content, nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nutrient content, nutrient uptake”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for cultivation cost, gross return and net return.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- cost of cultivation (Rs. ha-1), gross return (Rs. ha-1), net return (Rs. ha-1)e0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cost of cultivation (Rs. ha-1), gross return (Rs. ha-1), net return (Rs. ha-1)”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 was significantly superior for the benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB)e1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B:C ratio”
e1“T9 treatment combination RDF (75%) + FYM (5t/ha) + (Rh + PSB) resulted in significantly superior”
e2“mungbean”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →humidity · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
humidity · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
humidity · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.