Paper · 2022 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

Bioefficacy of newer insecticide molecules against sucking insect pest complex in okra and their effect on predators

C. Satyanarayana; K.T. Arunakumara

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the bioefficacy of newer insecticide molecules against okra pest complex and their effect on natural enemies during kharif 2019–20. It was found that acetamiprid 20% SP registered significantly lower population of thrips (8.87/3 leaves), leafhopper (6.46/3 leaves), aphid (8.40/3 leaves) and whiteflies (8.46/3 leaves). Further, acetamiprid 20% SP recorded highest reduction in sucking insect pest population compared to untreated control. Imidacloprid 17.8 SL was next best option and registered significantly lower thrips (10.67/3 leaves), leafhoppers (8.53/3 leaves), aphids (10.60/3 leaves) and whiteflies (10.53/3 leaves) population. All the other treatments were significantly superior over untreated control. Acetamiprid 20% SP was also found to be relatively safer and did not have significant deleterious effect on natural enemies. Among all treatments, acetamiprid 20% SP resulted in significantly highest fruit yield (13.45 t/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid reduced thrips to 8.87/3 leaves.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20% SPe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
population of thripse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8.87/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetamiprid 20% SP registered significantly lower population of thrips (8.87/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–281 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid reduced leafhoppers to 6.46/3 leaves.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20% SPe0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
leafhoppere0
Direction
lowere0
Value
6.46/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetamiprid 20% SP registered significantly lower population of thrips (8.87/3 leaves), leafhopper (6.46/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–309 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid reduced aphids to 8.40/3 leaves.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20% SPe0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphide0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8.40/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetamiprid 20% SP registered significantly lower population of thrips (8.87/3 leaves), leafhopper (6.46/3 leaves), aphid (8.40/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid reduced whiteflies to 8.46/3 leaves.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20% SPe0
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae0pest
Outcome
whitefliese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8.46/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetamiprid 20% SP registered significantly lower population of thrips (8.87/3 leaves), leafhopper (6.46/3 leaves), aphid (8.40/3 leaves) and whiteflies (8.46/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–363 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid achieved the highest sucking pest reduction against untreated control.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20% SPe0
Outcome
sucking insect pest populatione0
Direction
highest reductione0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetamiprid 20% SP recorded highest reduction in sucking insect pest population compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced thrips to 10.67/3 leaves.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8 SLe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thripse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.67/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL was next best option and registered significantly lower thrips (10.67/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced leafhoppers to 8.53/3 leaves.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8 SLe0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhopperse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8.53/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL was next best option and registered significantly lower thrips (10.67/3 leaves), leafhoppers (8.53/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced aphids to 10.60/3 leaves.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8 SLe0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.60/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL was next best option and registered significantly lower thrips (10.67/3 leaves), leafhoppers (8.53/3 leaves), aphids (10.60/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced whiteflies to 10.53/3 leaves.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8 SLe0
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae0pest
Outcome
whitefliese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.53/3 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL was next best option and registered significantly lower thrips (10.67/3 leaves), leafhoppers (8.53/3 leaves), aphids (10.60/3 leaves) and whiteflies (10.53/3 leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other treatments outperformed untreated control.

Treatment
other treatmentse0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the other treatments were significantly superior over untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid had no significant deleterious effect on natural enemies.

Treatment
Acetamiprid 20% SPe0
Interactor
natural enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
deleterious effect on natural enemiese0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetamiprid 20% SP was also found to be relatively safer and did not have significant deleterious effect on natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid gave the highest fruit yield, 13.45 t/ha.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20% SPe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.45 t/hae0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments, acetamiprid 20% SP resulted in significantly highest fruit yield (13.45 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · ecology: diversity · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

acetamiprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

acetamiprid · Thrips · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · Cicadellidae · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acetamiprid · Aleyrodoidea · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imidacloprid · Aleyrodoidea · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

acetamiprid · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

imidacloprid · Aphidomorpha · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.