Paper · 2008 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Evaluation of promising molecules against sucking pests of Okra

D. Dhanalakshmi; C. P. Mallapur

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Among the different molecules, imidacloprid 200 SL @ 5.0 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g/l were the most effective against aphids, and leaf hopper. The next best treatment was spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l. On the contrary, spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l was most effective against thrips found on par with imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.5 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g/l. The higher good fruit yield was recorded in emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/l (47.02 q/ha). The next effective treatments included spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l (45.94 q/ha) and indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (43.03 q/ha). Among different newer molecules, emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/l, spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP 0.2 g/l were found as safe as untreated control to natural enemies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid and acetamiprid were the most effective treatments against aphids and leafhopper on okra.

Treatment
imidacloprid 200 SL @ 5.0 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g/le1
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
Second interactor
leaf hoppere1pest
Outcome
against aphids, and leaf hoppere1
Direction
most effectivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“imidacloprid 200 SL @ 5.0 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g/l were the most effective against aphids, and leaf hopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–149 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad was the most effective treatment against thrips on okra, on par with imidacloprid and acetamiprid.

Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/le2
Interactor
thripsThripse2pest
Outcome
against thripse2
Direction
most effectivee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l was most effective against thrips found on par with imidacloprid 200 SL @ 0.5 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate gave the higher good fruit yield of okra, 47.02 q/ha.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/le3
Outcome
good fruit yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
47.02 q/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The higher good fruit yield was recorded in emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/l (47.02 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–455 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the next effective good fruit yield of okra, 45.94 q/ha.

Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/le4
Outcome
good fruit yielde4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
45.94 q/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“The higher good fruit yield was recorded in emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/l (47.02 q/ha). The next effective treatments included spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l (45.94 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–534 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb gave a good fruit yield of okra of 43.03 q/ha, after emamectin benzoate and spinosad.

Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.3 ml/le5
Outcome
good fruit yielde5
Direction
lowerinferrede5
Value
43.03 q/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“The higher good fruit yield was recorded in emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/l (47.02 q/ha). The next effective treatments included spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l (45.94 q/ha) and indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (43.03 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate, spinosad and acetamiprid were as safe as untreated control to natural enemies.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/l, spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP 0.2 g/le6
Outcome
natural enemiese6
Direction
as safe ase6
Comparator
untreated controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sucking pests of Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.2 g/l, spinosad 45 SC @ 0.1 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP 0.2 g/l were found as safe as untreated control to natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–765 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · ecology: diversity · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.